* Re: Re: File System shootout...
@ 2003-10-10 11:55 ` Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?=
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: linux-kernel-owner @ 2003-10-10 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikita; +Cc: linux-kernel, mikeb, Reiserfs-List
> Mike Benoit writes:
> > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
> > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
> > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
> > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
> > come in.
> >
> > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
> > different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> >
> > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
>
> I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results
> for reiser4 vs. ext3:
>
> on the box with 128M of ram:
Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
Greetings,
Dieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: File System shootout...
@ 2003-10-10 11:55 ` Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?=
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?= @ 2003-10-10 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikita; +Cc: linux-kernel, mikeb, Reiserfs-List
> Mike Benoit writes:
> > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
> > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
> > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
> > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
> > come in.
> >
> > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
> > different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> >
> > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
>
> I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results
> for reiser4 vs. ext3:
>
> on the box with 128M of ram:
Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
Greetings,
Dieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: File System shootout...
2003-10-10 11:55 ` Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?=
(?)
@ 2003-10-14 21:15 ` Mike Benoit
2004-02-16 13:23 ` Dieter Nützel
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mike Benoit @ 2003-10-14 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dieter Nützel; +Cc: Nikita, Reiserfs-List
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 04:55, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > Mike Benoit writes:
> > > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
> > > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
> > > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
> > > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
> > > come in.
> > >
> > > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
> > > different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> > >
> > > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
> >
> > I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results
> > for reiser4 vs. ext3:
> >
> > on the box with 128M of ram:
>
> Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
>
Do you have a link to the 2.6.0-test5+ data-logging patch?
> Greetings,
> Dieter
--
Best Regards,
Mike Benoit
NetNation Communications Inc.
Systems Engineer
Tel: 604-684-6892 or 888-983-6600
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are my own and not
necessarily those of my employer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: File System shootout...
2003-10-14 21:15 ` Mike Benoit
@ 2004-02-16 13:23 ` Dieter Nützel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dieter Nützel @ 2004-02-16 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mikeb; +Cc: reiserfs-list
Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2003 23:15 schrieb Mike Benoit:
> On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 04:55, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > Mike Benoit writes:
> > > > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the
> > > > benchmarks I've been running over the last week between all the
> > > > major file systems (and there different mount options) using both
> > > > Bonnie++ and IOzone. More tests are currently underway, so the
> > > > results will be updated as they come in.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of
> > > > each of the different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> > > >
> > > > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
> > >
> > > I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++
> > > results for reiser4 vs. ext3:
> > >
> > > on the box with 128M of ram:
> >
> > Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch
> > (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
>
> Do you have a link to the 2.6.0-test5+ data-logging patch?
v3 experimental data=ordered and logging speedups for 2.6.1
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=107453067611552&w=2
And following posts.
Hope it's not too late or double post...;-)
Running very well with SuSE's 9.0 2.6.2-6 on RAID0 and RAID1, U320 15k.
Cheers,
Dieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* File System shootout...
@ 2003-10-08 18:08 Mike Benoit
2003-10-09 10:33 ` Nikita Danilov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mike Benoit @ 2003-10-08 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
(and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
come in.
Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
http://fsbench.netnation.com/
--
Best Regards,
Mike Benoit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: File System shootout...
2003-10-08 18:08 Mike Benoit
@ 2003-10-09 10:33 ` Nikita Danilov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Nikita Danilov @ 2003-10-09 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: mikeb, Reiserfs mail-list
Mike Benoit writes:
> To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
> I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
> (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
> tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
> come in.
