From: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu>,
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@gmx.net>,
reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Horrible ftruncate performance
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:55:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307152155.09716.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030715170540.GA1213@namesys.com>
Am Dienstag, 15. Juli 2003 19:05 schrieb Oleg Drokin:
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:48:58PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The 'right' questions are:
> > * Are the 204,804 MB really needed?
>
> In reiserfs - yes.
>
> > * How many space do XFS, JFS and ext3 'use'?
>
> ext2 uses 16 kb for me (4k blocksize)
>
> > * When the above three can do it a 1000 times faster why can't we?
>
> We can, only in case of reiserfs we have nasty races if we do that.
> Or may be not. I have something to discuss around, I guess ;)
>
> > * Do the three other do it right?
>
> I do not know.
>
> > Removing of the sparse files can take horrible amount of time.
>
> Does the patch below helps?
Somewhat.
Mouse movement is OK, now. But...
NSTALL/SOURCE> l
insgesamt 1032
drwxrwxr-x 2 root root 176 Jul 15 21:45 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 72 Jul 3 01:39 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 452390 Jul 15 00:29
kmplayer-0.7.96.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 403358 Jul 14 21:46
modutils-2.4.21-18.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 194505 Jul 14 22:01
procps-2.0.13-1.src.rpm
INSTALL/SOURCE> time dd if=/dev/zero of=sparse bs=1 seek=200G count=1 ; time
sync
1+0 Records ein
1+0 Records aus
0.000u 3.090s 0:16.81 18.3% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
0.000u 0.050s 0:00.27 18.5% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
INSTALL/SOURCE> sync
INSTALL/SOURCE> time dd if=/dev/zero of=sparse1 bs=1 seek=200G count=1 ; time
sync
1+0 Records ein
1+0 Records aus
0.000u 3.010s 0:15.27 19.7% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
0.000u 0.020s 0:01.01 1.9% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
INSTALL/SOURCE> sync
INSTALL/SOURCE> time dd if=/dev/zero of=sparse2 bs=1 seek=200G count=1 ; time
sync
1+0 Records ein
1+0 Records aus
0.000u 2.760s 0:15.16 18.2% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
0.000u 0.030s 0:00.85 3.5% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
INSTALL/SOURCE> sync
INSTALL/SOURCE> l
insgesamt 615444
drwxrwxr-x 2 root root 248 Jul 15 21:46 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 72 Jul 3 01:39 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 452390 Jul 15 00:29
kmplayer-0.7.96.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 403358 Jul 14 21:46
modutils-2.4.21-18.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 194505 Jul 14 22:01
procps-2.0.13-1.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 214748364801 Jul 15 21:46 sparse
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 214748364801 Jul 15 21:46 sparse1
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 214748364801 Jul 15 21:47 sparse2
INSTALL/SOURCE> time rm sparse2 ; time sync
0.000u 4.930s 0:04.88 101.0% 0+0k 0+0io 130pf+0w
0.000u 0.010s 0:00.02 50.0% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
INSTALL/SOURCE> time rm sparse1 ; time sync
0.000u 4.950s 0:04.87 101.6% 0+0k 0+0io 130pf+0w
0.000u 0.030s 0:00.05 60.0% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
INSTALL/SOURCE> time rm sparse ; time sync
0.000u 14.990s 1:31.15 16.4% 0+0k 0+0io 130pf+0w
0.000u 0.030s 0:00.22 13.6% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > If I 'create' a second sparse file with the same name over an existing
> > one (overwrite) I get the 1000 times speedup!
>
> Hm. Interesting observation.
Unchanged.
