All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] vringh: remove vringh_iov and unite to vringh_kiov
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:26:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18a0a7cd-0601-0ff6-12d7-353819692155@igel.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEvmZ5MEX4WMa3JhzT404C2uhsNk0nnkYBRtvLPhNTSzHQ@mail.gmail.com>


On 2022/12/28 15:36, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 3:06 PM Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp> wrote:
>> 2022年12月27日(火) 15:04 Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>:
>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:25 AM Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp> wrote:
>>>> struct vringh_iov is defined to hold userland addresses. However, to use
>>>> common function, __vring_iov, finally the vringh_iov converts to the
>>>> vringh_kiov with simple cast. It includes compile time check code to make
>>>> sure it can be cast correctly.
>>>>
>>>> To simplify the code, this patch removes the struct vringh_iov and unifies
>>>> APIs to struct vringh_kiov.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>
>>> While at this, I wonder if we need to go further, that is, switch to
>>> using an iov iterator instead of a vringh customized one.
>> I didn't see the iov iterator yet, thank you for informing me.
>> Is that iov_iter? https://lwn.net/Articles/625077/
> Exactly.

I've investigated the iov_iter, vhost and related APIs. As a result, I
think that it is not easy to switch to use the iov_iter. Because, the
design of vhost and vringh is different.

The iov_iter has vring desc info and meta data of transfer method. The
vhost provides generic transfer function for the iov_iter. In constrast,
vringh_iov just has vring desc info. The vringh provides transfer functions
for each methods.

In the future, it is better to use common data structure and APIs between
vhost and vringh (or merge completely), but it requires a lot of 
changes, so I'd like to just
organize data structure in vringh as a first step in this patch.