>
> Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
> different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
>
> http://fsbench.netnation.com/
I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results
for reiser4 vs. ext3:
on the box with 128M of ram:
./bonnie++ -s 1g -n 10 -x 5
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
v4.128M 1G 19903 89 37911 20 15392 11 13624 58 41807 12 131.0 0
v4.128M 1G 19965 89 37600 20 15845 11 13730 58 41751 12 130.0 0
v4.128M 1G 19937 89 37746 20 15404 11 13624 58 41793 12 132.1 0
v4.128M 1G 19998 89 37184 19 15007 10 13393 56 41611 11 130.2 0
v4.128M 1G 19771 89 37679 20 15206 11 13466 57 41808 11 130.2 1
ext3.128M 1G 21236 99 37258 22 11357 4 13460 56 41748 6 120.0 0
ext3.128M 1G 20821 99 36838 23 12176 5 13154 55 40671 6 120.7 0
ext3.128M 1G 20755 99 37032 24 12069 4 12908 54 40851 5 120.2 0
ext3.128M 1G 20651 99 37094 24 11817 5 13038 54 40842 6 121.3 0
ext3.128M 1G 20928 99 37300 23 12287 4 13067 55 41404 6 120.1 0
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files:max:min /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
v4.128M 10 18503 100 +++++ +++ 9488 99 10158 99 +++++ +++ 11635 99
v4.128M 10 19760 99 +++++ +++ 9696 99 10441 100 +++++ +++ 11831 99
v4.128M 10 19583 100 +++++ +++ 9672 100 10597 99 +++++ +++ 11846 100
v4.128M 10 19720 100 +++++ +++ 9577 99 10126 100 +++++ +++ 11924 100
v4.128M 10 19682 100 +++++ +++ 9683 100 10461 100 +++++ +++ 11834 100
ext3.128M 10 3279 97 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 3406 100 +++++ +++ 8951 95
ext3.128M 10 3303 98 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 3423 99 +++++ +++ 8558 96
ext3.128M 10 3317 98 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 3402 100 +++++ +++ 8721 93
ext3.128M 10 3325 98 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 3390 100 +++++ +++ 9242 100
ext3.128M 10 3315 97 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 3439 100 +++++ +++ 8896 96
./bonnie++ -f -d . -s 3072 -n 10:100000:10:10 -x 1
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
v4 3G 37579 19 15657 11 41531 11 105.8 0
v4 3G 37993 20 15478 11 41632 11 105.4 0
ext3 3G 35221 22 10987 4 41105 6 90.9 0
ext3 3G 35099 22 11517 4 41416 6 90.7 0
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Creat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: File System shootout...
@ 2003-10-07 23:02 Barry, Christopher
2003-10-07 23:21 ` Mike Fedyk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Barry, Christopher @ 2003-10-07 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Reiserfs-List (E-mail)
Link is broken for me...;-(
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Benoit [mailto:mikeb@netnation.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:46 PM
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: File System shootout...
To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
I've been running over the last week, between all the major file systems
(and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
come in.
Hopefully they will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
http://fsbench.netnation.com/
--
Best Regards,
Mike Benoit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* File System shootout...
@ 2003-10-07 22:45 Mike Benoit
2003-10-08 9:36 ` KELEMEN Peter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mike Benoit @ 2003-10-07 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
I've been running over the last week, between all the major file systems
(and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
come in.
Hopefully they will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
http://fsbench.netnation.com/
--
Best Regards,
Mike Benoit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: File System shootout...
2003-10-07 22:45 Mike Benoit
@ 2003-10-08 9:36 ` KELEMEN Peter
2003-10-08 16:37 ` Mike Fedyk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: KELEMEN Peter @ 2003-10-08 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
* Mike Benoit (mikeb@netnation.com) [20031007 15:45]:
> http://fsbench.netnation.com/
Nice pages, but please repeat measurements with file sizes at
least 16x larger than physical memory to eliminate caching
effects. Also, since you're obviously processing the results,
percentage relative to best (or worst) performance would help
comparison.
Peter
--
.+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+''
Kelemen Péter / \ / \ Peter.Kelemen@cern.ch
.+' `+...+' `+...+' `+...+' `+...+'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: File System shootout...
2003-10-08 9:36 ` KELEMEN Peter
@ 2003-10-08 16:37 ` Mike Fedyk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mike Fedyk @ 2003-10-08 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:36:02AM +0200, KELEMEN Peter wrote:
> effects. Also, since you're obviously processing the results,
> percentage relative to best (or worst) performance would help
> comparison.
Also some color coding from worst to best would be nice too. Since you
can't sort on each inidividual test, this will help identify the changes at
a glance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-16 13:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-10 11:55 Re: File System shootout linux-kernel-owner
2003-10-10 11:55 ` Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?=
2003-10-14 21:15 ` Mike Benoit
2004-02-16 13:23 ` Dieter Nützel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-08 18:08 Mike Benoit
2003-10-09 10:33 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-10-07 23:02 Barry, Christopher
2003-10-07 23:21 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-10-07 22:45 Mike Benoit
2003-10-08 9:36 ` KELEMEN Peter
2003-10-08 16:37 ` Mike Fedyk
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.