All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Suspend/resume semantics for ISDN drivers (was: NAK new drivers without proper power management?)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:35:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070308233520.GD2793@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703042004.26684.rjw@sisk.pl>

Hi!

> > On 12.02.2007 01:10 I wrote:
> > > I don't doubt your basic assessment. However it doesn't translate that
> > > easily into a real implementation. In my case, I maintain a USB driver,
> > > so I have to deal with USB specifics of suspend/resume which happen not
> > > to be that well documented. My driver provides an isdn4linux device but
> > > isdn4linux knows nothing about suspend/resume so I am on my own on how
> > > to reconcile the two. The device itself, though in turn far from trivial,
> > > is actually the least of my worries.
> > 
> > So, how *should* an isdn4linux driver handle a request to suspend?
> > Specifically, if there are active connections, should it try to
> > shut them down in an orderly fashion (which might imply some delays
> > waiting for the remote station to acknowledge, etc.)? Should it kill
> > them abruptly (as for a USB unplug event)? Or should it just refuse
> > to suspend while a connection is still active?
> 
> I think that refusing to suspend wouldn't be a good approach (think of an
> emergency suspend when the battery is running low).
> 
> Probably the closing of connections would be the nicest thing from the
> user's point of view.

It depends on "how long does connection close take". If it is more
than few seconds, kill them abruptly.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-08 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-09 21:57 NAK new drivers without proper power management? Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-09 22:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-09 22:26   ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-09 22:44     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-09 22:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-09 22:51       ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-09 22:51         ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-09 23:12         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-09 23:12           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-09 23:28           ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-09 23:28             ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-10  0:12             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-10  0:12               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-10  0:25     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-10  6:43       ` Willy Tarreau
2007-02-10 23:52         ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-02-10  7:15     ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-10 19:38   ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-10 22:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-10 22:37       ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-10 23:45         ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-02-11  0:27           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-11 22:41             ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-13 15:55               ` Mark Lord
2007-02-13 16:06                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-02-11 22:37           ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-12  0:10             ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-02-12  0:20               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-12  4:08               ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-12 20:06                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-12 22:38                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-03-03 22:48               ` Suspend/resume semantics for ISDN drivers (was: NAK new drivers without proper power management?) Tilman Schmidt
2007-03-04 19:04                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-08 23:35                   ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-02-11  6:46         ` NAK new drivers without proper power management? Willy Tarreau
2007-02-11 13:04           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-11 22:47           ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-11 22:57             ` Manu Abraham
2007-02-11 23:20               ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-11 23:25                 ` Manu Abraham
2007-02-11 23:29                   ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-11 23:33                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-12 16:52                     ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-12 20:31                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-12 20:58                         ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-12 21:01                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-12 21:24                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-12 21:43                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-13  9:42                         ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-02-13 19:24                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-14 23:45                             ` Stefan Richter
2007-02-12  9:45                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-12 12:59           ` Gerhard Mack
2007-02-12 20:20             ` Willy Tarreau
2007-02-13 15:23               ` Brad Campbell
2007-02-12 20:46             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-12 13:51           ` Tino Keitel
2007-02-11 19:42       ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-11 21:02         ` Alan
2007-02-11 23:04           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-12  0:28             ` Alan
2007-02-12  0:24               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-11 23:10           ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-11 23:16             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-11 23:22               ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-11 23:23                 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-11 23:21             ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-11 23:29               ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-11 22:21         ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-02-12  8:49       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-02-12 15:04         ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-12 15:57           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-02-12 16:55             ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-12 20:38             ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-13 10:02             ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-02-10  3:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-02-10  4:42   ` Nigel Cunningham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070308233520.GD2793@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tilman@imap.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.