All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: -Wimplicit-fallthrough not working with ccache
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:49:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18320143-188a-8940-1830-1955e279952a@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zhqwuggt.fsf_-_@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>

Hi Kalle,

On 2/16/19 5:21 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (replying to an old thread but renaming it)
> 
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:
> 
>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>>
>>> Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "pass through" with
>>> a proper "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting
>>> to find.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.
>>
>> f1d270ae10ff ath10k: htt_tx: mark expected switch fall-throughs
> 
> Gustavo, I enabled W=1 on my ath10k build checks and it took me a while
> to figure out why GCC was warning about fall through annotations missing
> even I knew you had fixed them. Finally I figured out that the reason
> was ccache, which I need because I work with different branches and need
> to recompile the kernel quite often.
> 
> If the plan is to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough by default in the kernel
> IMHO this might become an issue, as otherwise people using ccache start
> seeing lots of invalid warnings. Apparently CCACHE_COMMENTS=1 will fix
> that but my version of ccache doesn't support it, and how would everyone
> learn that trick anyway? Or maybe CCACHE_COMMENTS can enabled through
> kernel Makefile?
> 

Can you share with me the warning messages you get?

I just see the following warnings with linux-next:

$ make CC="ccache gcc" W=1 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_tx.o
  CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_tx.o
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_tx.c:19:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt.h:1727:1: warning: alignment 1 of ‘struct ath10k_htt_txbuf_32’ is less than 4 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
 } __packed;
 ^
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt.h:1734:1: warning: alignment 1 of ‘struct ath10k_htt_txbuf_64’ is less than 4 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
 } __packed;
 ^

In my Makefile I have:

KBUILD_CFLAGS  += $(call cc-option,-Wimplicit-fallthrough=3,)


Thanks
--
Gustavo


















WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: -Wimplicit-fallthrough not working with ccache
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:49:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18320143-188a-8940-1830-1955e279952a@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zhqwuggt.fsf_-_@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>

Hi Kalle,

On 2/16/19 5:21 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (replying to an old thread but renaming it)
> 
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:
> 
>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>>
>>> Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "pass through" with
>>> a proper "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting
>>> to find.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.
>>
>> f1d270ae10ff ath10k: htt_tx: mark expected switch fall-throughs
> 
> Gustavo, I enabled W=1 on my ath10k build checks and it took me a while
> to figure out why GCC was warning about fall through annotations missing
> even I knew you had fixed them. Finally I figured out that the reason
> was ccache, which I need because I work with different branches and need
> to recompile the kernel quite often.
> 
> If the plan is to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough by default in the kernel
> IMHO this might become an issue, as otherwise people using ccache start
> seeing lots of invalid warnings. Apparently CCACHE_COMMENTS=1 will fix
> that but my version of ccache doesn't support it, and how would everyone
> learn that trick anyway? Or maybe CCACHE_COMMENTS can enabled through
> kernel Makefile?
> 

Can you share with me the warning messages you get?

I just see the following warnings with linux-next:

$ make CC="ccache gcc" W=1 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_tx.o
  CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_tx.o
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_tx.c:19:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt.h:1727:1: warning: alignment 1 of ‘struct ath10k_htt_txbuf_32’ is less than 4 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
 } __packed;
 ^
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt.h:1734:1: warning: alignment 1 of ‘struct ath10k_htt_txbuf_64’ is less than 4 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
 } __packed;
 ^

In my Makefile I have:

KBUILD_CFLAGS  += $(call cc-option,-Wimplicit-fallthrough=3,)


Thanks
--
Gustavo


















_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-18 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-24 22:59 [PATCH] ath10k: htt_tx: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-05-24 22:59 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-06-13 11:40 ` Kalle Valo
2018-06-13 11:40   ` Kalle Valo
2019-02-16 11:21   ` -Wimplicit-fallthrough not working with ccache Kalle Valo
2019-02-16 11:21     ` Kalle Valo
2019-02-18 17:49     ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2019-02-18 17:49       ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-06-13 11:41 ` ath10k: htt_tx: mark expected switch fall-throughs Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18320143-188a-8940-1830-1955e279952a@embeddedor.com \
    --to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.