All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 08:48:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1afb0702-3cc5-ba4f-2bdd-604d9da2b846@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190409212517.7321-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

On 09/04/2019 23.25, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:

> While refreshing these patches, which were orignally just targeted at
> x86-64, it occured to me that despite the implementation relying on
> inline asm, there's nothing x86 specific about it, and indeed it seems
> to work out-of-the-box for ppc64 and arm64 as well, but those have
> only been compile-tested.

So, apart from the Clang build failures for non-x86, I now also got a
report that gcc 4.8 miscompiles this stuff in some cases [1], even for
x86 - gcc 4.9 does not seem to have the problem. So, given that the 5.2
merge window just opened, I suppose this is the point where I should
pull the plug on this experiment :(

Rasmus

[1] Specifically, the problem manifested in net/ipv4/tcp_input.c: Both
uses of the static inline inet_csk_clear_xmit_timer() pass a
compile-time constant 'what', so the ifs get folded away and both uses
are completely inlined. Yet, gcc still decides to emit a copy of the
final 'else' branch of inet_csk_clear_xmit_timer() as its own
inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55 function, which is of course unused.
And despite the asm() that defines the ddebug descriptor being an "asm
volatile", gcc thinks it's fine to elide that (the code path is
unreachable, after all....), so the entire asm for that function is

        .section        .text.unlikely
        .type   inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55, @function
inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55:
        movq    $.LC1, %rsi     #,
        movq    $__UNIQUE_ID_ddebug160, %rdi    #,
        xorl    %eax, %eax      #
        jmp     __dynamic_pr_debug      #
        .size   inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55,
.-inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55

which of course fails to link since the symbol __UNIQUE_ID_ddebug160 is
nowhere defined.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 08:48:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1afb0702-3cc5-ba4f-2bdd-604d9da2b846@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190409212517.7321-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

On 09/04/2019 23.25, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:

> While refreshing these patches, which were orignally just targeted at
> x86-64, it occured to me that despite the implementation relying on
> inline asm, there's nothing x86 specific about it, and indeed it seems
> to work out-of-the-box for ppc64 and arm64 as well, but those have
> only been compile-tested.

So, apart from the Clang build failures for non-x86, I now also got a
report that gcc 4.8 miscompiles this stuff in some cases [1], even for
x86 - gcc 4.9 does not seem to have the problem. So, given that the 5.2
merge window just opened, I suppose this is the point where I should
pull the plug on this experiment :(

Rasmus

[1] Specifically, the problem manifested in net/ipv4/tcp_input.c: Both
uses of the static inline inet_csk_clear_xmit_timer() pass a
compile-time constant 'what', so the ifs get folded away and both uses
are completely inlined. Yet, gcc still decides to emit a copy of the
final 'else' branch of inet_csk_clear_xmit_timer() as its own
inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55 function, which is of course unused.
And despite the asm() that defines the ddebug descriptor being an "asm
volatile", gcc thinks it's fine to elide that (the code path is
unreachable, after all....), so the entire asm for that function is

        .section        .text.unlikely
        .type   inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55, @function
inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55:
        movq    $.LC1, %rsi     #,
        movq    $__UNIQUE_ID_ddebug160, %rdi    #,
        xorl    %eax, %eax      #
        jmp     __dynamic_pr_debug      #
        .size   inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55,
.-inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55

which of course fails to link since the symbol __UNIQUE_ID_ddebug160 is
nowhere defined.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	x86@kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 08:48:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1afb0702-3cc5-ba4f-2bdd-604d9da2b846@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190409212517.7321-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

On 09/04/2019 23.25, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:

> While refreshing these patches, which were orignally just targeted at
> x86-64, it occured to me that despite the implementation relying on
> inline asm, there's nothing x86 specific about it, and indeed it seems
> to work out-of-the-box for ppc64 and arm64 as well, but those have
> only been compile-tested.

So, apart from the Clang build failures for non-x86, I now also got a
report that gcc 4.8 miscompiles this stuff in some cases [1], even for
x86 - gcc 4.9 does not seem to have the problem. So, given that the 5.2
merge window just opened, I suppose this is the point where I should
pull the plug on this experiment :(

Rasmus

[1] Specifically, the problem manifested in net/ipv4/tcp_input.c: Both
uses of the static inline inet_csk_clear_xmit_timer() pass a
compile-time constant 'what', so the ifs get folded away and both uses
are completely inlined. Yet, gcc still decides to emit a copy of the
final 'else' branch of inet_csk_clear_xmit_timer() as its own
inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55 function, which is of course unused.
And despite the asm() that defines the ddebug descriptor being an "asm
volatile", gcc thinks it's fine to elide that (the code path is
unreachable, after all....), so the entire asm for that function is

        .section        .text.unlikely
        .type   inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55, @function
inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55:
        movq    $.LC1, %rsi     #,
        movq    $__UNIQUE_ID_ddebug160, %rdi    #,
        xorl    %eax, %eax      #
        jmp     __dynamic_pr_debug      #
        .size   inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55,
.-inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer.part.55

which of course fails to link since the symbol __UNIQUE_ID_ddebug160 is
nowhere defined.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-06  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-09 21:25 [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 01/10] linux/device.h: use unique identifier for each struct _ddebug Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 02/10] linux/net.h: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 03/10] linux/printk.h: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 04/10] dynamic_debug: introduce accessors for string members of " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 05/10] dynamic_debug: drop use of bitfields in " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 06/10] dynamic_debug: introduce CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 07/10] dynamic_debug: add asm-generic implementation for DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 08/10] x86-64: select DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-10  7:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 09/10] arm64: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26  9:39   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-26  9:39     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-26 10:05     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 10:05       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 13:00       ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-04-26 13:00         ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-04-26 19:06         ` [PATCH 11/10] arm64: unbreak DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y build with clang Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 19:06           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 19:06           ` [PATCH 12/10] powerpc: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 19:06             ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-29 17:34             ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-29 17:34               ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-26 19:27           ` [PATCH 11/10] arm64: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 19:27             ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-26 21:58             ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-04-26 21:58               ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-04-26 22:07             ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-04-26 22:07               ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-04-29 17:32           ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-29 17:32             ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-30 18:22             ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-30 18:22               ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-05-02  8:57               ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-02  8:57                 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 10/10] powerpc: select DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS for PPC64 Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-23 15:37   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-04-23 19:36     ` Andrew Morton
2019-04-23 19:36       ` Andrew Morton
2019-04-24  6:46       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-24  6:46         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06  6:48 ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2019-05-06  6:48   ` [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06  6:48   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06  7:05   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06  7:05     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06  7:05     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06  7:34     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06  7:34       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06  7:34       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06  7:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06  7:48         ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06  7:48         ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06 14:48       ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-05-06 14:48         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-05-06 14:48         ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1afb0702-3cc5-ba4f-2bdd-604d9da2b846@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.