All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 2.5.XX very sluggish
@ 2003-07-13 16:28 Chris Morgan
  2003-07-13 16:45 ` Doug McNaught
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Morgan @ 2003-07-13 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

1.4Ghz Athlon via 82cxx chipset, software raid 1 scsi drives, currently 
running 2.4.21

With 2.5.73/74/75(the only ones I've tried thus far) the kernel boots fine 
until it tries to mount the reiserfs partition on the raid1 set.  Replaying 
the journal takes many times longer than with 2.4.  Once it gets past that 
point the whole machine appears to be quite sluggish.  Is this a known issue 
with reiserfs + software raid 1?  What information would be useful to aid in 
debugging?

I have smp disabled, preemption enabled, tried with generic x86 
disabled/enabled.

Thanks,
Chris


Please cc me on replies, I'm not on the list yet.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.5.XX very sluggish
  2003-07-13 16:28 2.5.XX very sluggish Chris Morgan
@ 2003-07-13 16:45 ` Doug McNaught
  2003-07-14  3:21   ` Chris Morgan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Doug McNaught @ 2003-07-13 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Morgan; +Cc: linux-kernel

Chris Morgan <cmorgan@alum.wpi.edu> writes:

> 1.4Ghz Athlon via 82cxx chipset, software raid 1 scsi drives, currently 
> running 2.4.21
> 
> With 2.5.73/74/75(the only ones I've tried thus far) the kernel boots fine 
> until it tries to mount the reiserfs partition on the raid1 set.  Replaying 
> the journal takes many times longer than with 2.4.  Once it gets past that 
> point the whole machine appears to be quite sluggish.  Is this a known issue 
> with reiserfs + software raid 1?  What information would be useful to aid in 
> debugging?

What does 'hdparm' say about DMA settings on your drive under 2.5?

-Doug

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.5.XX very sluggish
  2003-07-13 16:45 ` Doug McNaught
@ 2003-07-14  3:21   ` Chris Morgan
  2003-07-16  2:32     ` Chris Morgan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Morgan @ 2003-07-14  3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Doug McNaught; +Cc: linux-kernel

Under 2.4.21:

For my boot drive, ide:

/dev/hdc2:
 multcount    = 16 (on)
 IO_support   =  1 (32-bit)
 unmaskirq    =  1 (on)
 using_dma    =  1 (on)
 keepsettings =  0 (off)
 readonly     =  0 (off)
 readahead    =  8 (on)
 geometry     = 2100/255/63, sectors = 32740470, start = 996030

For the scsi drives(2 drives in a raid 1 setup):
/dev/sda:
 readonly     =  0 (off)
 geometry     = 17885/255/63, sectors = 287332384, start = 0

And some performance numbers, maybe these are helpful:

/dev/md1:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.60 seconds =213.33 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.22 seconds = 28.83 MB/sec

/dev/hdc:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.56 seconds =228.57 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.33 seconds = 14.78 MB/sec



Under 2.5.75:

/dev/hdc:
 multcount    = 16 (on)
 IO_support   =  1 (32-bit)
 unmaskirq    =  1 (on)
 using_dma    =  1 (on)
 keepsettings =  0 (off)
 readonly     =  0 (off)
 readahead    = 256 (on)
 geometry     = 33483/16/63, sectors = 33750864, start = 0

These are with X running:

/dev/hdc:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in 30.58 seconds =  4.19 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in 20.98 seconds =  3.05 MB/sec
Hmm.. suspicious results: probably not enough free memory for a proper test.

/dev/md1:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in 108.76 seconds =  1.18 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in 44.86 seconds =  1.43 MB/sec
Hmm.. suspicious results: probably not enough free memory for a proper test.

With X shutdown:
/dev/hdc:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in 11.26 seconds = 11.36 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  6.88 seconds =  9.30 MB/sec
Hmm.. suspicious results: probably not enough free memory for a proper test.

/dev/md1:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in 11.88 seconds = 10.77 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  7.74 seconds =  8.27 MB/sec
Hmm.. suspicious results: probably not enough free memory for a proper test.

I'm running xf4.2.1 and the 'nv' driver.

Any ideas as to what else I can look at?

