From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Nikita@Namesys.COM
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikeb@netnation.com,
Reiserfs-List@Namesys.COM
Subject: Re: Re: File System shootout...
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:55:47 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239031.1065786947952.JavaMail.nobody@franzjosef> (raw)
> Mike Benoit writes:
> > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
> > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
> > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
> > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
> > come in.
> >
> > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
> > different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> >
> > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
>
> I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results
> for reiser4 vs. ext3:
>
> on the box with 128M of ram:
Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
Greetings,
Dieter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?= <dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: Nikita@Namesys.COM
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikeb@netnation.com,
Reiserfs-List@Namesys.COM
Subject: Re: Re: File System shootout...
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:55:47 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239031.1065786947952.JavaMail.nobody@franzjosef> (raw)
> Mike Benoit writes:
> > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
> > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
> > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
> > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
> > come in.
> >
> > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
> > different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> >
> > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
>
> I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results
> for reiser4 vs. ext3:
>
> on the box with 128M of ram:
Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
Greetings,
Dieter
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-10 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-10 11:55 linux-kernel-owner [this message]
2003-10-10 11:55 ` Re: File System shootout Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?=
2003-10-14 21:15 ` Mike Benoit
2004-02-16 13:23 ` Dieter Nützel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1239031.1065786947952.JavaMail.nobody@franzjosef \
--to=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=Nikita@Namesys.COM \
--cc=Reiserfs-List@Namesys.COM \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikeb@netnation.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.