[POWERPC] Wire up sys_getcpu

[POWERPC] Wire up sys_getcpu

[Stephen Rothwell]

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Arnd, should this be _SPU?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h b/include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h
index 97b4354..418e5c7 100644
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h
@@ -305,3 +305,4 @@ SYSCALL_SPU(faccessat)
 COMPAT_SYS_SPU(get_robust_list)
 COMPAT_SYS_SPU(set_robust_list)
 COMPAT_SYS(move_pages)
+SYSCALL_SPU(getcpu)
-- 
1.4.4.4

Re: [POWERPC] Wire up sys_getcpu

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 12 February 2007 12:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> =A0include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h | =A0 =A01 +
> =A01 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>=20
> Arnd, should this be _SPU?

Good question. There is nothing wrong with having the SPU call this,
i.e. it won't break stuff. The question is more if it should return
an SPU number instead of a CPU number. I've had people ask for
a feature like that in the past.

The node information returned from the call usually is the same for
the CPU and the SPU, but we don't guarantee that, unless the user
has specified node affinity.

I don't see a 'right' answer for your question, but I'd say let's
not forbid the user to call it and make it _SPU, even if it is
pointless.

	Arnd <><