INSTALL/SOURCE> time dd if=/dev/zero of=sparse bs=1 seek=200G count=1 ; time
sync
1+0 Records ein
1+0 Records aus
0.000u 2.750s 0:15.31 17.9% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
0.010u 0.050s 0:00.93 6.4% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
INSTALL/SOURCE> l
insgesamt 205836
drwxrwxr-x 2 root root 200 Jul 15 21:52 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 72 Jul 3 01:39 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 452390 Jul 15 00:29
kmplayer-0.7.96.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 403358 Jul 14 21:46
modutils-2.4.21-18.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 194505 Jul 14 22:01
procps-2.0.13-1.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 214748364801 Jul 15 21:52 sparse
INSTALL/SOURCE> sync
INSTALL/SOURCE> time dd if=/dev/zero of=sparse bs=1 seek=200G count=1 ; time
sync
1+0 Records ein
1+0 Records aus
0.010u 0.000s 0:00.00 0.0% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
0.000u 0.030s 0:00.03 100.0% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
INSTALL/SOURCE> l
insgesamt 205836
drwxrwxr-x 2 root root 200 Jul 15 21:52 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 72 Jul 3 01:39 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 452390 Jul 15 00:29
kmplayer-0.7.96.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 403358 Jul 14 21:46
modutils-2.4.21-18.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 194505 Jul 14 22:01
procps-2.0.13-1.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 nuetzel users 214748364801 Jul 15 21:53 sparse
> > Chris and Oleg what do you need?
> > SYSRQ-P/M?
>
> I guess I need additional pair of brains ;)
> Also some time that I can spend thinking about all of this.
> I guess I'd have plently of it in the Saturday, while flying to Canada.
> Only I won't be able to do any experiments. Sigh.
>
> Bye,
> Oleg
>
> ===== fs/reiserfs/stree.c 1.22 vs edited =====
> --- 1.22/fs/reiserfs/stree.c Tue Jun 24 11:30:22 2003
> +++ edited/fs/reiserfs/stree.c Tue Jul 15 20:57:09 2003
> @@ -1773,6 +1773,8 @@
> journal_begin(th, p_s_inode->i_sb, orig_len_alloc) ;
> reiserfs_update_inode_transaction(p_s_inode) ;
> }
> + if ( current->need_resched )
> + schedule();
> } while ( n_file_size > ROUND_UP (n_new_file_size) &&
> search_for_position_by_key(p_s_inode->i_sb, &s_item_key,
> &s_search_path) == POSITION_FOUND ) ;
Good night!
It's summer now;-)
Dieter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-15 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-10 3:23 Horrible ftruncate performance Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-07-10 5:29 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-10 7:30 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-07-10 9:21 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-10 8:17 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-07-10 10:01 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-10 14:01 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-07-10 15:44 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-11 14:35 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-11 14:49 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-11 15:16 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-11 15:24 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-11 15:27 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-11 15:32 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-11 15:35 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-11 15:32 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-11 15:36 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-11 15:36 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-11 15:38 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-11 15:34 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-11 15:44 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-11 17:09 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-11 17:27 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-11 18:32 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-11 19:51 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-12 1:37 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-07-12 5:16 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-07-12 3:49 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-07-12 13:51 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-15 12:19 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-07-15 16:48 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-15 17:05 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-15 19:55 ` Dieter Nützel [this message]
2003-07-16 10:35 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-16 10:47 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-16 10:57 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-17 18:12 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-22 16:43 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-22 16:50 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-22 18:09 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-22 18:24 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-23 0:16 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-23 6:25 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-23 5:49 ` Voicu Liviu
2003-07-23 7:32 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-23 7:19 ` Voicu Liviu
2003-07-23 6:14 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-23 14:38 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-23 14:55 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-23 16:20 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-23 12:25 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-23 13:39 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-23 13:46 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-23 13:52 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-23 14:24 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-23 15:24 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2003-07-12 14:05 ` Dieter Nützel
2003-07-13 13:00 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-13 12:58 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-14 8:45 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-13 13:03 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-07-15 11:51 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-07-15 13:51 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-11 19:23 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2003-08-03 14:05 ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-04 13:41 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-11 14:27 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-11 14:32 ` Dieter Nützel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307152155.09716.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--to=dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@gmx.net \
--cc=green@namesys.com \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=szaka@sienet.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.