Best

> Thanks
>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 32 ++++++------------------------
>>>>   include/linux/vringh.h | 45 ++++--------------------------------------
>>>>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>>>> index 828c29306565..aa3cd27d2384 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>>>> @@ -691,8 +691,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_init_user);
>>>>    * calling vringh_iov_cleanup() to release the memory, even on error!
>>>>    */
>>>>   int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>> -                       struct vringh_iov *riov,
>>>> -                       struct vringh_iov *wiov,
>>>> +                       struct vringh_kiov *riov,
>>>> +                       struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
>>>>                          bool (*getrange)(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>>                                           u64 addr, struct vringh_range *r),
>>>>                          u16 *head)
>>>> @@ -708,26 +708,6 @@ int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>>          if (err == vrh->vring.num)
>>>>                  return 0;
>>>>
>>>> -       /* We need the layouts to be the identical for this to work */
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct vringh_kiov) != sizeof(struct vringh_iov));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, iov) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct vringh_iov, iov));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, i) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct vringh_iov, i));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, used) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct vringh_iov, used));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, max_num) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct vringh_iov, max_num));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct iovec) != sizeof(struct kvec));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct iovec, iov_base) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct kvec, iov_base));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct iovec, iov_len) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct kvec, iov_len));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(((struct iovec *)NULL)->iov_base)
>>>> -                    != sizeof(((struct kvec *)NULL)->iov_base));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(((struct iovec *)NULL)->iov_len)
>>>> -                    != sizeof(((struct kvec *)NULL)->iov_len));
>>>> -
>>>>          *head = err;
>>>>          err = __vringh_iov(vrh, *head, (struct vringh_kiov *)riov,
>>>>                             (struct vringh_kiov *)wiov,
>>>> @@ -740,14 +720,14 @@ int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_getdesc_user);
>>>>
>>>>   /**
>>>> - * vringh_iov_pull_user - copy bytes from vring_iov.
>>>> + * vringh_iov_pull_user - copy bytes from vring_kiov.
>>>>    * @riov: the riov as passed to vringh_getdesc_user() (updated as we consume)
>>>>    * @dst: the place to copy.
>>>>    * @len: the maximum length to copy.
>>>>    *
>>>>    * Returns the bytes copied <= len or a negative errno.
>>>>    */
>>>> -ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_iov *riov, void *dst, size_t len)
>>>> +ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_kiov *riov, void *dst, size_t len)
>>>>   {
>>>>          return vringh_iov_xfer(NULL, (struct vringh_kiov *)riov,
>>>>                                 dst, len, xfer_from_user);
>>>> @@ -755,14 +735,14 @@ ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_iov *riov, void *dst, size_t len)
>>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_iov_pull_user);
>>>>
>>>>   /**
>>>> - * vringh_iov_push_user - copy bytes into vring_iov.
>>>> + * vringh_iov_push_user - copy bytes into vring_kiov.
>>>>    * @wiov: the wiov as passed to vringh_getdesc_user() (updated as we consume)
>>>>    * @src: the place to copy from.
>>>>    * @len: the maximum length to copy.
>>>>    *
>>>>    * Returns the bytes copied <= len or a negative errno.
>>>>    */
>>>> -ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_iov *wiov,
>>>> +ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
>>>>                               const void *src, size_t len)
>>>>   {
>>>>          return vringh_iov_xfer(NULL, (struct vringh_kiov *)wiov,
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/vringh.h b/include/linux/vringh.h
>>>> index 1991a02c6431..733d948e8123 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/vringh.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/vringh.h
>>>> @@ -79,18 +79,6 @@ struct vringh_range {
>>>>          u64 offset;
>>>>   };
>>>>
>>>> -/**
>>>> - * struct vringh_iov - iovec mangler.
>>>> - *
>>>> - * Mangles iovec in place, and restores it.
>>>> - * Remaining data is iov + i, of used - i elements.
>>>> - */
>>>> -struct vringh_iov {
>>>> -       struct iovec *iov;
>>>> -       size_t consumed; /* Within iov[i] */
>>>> -       unsigned i, used, max_num;
>>>> -};
>>>> -
>>>>   /**
>>>>    * struct vringh_kiov - kvec mangler.
>>>>    *
>>>> @@ -113,44 +101,19 @@ int vringh_init_user(struct vringh *vrh, u64 features,
>>>>                       vring_avail_t __user *avail,
>>>>                       vring_used_t __user *used);
>>>>
>>>> -static inline void vringh_iov_init(struct vringh_iov *iov,
>>>> -                                  struct iovec *iovec, unsigned num)
>>>> -{
>>>> -       iov->used = iov->i = 0;
>>>> -       iov->consumed = 0;
>>>> -       iov->max_num = num;
>>>> -       iov->iov = iovec;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> -static inline void vringh_iov_reset(struct vringh_iov *iov)
>>>> -{
>>>> -       iov->iov[iov->i].iov_len += iov->consumed;
>>>> -       iov->iov[iov->i].iov_base -= iov->consumed;
>>>> -       iov->consumed = 0;
>>>> -       iov->i = 0;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> -static inline void vringh_iov_cleanup(struct vringh_iov *iov)
>>>> -{
>>>> -       if (iov->max_num & VRINGH_IOV_ALLOCATED)
>>>> -               kfree(iov->iov);
>>>> -       iov->max_num = iov->used = iov->i = iov->consumed = 0;
>>>> -       iov->iov = NULL;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>>   /* Convert a descriptor into iovecs. */
>>>>   int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>> -                       struct vringh_iov *riov,
>>>> -                       struct vringh_iov *wiov,
>>>> +                       struct vringh_kiov *riov,
>>>> +                       struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
>>>>                          bool (*getrange)(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>>                                           u64 addr, struct vringh_range *r),
>>>>                          u16 *head);
>>>>
>>>>   /* Copy bytes from readable vsg, consuming it (and incrementing wiov->i). */
>>>> -ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_iov *riov, void *dst, size_t len);
>>>> +ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_kiov *riov, void *dst, size_t len);
>>>>
>>>>   /* Copy bytes into writable vsg, consuming it (and incrementing wiov->i). */
>>>> -ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_iov *wiov,
>>>> +ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
>>>>                               const void *src, size_t len);
>>>>
>>>>   /* Mark a descriptor as used. */
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>> Best,
>> Shunsuke
>>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] vringh: remove vringh_iov and unite to vringh_kiov
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:26:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18a0a7cd-0601-0ff6-12d7-353819692155@igel.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEvmZ5MEX4WMa3JhzT404C2uhsNk0nnkYBRtvLPhNTSzHQ@mail.gmail.com>


On 2022/12/28 15:36, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 3:06 PM Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp> wrote:
>> 2022年12月27日(火) 15:04 Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>:
>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:25 AM Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp> wrote:
>>>> struct vringh_iov is defined to hold userland addresses. However, to use
>>>> common function, __vring_iov, finally the vringh_iov converts to the
>>>> vringh_kiov with simple cast. It includes compile time check code to make
>>>> sure it can be cast correctly.
>>>>
>>>> To simplify the code, this patch removes the struct vringh_iov and unifies
>>>> APIs to struct vringh_kiov.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>
>>> While at this, I wonder if we need to go further, that is, switch to
>>> using an iov iterator instead of a vringh customized one.
>> I didn't see the iov iterator yet, thank you for informing me.
>> Is that iov_iter? https://lwn.net/Articles/625077/
> Exactly.

