[meta-java] maintainer status

[meta-java] maintainer status

[Mark Asselstine]

Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since 
mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the list 
and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers, directly to 
determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be looking to update the 
maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to restore the vitality of this 
repo? Have your roles or positions changed making it no longer viable for you 
to contribute to this repo?

Thanks in advance for your responses.

Mark

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Mark Asselstine]

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Mark Asselstine
<mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:
> Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since
> mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the list
> and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers, directly to
> determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be looking to update the
> maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to restore the vitality of this
> repo? Have your roles or positions changed making it no longer viable for you
> to contribute to this repo?
>
> Thanks in advance for your responses.

I got this back upon sending this out:
       ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
    <mario@ossystems.com.br>
        (reason: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach
does not exist. Please try)

So dropping him from the list and guessing that means we are down at
least one maintainer.

Mark

>
> Mark
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Mark Asselstine]

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Mark Asselstine
<mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Mark Asselstine
> <mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:
>> Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since
>> mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the list
>> and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers, directly to
>> determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be looking to update the
>> maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to restore the vitality of this
>> repo? Have your roles or positions changed making it no longer viable for you
>> to contribute to this repo?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your responses.
>
> I got this back upon sending this out:
>        ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
>     <mario@ossystems.com.br>
>         (reason: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach
> does not exist. Please try)
>
> So dropping him from the list and guessing that means we are down at
> least one maintainer.

Adding what I believe is Mario's new address to the TO list.

Mark

>
> Mark
>
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Otavio Salvador]

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Mark Asselstine
<mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:
> Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since
> mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the list
> and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers, directly to
> determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be looking to update the
> maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to restore the vitality of this
> repo? Have your roles or positions changed making it no longer viable for you
> to contribute to this repo?
>
> Thanks in advance for your responses.

I've been busy with multiple things and couldn't focus on it for a
while. But Maxin was keeping it up to date. Do you have a bundle of
patches need to take a review / test?

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854          Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Mark Asselstine]

On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 12:48:20 PM EDT Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Mark Asselstine
> 
> <mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:
> > Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since
> > mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the
> > list and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers,
> > directly to determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be
> > looking to update the maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to
> > restore the vitality of this repo? Have your roles or positions changed
> > making it no longer viable for you to contribute to this repo?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for your responses.
> 
> I've been busy with multiple things and couldn't focus on it for a
> while. But Maxin was keeping it up to date. Do you have a bundle of
> patches need to take a review / test?

There wasn't anything in particular, this email was instigated more by the 
observation that meta-java has been quiet. I do have a commit out for review 
but it is minor and not a big concern. There is one from Jason Wessel which is 
more immediate and would be nice to have reviewed and merged.

We should probably prepare something to update Mario's email or remove him 
from the list of maintainers as well.

Thanks for getting back to me.
Mark

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Mario Domenech Goulart]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 928 bytes --]

Hi Mark and all,

On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:11:26 -0400 Mark Asselstine <mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:

> Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since 
> mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the list 
> and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers, directly to 
> determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be looking to update the 
> maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to restore the vitality of this 
> repo? Have your roles or positions changed making it no longer viable for you 
> to contribute to this repo?
>
> Thanks in advance for your responses.

I haven't been actively maintaining meta-java.  Unfortunately I don't
have time to work on it anymore.  Sorry about that.

Attached is a patch to remove myself from the list of maintainers.

All the best.
Mario
-- 
http://parenteses.org/mario

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-README-Remove-Mario-Goulart-from-the-list-of-maintai.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 764 bytes --]

From 00386a17fe0014bacec2bb98e534b7a81e698bd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mario Domenech Goulart <mario@parenteses.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:25:55 +0200
Subject: [meta-java][PATCH] README: Remove Mario Goulart from the list of
 maintainers

Signed-off-by: Mario Domenech Goulart <mario@parenteses.org>
---
 README | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README b/README
index 33511ff..1dfea95 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ When sending patches, please use something like:
 Main layer maintainers:
 
   Henning Heinold <henning@itconsulting-heinold.de>
-  Mario Domenech Goulart <mario@ossystems.com.br>
   Maxin John <maxin.john@intel.com>
   Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
 
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Mark Asselstine]

On Wednesday, June 6, 2018 3:38:25 AM EDT Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Hi Mark and all,
> 
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:11:26 -0400 Mark Asselstine 
<mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:
> > Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since
> > mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the
> > list and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers,
> > directly to determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be
> > looking to update the maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to
> > restore the vitality of this repo? Have your roles or positions changed
> > making it no longer viable for you to contribute to this repo?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for your responses.
> 
> I haven't been actively maintaining meta-java.  Unfortunately I don't
> have time to work on it anymore.  Sorry about that.
> 
> Attached is a patch to remove myself from the list of maintainers.

