* rgw: Bug #13207 has not been backported to Hammer?
@ 2016-08-26 1:38 KIMURA Osamu
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: KIMURA Osamu @ 2016-08-26 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel
Hi,
It may be too late for v0.94.8 time frame, but...
Is the bug#13207 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13207 backported to Hammer?
I just received a issue from an our customer: buckets or objects that
are granted for "AuthenticatedUsers" are accessible by anonymous users.
Then I found this issue#13207.
Regarding the code on latest hammer branch, it seems this fix is not applied.
Is it possible to backport this fix into Hammer?
I have a more question.
The issue#13207 mentions only for read. If a object is granted FULL_CONTROL
for Authenticated Users, is it writable?
Regards,
--
KIMURA Osamu / 木村 修
Engineering Department, Storage Development Division,
Data Center Platform Business Unit, FUJITSU LIMITED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2016-08-26 2:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-26 1:38 rgw: Bug #13207 has not been backported to Hammer? KIMURA Osamu
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.