I've investigated the iov_iter, vhost and related APIs. As a result, I
think that it is not easy to switch to use the iov_iter. Because, the
design of vhost and vringh is different.

The iov_iter has vring desc info and meta data of transfer method. The
vhost provides generic transfer function for the iov_iter. In constrast,
vringh_iov just has vring desc info. The vringh provides transfer functions
for each methods.

In the future, it is better to use common data structure and APIs between
vhost and vringh (or merge completely), but it requires a lot of 
changes, so I'd like to just
organize data structure in vringh as a first step in this patch.


Best

> Thanks
>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 32 ++++++------------------------
>>>>   include/linux/vringh.h | 45 ++++--------------------------------------
>>>>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>>>> index 828c29306565..aa3cd27d2384 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>>>> @@ -691,8 +691,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_init_user);
>>>>    * calling vringh_iov_cleanup() to release the memory, even on error!
>>>>    */
>>>>   int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>> -                       struct vringh_iov *riov,
>>>> -                       struct vringh_iov *wiov,
>>>> +                       struct vringh_kiov *riov,
>>>> +                       struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
>>>>                          bool (*getrange)(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>>                                           u64 addr, struct vringh_range *r),
>>>>                          u16 *head)
>>>> @@ -708,26 +708,6 @@ int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>>          if (err == vrh->vring.num)
>>>>                  return 0;
>>>>
>>>> -       /* We need the layouts to be the identical for this to work */
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct vringh_kiov) != sizeof(struct vringh_iov));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, iov) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct vringh_iov, iov));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, i) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct vringh_iov, i));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, used) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct vringh_iov, used));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vringh_kiov, max_num) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct vringh_iov, max_num));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct iovec) != sizeof(struct kvec));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct iovec, iov_base) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct kvec, iov_base));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct iovec, iov_len) !=
>>>> -                    offsetof(struct kvec, iov_len));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(((struct iovec *)NULL)->iov_base)
>>>> -                    != sizeof(((struct kvec *)NULL)->iov_base));
>>>> -       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(((struct iovec *)NULL)->iov_len)
>>>> -                    != sizeof(((struct kvec *)NULL)->iov_len));
>>>> -
>>>>          *head = err;
>>>>          err = __vringh_iov(vrh, *head, (struct vringh_kiov *)riov,
>>>>                             (struct vringh_kiov *)wiov,
>>>> @@ -740,14 +720,14 @@ int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_getdesc_user);
>>>>
>>>>   /**
>>>> - * vringh_iov_pull_user - copy bytes from vring_iov.
>>>> + * vringh_iov_pull_user - copy bytes from vring_kiov.
>>>>    * @riov: the riov as passed to vringh_getdesc_user() (updated as we consume)
>>>>    * @dst: the place to copy.
>>>>    * @len: the maximum length to copy.
>>>>    *
>>>>    * Returns the bytes copied <= len or a negative errno.
>>>>    */
>>>> -ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_iov *riov, void *dst, size_t len)
>>>> +ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_kiov *riov, void *dst, size_t len)
>>>>   {
>>>>          return vringh_iov_xfer(NULL, (struct vringh_kiov *)riov,
>>>>                                 dst, len, xfer_from_user);
>>>> @@ -755,14 +735,14 @@ ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_iov *riov, void *dst, size_t len)
>>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_iov_pull_user);
>>>>
>>>>   /**
>>>> - * vringh_iov_push_user - copy bytes into vring_iov.
>>>> + * vringh_iov_push_user - copy bytes into vring_kiov.
>>>>    * @wiov: the wiov as passed to vringh_getdesc_user() (updated as we consume)
>>>>    * @src: the place to copy from.
>>>>    * @len: the maximum length to copy.
>>>>    *
>>>>    * Returns the bytes copied <= len or a negative errno.
>>>>    */
>>>> -ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_iov *wiov,
>>>> +ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
>>>>                               const void *src, size_t len)
>>>>   {
>>>>          return vringh_iov_xfer(NULL, (struct vringh_kiov *)wiov,
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/vringh.h b/include/linux/vringh.h
>>>> index 1991a02c6431..733d948e8123 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/vringh.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/vringh.h
>>>> @@ -79,18 +79,6 @@ struct vringh_range {
>>>>          u64 offset;
>>>>   };
>>>>
>>>> -/**
>>>> - * struct vringh_iov - iovec mangler.
>>>> - *
>>>> - * Mangles iovec in place, and restores it.
>>>> - * Remaining data is iov + i, of used - i elements.
>>>> - */
>>>> -struct vringh_iov {
>>>> -       struct iovec *iov;
>>>> -       size_t consumed; /* Within iov[i] */
>>>> -       unsigned i, used, max_num;
>>>> -};
>>>> -
>>>>   /**
>>>>    * struct vringh_kiov - kvec mangler.
>>>>    *
>>>> @@ -113,44 +101,19 @@ int vringh_init_user(struct vringh *vrh, u64 features,