Thanks for your time and work while you were a maintainer and good luck in 
your new adventure.

Mark

> 
> All the best.
> Mario

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Mario Domenech Goulart]

On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:31:27 -0400 Mark Asselstine <mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 6, 2018 3:38:25 AM EDT Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>> Hi Mark and all,
>> 
>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:11:26 -0400 Mark Asselstine <mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:
>> > Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since
>> > mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the
>> > list and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers,
>> > directly to determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be
>> > looking to update the maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to
>> > restore the vitality of this repo? Have your roles or positions changed
>> > making it no longer viable for you to contribute to this repo?
>> > 
>> > Thanks in advance for your responses.
>> 
>> I haven't been actively maintaining meta-java.  Unfortunately I don't
>> have time to work on it anymore.  Sorry about that.
>> 
>> Attached is a patch to remove myself from the list of maintainers.
>
> Thanks for your time and work while you were a maintainer and good luck in 
> your new adventure.

Thanks, Mark.  Appreciated.

I must say the credits should go to O.S. Systems too, as they actually
supported the work.

All the best.
Mario
-- 
http://parenteses.org/mario

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Mark Asselstine]

On Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:10:15 AM EDT Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:31:27 -0400 Mark Asselstine 
<mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 6, 2018 3:38:25 AM EDT Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> >> Hi Mark and all,
> >> 
> >> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:11:26 -0400 Mark Asselstine 
<mark.asselstine@windriver.com> wrote:
> >> > Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java
> >> > since
> >> > mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the
> >> > list and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers,
> >> > directly to determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be
> >> > looking to update the maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to
> >> > restore the vitality of this repo? Have your roles or positions changed
> >> > making it no longer viable for you to contribute to this repo?
> >> > 
> >> > Thanks in advance for your responses.
> >> 
> >> I haven't been actively maintaining meta-java.  Unfortunately I don't
> >> have time to work on it anymore.  Sorry about that.
> >> 
> >> Attached is a patch to remove myself from the list of maintainers.
> > 
> > Thanks for your time and work while you were a maintainer and good luck in
> > your new adventure.
> 
> Thanks, Mark.  Appreciated.
> 
> I must say the credits should go to O.S. Systems too, as they actually
> supported the work.

Definitely. The orgs that actively encourage and support their employees time 
for these endevours should always be commended. It is win win win.

Mark

> 
> All the best.
> Mario

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Henning Heinold]

On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:11:26AM -0400, Mark Asselstine wrote:
> Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since 
> mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the list 
> and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers, directly to 
> determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be looking to update the 
> maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to restore the vitality of this 
> repo? Have your roles or positions changed making it no longer viable for you 
> to contribute to this repo?
> 
> Thanks in advance for your responses.
> 
> Mark

Hi Mark,

if the situation is that bad, I can take over some reviews, but my time
is limited too and I can not run builds by myself, because of lacking
ressources.

Henning

PS: In few seconds I will push the proto xorg change.

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Richard Leitner]

On 06/06/2018 10:42 PM, Henning Heinold wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:11:26AM -0400, Mark Asselstine wrote:
>> Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since 
>> mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the list 
>> and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers, directly to 
>> determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be looking to update the 
>> maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to restore the vitality of this 
>> repo? Have your roles or positions changed making it no longer viable for you 
>> to contribute to this repo?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your responses.
>>
>> Mark
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> if the situation is that bad, I can take over some reviews, but my time
> is limited too and I can not run builds by myself, because of lacking
> ressources.

Thank you Henning!

