* [Qemu-devel] blockdev-add/del status
@ 2017-02-15 15:26 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2017-02-15 15:37 ` Eric Blake
2017-02-15 15:59 ` Max Reitz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy @ 2017-02-15 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-block, qemu-devel
Cc: Max Reitz, Stefan Hajnoczi, John Snow, Jeff Cody, Kevin Wolf,
Fam Zheng, Denis V. Lunev
Hi all!
What is the status of qmp commands blockdev-add and x-blockdev-del? Is
blockdev-add stable (it never had x- prefix)? What should be done to get
rid of "x-" for x-blockdev-del?
I see a lot of work on blockdev-add in the list, but x-blockdev-del
seems untouched about 8 moths..
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] blockdev-add/del status
2017-02-15 15:26 [Qemu-devel] blockdev-add/del status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
@ 2017-02-15 15:37 ` Eric Blake
2017-02-15 15:59 ` Max Reitz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Blake @ 2017-02-15 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, qemu-block, qemu-devel
Cc: Kevin Wolf, Fam Zheng, Jeff Cody, Max Reitz, Stefan Hajnoczi,
Denis V. Lunev, John Snow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1101 bytes --]
On 02/15/2017 09:26 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> What is the status of qmp commands blockdev-add and x-blockdev-del? Is
> blockdev-add stable (it never had x- prefix)? What should be done to get
> rid of "x-" for x-blockdev-del?
We are still working on 'BlockdevOptions' for iscsi, rbd, and sheepdog.
When those are done (target of 2.9), then x-blockdev-del will be renamed
to drop the x- prefix, and blockdev-add will be considered stable.
Meanwhile, we are also working on adding a -blockdev command line option
that maps to the QMP command, again targetted for 2.9.
>
> I see a lot of work on blockdev-add in the list, but x-blockdev-del
> seems untouched about 8 moths..
Right now, x-blockdev-del is unlikely to change much, if at all; rather,
it keeps the name to remind us that blockdev-add is still changing, so
that we'll have a nice witness during introspection that both interfaces
are stable based on the loss of the x- prefix.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] blockdev-add/del status
2017-02-15 15:26 [Qemu-devel] blockdev-add/del status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2017-02-15 15:37 ` Eric Blake
@ 2017-02-15 15:59 ` Max Reitz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Max Reitz @ 2017-02-15 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, qemu-block, qemu-devel
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, John Snow, Jeff Cody, Kevin Wolf, Fam Zheng,
Denis V. Lunev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On 15.02.2017 16:26, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> What is the status of qmp commands blockdev-add and x-blockdev-del? Is
> blockdev-add stable (it never had x- prefix)? What should be done to get
> rid of "x-" for x-blockdev-del?
To add to what Eric said, we simply forgot the x- prefix for blockdev-add.
Max
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 512 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-15 15:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-15 15:26 [Qemu-devel] blockdev-add/del status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2017-02-15 15:37 ` Eric Blake
2017-02-15 15:59 ` Max Reitz
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.