Thanks,
Chris


On Sunday 13 July 2003 12:45 pm, Doug McNaught wrote:
> Chris Morgan <cmorgan@alum.wpi.edu> writes:
> > 1.4Ghz Athlon via 82cxx chipset, software raid 1 scsi drives, currently
> > running 2.4.21
> >
> > With 2.5.73/74/75(the only ones I've tried thus far) the kernel boots
> > fine until it tries to mount the reiserfs partition on the raid1 set. 
> > Replaying the journal takes many times longer than with 2.4.  Once it
> > gets past that point the whole machine appears to be quite sluggish.  Is
> > this a known issue with reiserfs + software raid 1?  What information
> > would be useful to aid in debugging?
>
> What does 'hdparm' say about DMA settings on your drive under 2.5?
>
> -Doug


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.5.XX very sluggish
  2003-07-14  3:21   ` Chris Morgan
@ 2003-07-16  2:32     ` Chris Morgan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Morgan @ 2003-07-16  2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Doug McNaught; +Cc: linux-kernel

I see the same behavior with 2.6.0 test1.  I can't imagine I'm the only person 
seeing this issue, anything else I can do to help with debugging?

Chris


On Sunday 13 July 2003 11:21 pm, Chris Morgan wrote:
> Under 2.4.21:
>
> For my boot drive, ide:
>
> /dev/hdc2:
>  multcount    = 16 (on)
>  IO_support   =  1 (32-bit)
>  unmaskirq    =  1 (on)
>  using_dma    =  1 (on)
>  keepsettings =  0 (off)
>  readonly     =  0 (off)
>  readahead    =  8 (on)
>  geometry     = 2100/255/63, sectors = 32740470, start = 996030
>
> For the scsi drives(2 drives in a raid 1 setup):
> /dev/sda:
>  readonly     =  0 (off)
>  geometry     = 17885/255/63, sectors = 287332384, start = 0
>
> And some performance numbers, maybe these are helpful:
>
> /dev/md1:
>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.60 seconds =213.33 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.22 seconds = 28.83 MB/sec
>
> /dev/hdc:
>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.56 seconds =228.57 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.33 seconds = 14.78 MB/sec
>
>
>
> Under 2.5.75:
>
> /dev/hdc:
>  multcount    = 16 (on)
>  IO_support   =  1 (32-bit)
>  unmaskirq    =  1 (on)
>  using_dma    =  1 (on)
>  keepsettings =  0 (off)
>  readonly     =  0 (off)
>  readahead    = 256 (on)
>  geometry     = 33483/16/63, sectors = 33750864, start = 0
>
> These are with X running:
>
> /dev/hdc:
>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in 30.58 seconds =  4.19 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in 20.98 seconds =  3.05 MB/sec
> Hmm.. suspicious results: probably not enough free memory for a proper
> test.
>
> /dev/md1:
>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in 108.76 seconds =  1.18 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in 44.86 seconds =  1.43 MB/sec
> Hmm.. suspicious results: probably not enough free memory for a proper
> test.
>
> With X shutdown:
> /dev/hdc:
>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in 11.26 seconds = 11.36 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  6.88 seconds =  9.30 MB/sec
> Hmm.. suspicious results: probably not enough free memory for a proper
> test.
>
> /dev/md1:
>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in 11.88 seconds = 10.77 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  7.74 seconds =  8.27 MB/sec
> Hmm.. suspicious results: probably not enough free memory for a proper
> test.
>
> I'm running xf4.2.1 and the 'nv' driver.
>
> Any ideas as to what else I can look at?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> On Sunday 13 July 2003 12:45 pm, Doug McNaught wrote:
> > Chris Morgan <cmorgan@alum.wpi.edu> writes:
> > > 1.4Ghz Athlon via 82cxx chipset, software raid 1 scsi drives, currently
> > > running 2.4.21
> > >
> > > With 2.5.73/74/75(the only ones I've tried thus far) the kernel boots
> > > fine until it tries to mount the reiserfs partition on the raid1 set.
> > > Replaying the journal takes many times longer than with 2.4.  Once it
> > > gets past that point the whole machine appears to be quite sluggish. 
> > > Is this a known issue with reiserfs + software raid 1?  What
> > > information would be useful to aid in debugging?
> >
> > What does 'hdparm' say about DMA settings on your drive under 2.5?
> >
> > -Doug


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-16  2:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-13 16:28 2.5.XX very sluggish Chris Morgan
2003-07-13 16:45 ` Doug McNaught
2003-07-14  3:21   ` Chris Morgan
2003-07-16  2:32     ` Chris Morgan

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.