As long as there are not too many patches coming in I can run the builds
and do some testing of openjdk 7 & 8 for armhf on hardware and of course
qemu if that helps?

regards;Richard.L

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Henning Heinold]

On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 07:44:51AM +0200, Richard Leitner wrote:
> 
> On 06/06/2018 10:42 PM, Henning Heinold wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:11:26AM -0400, Mark Asselstine wrote:
> >> Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since 
> >> mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the list 
> >> and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers, directly to 
> >> determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be looking to update the 
> >> maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to restore the vitality of this 
> >> repo? Have your roles or positions changed making it no longer viable for you 
> >> to contribute to this repo?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance for your responses.
> >>
> >> Mark
> > 
> > Hi Mark,
> > 
> > if the situation is that bad, I can take over some reviews, but my time
> > is limited too and I can not run builds by myself, because of lacking
> > ressources.
> 
> Thank you Henning!
> 
> As long as there are not too many patches coming in I can run the builds
> and do some testing of openjdk 7 & 8 for armhf on hardware and of course
> qemu if that helps?
> 
> regards;Richard.L

Hi,

yes that would help a lot and beside that I would ask you to become a maintainer
too, if it is possible.

Bye Henning

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Richard Leitner]

On 06/07/2018 03:22 PM, Henning Heinold wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 07:44:51AM +0200, Richard Leitner wrote:
>>
>> On 06/06/2018 10:42 PM, Henning Heinold wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:11:26AM -0400, Mark Asselstine wrote:
>>>> Several of us have noticed that nothing has been merged to meta-java since 
>>>> mid-April (roughly 8 weeks ago). With about a dozen commits sent to the list 
>>>> and pending merges I thought I might email you, the maintainers, directly to 
>>>> determine if this is expected to continue. Should we be looking to update the 
>>>> maintainers list and/or recruiting new people to restore the vitality of this 
>>>> repo? Have your roles or positions changed making it no longer viable for you 
>>>> to contribute to this repo?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for your responses.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> if the situation is that bad, I can take over some reviews, but my time
>>> is limited too and I can not run builds by myself, because of lacking
>>> ressources.
>>
>> Thank you Henning!
>>
>> As long as there are not too many patches coming in I can run the builds
>> and do some testing of openjdk 7 & 8 for armhf on hardware and of course
>> qemu if that helps?
>>
>> regards;Richard.L
> 
> Hi,
> 
> yes that would help a lot and beside that I would ask you to become a maintainer
> too, if it is possible.
> 
> Bye Henning
> 

As I'm using this layer now for quite a few years I'll be glad to help you with
the maintainership of meta-java. Nonetheless I have to admit that I have no
experience in maintaining an openembedded layer ;-)

Therefore if you're still interested I'd have some questions regarding the
"strategic" targets, workflows and stuff like that...

regards;Richard.L

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Otavio Salvador]

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Richard Leitner
<richard.leitner@skidata.com> wrote:
....
> As I'm using this layer now for quite a few years I'll be glad to help you with
> the maintainership of meta-java. Nonetheless I have to admit that I have no
> experience in maintaining an openembedded layer ;-)
>
> Therefore if you're still interested I'd have some questions regarding the
> "strategic" targets, workflows and stuff like that...

Awesome, new energy!

Sure, go ahead and ask :-D

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854          Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Mark Asselstine]

On Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:56:34 AM EDT Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Richard Leitner
> <richard.leitner@skidata.com> wrote:
> ....
> 
> > As I'm using this layer now for quite a few years I'll be glad to help you
> > with the maintainership of meta-java. Nonetheless I have to admit that I
> > have no experience in maintaining an openembedded layer ;-)
> > 
> > Therefore if you're still interested I'd have some questions regarding the
> > "strategic" targets, workflows and stuff like that...
> 
> Awesome, new energy!

+1. This is great news, thanks Richard for all your previous work and commits 
to meta-java and for putting up your hand to help maintain this layer. This is 
about the best outcome I could have asked for when I started this thread.