>>>>                       vring_avail_t __user *avail,
>>>>                       vring_used_t __user *used);
>>>>
>>>> -static inline void vringh_iov_init(struct vringh_iov *iov,
>>>> -                                  struct iovec *iovec, unsigned num)
>>>> -{
>>>> -       iov->used = iov->i = 0;
>>>> -       iov->consumed = 0;
>>>> -       iov->max_num = num;
>>>> -       iov->iov = iovec;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> -static inline void vringh_iov_reset(struct vringh_iov *iov)
>>>> -{
>>>> -       iov->iov[iov->i].iov_len += iov->consumed;
>>>> -       iov->iov[iov->i].iov_base -= iov->consumed;
>>>> -       iov->consumed = 0;
>>>> -       iov->i = 0;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> -static inline void vringh_iov_cleanup(struct vringh_iov *iov)
>>>> -{
>>>> -       if (iov->max_num & VRINGH_IOV_ALLOCATED)
>>>> -               kfree(iov->iov);
>>>> -       iov->max_num = iov->used = iov->i = iov->consumed = 0;
>>>> -       iov->iov = NULL;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>>   /* Convert a descriptor into iovecs. */
>>>>   int vringh_getdesc_user(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>> -                       struct vringh_iov *riov,
>>>> -                       struct vringh_iov *wiov,
>>>> +                       struct vringh_kiov *riov,
>>>> +                       struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
>>>>                          bool (*getrange)(struct vringh *vrh,
>>>>                                           u64 addr, struct vringh_range *r),
>>>>                          u16 *head);
>>>>
>>>>   /* Copy bytes from readable vsg, consuming it (and incrementing wiov->i). */
>>>> -ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_iov *riov, void *dst, size_t len);
>>>> +ssize_t vringh_iov_pull_user(struct vringh_kiov *riov, void *dst, size_t len);
>>>>
>>>>   /* Copy bytes into writable vsg, consuming it (and incrementing wiov->i). */
>>>> -ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_iov *wiov,
>>>> +ssize_t vringh_iov_push_user(struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
>>>>                               const void *src, size_t len);
>>>>
>>>>   /* Mark a descriptor as used. */
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>> Best,
>> Shunsuke
>>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-11  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-27  2:25 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Introduce a vringh accessor for IO memory Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25 ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] vringh: fix a typo in comments for vringh_kiov Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25   ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] vringh: remove vringh_iov and unite to vringh_kiov Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25   ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  6:04   ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27  6:04     ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27  7:05     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-27  7:05       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-27  7:13       ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  7:13         ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  7:56         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-27  7:56           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-27  7:57           ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  7:57             ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  7:05     ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  7:05       ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-28  6:36       ` Jason Wang
2022-12-28  6:36         ` Jason Wang
2023-01-11  3:26         ` Shunsuke Mie [this message]
2023-01-11  3:26           ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-01-11  5:54           ` Jason Wang
2023-01-11  5:54             ` Jason Wang
2023-01-11  6:19             ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-01-11  6:19               ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] tools/virtio: convert to new vringh user APIs Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25   ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] vringh: unify the APIs for all accessors Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25   ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  7:04   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-27  7:04     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-27  7:49     ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  7:49       ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 10:22       ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 10:22         ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27 14:37         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-27 14:37           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-28  2:24           ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-28  2:24             ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-28  7:20             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-28  7:20               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-11  4:10               ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-01-11  4:10                 ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] tools/virtio: convert to use new unified vringh APIs Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25   ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] caif_virtio: convert to " Shunsuke Mie
2022-12-27  2:25   ` Shunsuke Mie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18a0a7cd-0601-0ff6-12d7-353819692155@igel.co.jp \
    --to=mie@igel.co.jp \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.