Re: File System shootout...

["Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>]

Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2003 23:15 schrieb Mike Benoit:
> On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 04:55, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > Mike Benoit writes:
> > >  > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the
> > >  > benchmarks I've been running over the last week between all the
> > >  > major file systems (and there different mount options) using both
> > >  > Bonnie++ and IOzone. More tests are currently underway, so the
> > >  > results will be updated as they come in.
> > >  >
> > >  > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of
> > >  > each of the different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> > >  >
> > >  > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
> > >
> > > I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++
> > > results for reiser4 vs. ext3:
> > >
> > > on the box with 128M of ram:
> >
> > Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch
> > (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
>
> Do you have a link to the 2.6.0-test5+ data-logging patch?

v3 experimental data=ordered and logging speedups for 2.6.1
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=107453067611552&w=2

And following posts.

Hope it's not too late or double post...;-)

Running very well with SuSE's 9.0 2.6.2-6 on RAID0 and RAID1, U320 15k.

Cheers,
	Dieter