Thanks everyone,
Mark

> 
> Sure, go ahead and ask :-D

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Richard Leitner]

On 06/07/2018 03:56 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Richard Leitner
> <richard.leitner@skidata.com> wrote:
> ....
>> As I'm using this layer now for quite a few years I'll be glad to help you with
>> the maintainership of meta-java. Nonetheless I have to admit that I have no
>> experience in maintaining an openembedded layer ;-)
>>
>> Therefore if you're still interested I'd have some questions regarding the
>> "strategic" targets, workflows and stuff like that...
> 
> Awesome, new energy!
> 
> Sure, go ahead and ask :-D
> 

Thanks :-)

So here are some question that currently came to my mind:

 * do you use some kind of patch management software (like patchwork)?

 * are there any "quality gate tests" for patches being applied to master or stable branches?

 * is there something like a build/test robot for patches and/or branches?

 * should we use the master-next branch for staging new patches?

 * is there a reason for not having OpenJDK >8 recipes?

 * if the above is answered with something like "because nobody submitted them": Should we try to follow the current OpenJDK release model (a feature release every six month)?

 * based on what scheduling are the stable branches created? Yocto Project release dates I guess?

 * what kind of patches should be applied/backported to the stable branches?


I think that's all for now (but presumably some more question will follow during the next weeks) ;-)

regards;Richard.L

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Maxin B. John]

Hi Richard,

Sorry for my long silence here in the list ( was away due to a personal loss).


On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 04:32:36PM +0200, prvs=68935beb6=Richard.Leitner@skidata.com wrote:
> On 06/07/2018 03:56 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Richard Leitner
> > <richard.leitner@skidata.com> wrote:
> > ....
> >> As I'm using this layer now for quite a few years I'll be glad to help you with
> >> the maintainership of meta-java. Nonetheless I have to admit that I have no
> >> experience in maintaining an openembedded layer ;-)
> >> Therefore if you're still interested I'd have some questions regarding the
> >> "strategic" targets, workflows and stuff like that...
> > 
> > Awesome, new energy!

Great ! 

> > Sure, go ahead and ask :-D
> > 
> 
> Thanks :-)
> 
> So here are some question that currently came to my mind:
> 
>  * do you use some kind of patch management software (like patchwork)?

meta-java doesn't use patchwork till now.

>  * are there any "quality gate tests" for patches being applied to master or stable branches?

At the moment, we dont have enough tests in meta-java (It will be good to have more selftests). Moving
from manual build/testing to a Jenkins based automated one was briefly tested in a personal setup.

>  * is there something like a build/test robot for patches and/or branches?
Not yet. Tested a travis based setup in github. Testing wasn't successful due to the resource restrictions
(mainly storage) there.

>  * should we use the master-next branch for staging new patches?

Preferably - yes.

>  * is there a reason for not having OpenJDK >8 recipes?

Nothing that I can remember :)

>  * if the above is answered with something like "because nobody submitted them": Should we try to follow the current OpenJDK release model (a feature release every six month)?

+1, That will be nice. 

>  * based on what scheduling are the stable branches created? Yocto Project release dates I guess?

Yes.

>  * what kind of patches should be applied/backported to the stable branches?

Depends. Mostly security based patches and others, based on urgency/demand.

> 
> I think that's all for now (but presumably some more question will follow during the next weeks) ;-)
>
> regards;Richard.L

Best Regards,
Maxin

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Henning Heinold]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 02:30:35PM +0300, Maxin B. John wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> Sorry for my long silence here in the list ( was away due to a personal loss).
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 04:32:36PM +0200, prvs=68935beb6=Richard.Leitner@skidata.com wrote:
> > On 06/07/2018 03:56 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Richard Leitner
> > > <richard.leitner@skidata.com> wrote:
> > > ....
> > >> As I'm using this layer now for quite a few years I'll be glad to help you with
> > >> the maintainership of meta-java. Nonetheless I have to admit that I have no
> > >> experience in maintaining an openembedded layer ;-)
> > >> Therefore if you're still interested I'd have some questions regarding the
> > >> "strategic" targets, workflows and stuff like that...
> > > 
> > > Awesome, new energy!
> 
> Great ! 
> 
> > > Sure, go ahead and ask :-D
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks :-)
> > 
> > So here are some question that currently came to my mind:
> > 
> >  * do you use some kind of patch management software (like patchwork)?
> 
> meta-java doesn't use patchwork till now.

Yes, but we are using the normal the oe mailinglist, that is why you can find
the patches with the meta-java tag in the current patchwork too.

Bye Henning

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Richard Leitner]

Hi Maxin, Hi Henning,

thank you for your answers!

On 06/11/2018 02:08 PM, Henning Heinold wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 02:30:35PM +0300, Maxin B. John wrote:
>>>
>>> So here are some question that currently came to my mind:
>>>
>>>  * do you use some kind of patch management software (like patchwork)?
>>
>> meta-java doesn't use patchwork till now.
> 
> Yes, but we are using the normal the oe mailinglist, that is why you can find
> the patches with the meta-java tag in the current patchwork too.

Just saw it. Thanks for that hint.
So should we use it too?
IMHO it's a good tool for "not forgetting patches" ;-)

AFAIK I still have an account there, but according to the login it's "inactive".
May someone "re-activate" it please?

regards;Richard.L

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Michael Halstead]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Richard Leitner <
richard.leitner@skidata.com> wrote:

> Hi Maxin, Hi Henning,
>
> thank you for your answers!
>
> On 06/11/2018 02:08 PM, Henning Heinold wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 02:30:35PM +0300, Maxin B. John wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So here are some question that currently came to my mind:
> >>>
> >>>  * do you use some kind of patch management software (like patchwork)?
> >>
> >> meta-java doesn't use patchwork till now.
> >
> > Yes, but we are using the normal the oe mailinglist, that is why you can
> find
> > the patches with the meta-java tag in the current patchwork too.
>
> Just saw it. Thanks for that hint.
> So should we use it too?
> IMHO it's a good tool for "not forgetting patches" ;-)
>
> AFAIK I still have an account there, but according to the login it's
> "inactive".
> May someone "re-activate" it please?
>

I can help with patchwork. I'll e-mail you with a few questions.

-- 
Michael Halstead
SysAdmin

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Richard Leitner]

Hi,

On 06/12/2018 10:59 PM, Michael Halstead wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Richard Leitner
> <richard.leitner@skidata.com <mailto:richard.leitner@skidata.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Maxin, Hi Henning,
> 
>     thank you for your answers!
> 
>     On 06/11/2018 02:08 PM, Henning Heinold wrote:
>     > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 02:30:35PM +0300, Maxin B. John wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>> So here are some question that currently came to my mind:
>     >>>
>     >>>  * do you use some kind of patch management software (like patchwork)?
>     >>
>     >> meta-java doesn't use patchwork till now.
>     > 
>     > Yes, but we are using the normal the oe mailinglist, that is why you can find
>     > the patches with the meta-java tag in the current patchwork too.
> 
>     Just saw it. Thanks for that hint.
>     So should we use it too?
>     IMHO it's a good tool for "not forgetting patches" ;-)
> 
>     AFAIK I still have an account there, but according to the login it's
>     "inactive".
>     May someone "re-activate" it please?
> 
> 
> I can help with patchwork. I'll e-mail you with a few questions.

Thank you Michael!

Another question just came to my mind:
How should I deal with my own patches?
Am I "allowed" to apply them myself or should another maintainer do
this? If I should do it on my own: How long should they "stay" on the
mailinglist before?

regards;Richard.L

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Burton, Ross]

On 13 June 2018 at 06:42,
<openembedded-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> Another question just came to my mind:
> How should I deal with my own patches?
> Am I "allowed" to apply them myself or should another maintainer do
> this? If I should do it on my own: How long should they "stay" on the
> mailinglist before?

If they're trivial I can't see a problem with post-and-push.  For
anything that isn't pretty obvious, they should have a bit of time on
the list.

Ross

Re: [meta-java] maintainer status

[Richard Leitner]

On 06/13/2018 12:05 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 13 June 2018 at 06:42,
> <openembedded-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>> Another question just came to my mind:
>> How should I deal with my own patches?
>> Am I "allowed" to apply them myself or should another maintainer do
>> this? If I should do it on my own: How long should they "stay" on the
>> mailinglist before?
> 
> If they're trivial I can't see a problem with post-and-push.  For
> anything that isn't pretty obvious, they should have a bit of time on
> the list.

Seems like a fair deal. Thank you!