2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.28, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-03-03      108       33          28
  2009-02-24       95       32          24
  2009-02-14       85       33          27
  2009-02-08       82       45          36
  2009-02-04       66       51          39
  2009-01-20       38       35          27
  2009-01-11       13       13          10


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
Subject		: iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
Handled-By	: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12808
Subject		: Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-24 19:08 (8 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123550257312112&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
Subject		: i915 broken STR
Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12805
Subject		: QinQ vlan trunking regression
Submitter	: Bart Trojanowski <bart-LIbhotJ4rFdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-28 18:05 (4 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123584439115868&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12804
Subject		: some tc commands fail
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-03-02 0:36 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123595420013357&w=4
Handled-By	: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12800
Subject		: x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions
Submitter	: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-03-02 01:40 (2 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12792
Subject		: 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure
Submitter	: Sachin P. Sant <sachinp-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-27 23:19 (5 days old)
References	: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-February/068771.html


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12778
Subject		: regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6
Submitter	: yury <urykhy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-25 09:25 (7 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
Subject		: Oops in i915_gem_flush
Submitter	: Kalev Lember <kalev-KfhB8dnw0QSuvFJfX82//w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-24 08:35 (8 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769
Subject		: 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)
Submitter	: Michael <auslands-kv-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-23 23:36 (9 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Subject		: i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-21 15:38 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123523074304955&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
Subject		: Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763
Subject		: Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1
Submitter	: Matthew A. Bockol <mbockol-dmoCqaWXHRX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-21 5:42 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Subject		: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter	: Heinz Diehl <htd-HjJ2MNWy62to6+H+lsi3Gti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681
Subject		: s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)
Submitter	: Orivej Desh <smpuj-5URONGGNgjI@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-09 13:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cfe62c8010ac56e1bd3827e30386a87cc2f3594


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
Subject		: Entropy pool problem
Submitter	: Valentin QUEQUET <v.quequet-techniques-1tsiiZ//OF9QFI55V6+gNQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-09 09:12 (23 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12670
Subject		: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21
Submitter	: Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-08 11:04 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123409113223833&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12668
Subject		: USB flash disk surprise disconnect
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-08 10:21 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123408851821292&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject		: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
Subject		: build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
Subject		: Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-13 18:34 (50 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123187185426236&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Subject		: new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter	: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-12 15:46 (51 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4
Handled-By	: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12490
Subject		: ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter	: Sergey S. Kostyliov <rathamahata-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-12 7:38 (51 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123174591509586&w=4
Handled-By	: Bob Copeland <me-aXfl/3sk2vNUbtYUoyoikg@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444
Subject		: X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
Submitter	: Graham Murray <graham-0mDQKtL6jrwDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-13 14:03 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Subject		: possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
Submitter	: Wang Chen <wangchen-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-08 14:11 (55 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=546b0974c39657017407c86fe79811100b60700d
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Subject		: Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
Submitter	: Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-07 22:43 (56 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
Subject		: iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
Submitter	: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-05 4:13 (58 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12811
Subject		: undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc
Submitter	: Rogério Brito <rbrito-qczF+2RCDl1fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-03-02 9:43 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123598702511826&w=4
Handled-By	: Rogério Brito <rbrito-qczF+2RCDl1fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123606933628020&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
Subject		: Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
Handled-By	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
Subject		: Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Submitter	: J.A. Magallón <jamagallon-sh/6fXdz2Rs@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-17 8:52 (15 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123486078219980&w=4
Handled-By	: Brian Haley <brian.haley-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123517631120945&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12671
Subject		: uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-08 14:58 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123410529909318&w=4
Handled-By	: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/15/172


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12667
Subject		: Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
Submitter	: Paul Collins <paul-dsjeNyW6Qm/D+ROgJ3VA+kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-21 7:15 (42 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1c5745aa380efb6417b5681104b007c8612fb496
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123252215315106&w=4
Handled-By	: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/16/78


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.28,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12398

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.28, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-03-03      108       33          28
  2009-02-24       95       32          24
  2009-02-14       85       33          27
  2009-02-08       82       45          36
  2009-02-04       66       51          39
  2009-01-20       38       35          27
  2009-01-11       13       13          10


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
Subject		: iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date		: 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
Handled-By	: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12808
Subject		: Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-02-24 19:08 (8 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123550257312112&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
Subject		: i915 broken STR
Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12805
Subject		: QinQ vlan trunking regression
Submitter	: Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>
Date		: 2009-02-28 18:05 (4 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123584439115868&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12804
Subject		: some tc commands fail
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-03-02 0:36 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123595420013357&w=4
Handled-By	: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12800
Subject		: x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions
Submitter	: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Date		: 2009-03-02 01:40 (2 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12792
Subject		: 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure
Submitter	: Sachin P. Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Date		: 2009-02-27 23:19 (5 days old)
References	: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-February/068771.html


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12778
Subject		: regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6
Submitter	: yury <urykhy@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-02-25 09:25 (7 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
Subject		: Oops in i915_gem_flush
Submitter	: Kalev Lember <kalev@colleduc.ee>
Date		: 2009-02-24 08:35 (8 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769
Subject		: 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)
Submitter	: Michael <auslands-kv@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-02-23 23:36 (9 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Subject		: i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Date		: 2009-02-21 15:38 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123523074304955&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
Subject		: Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763
Subject		: Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1
Submitter	: Matthew A. Bockol <mbockol@carleton.edu>
Date		: 2009-02-21 5:42 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Subject		: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter	: Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Date		: 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681
Subject		: s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)
Submitter	: Orivej Desh <smpuj@bk.ru>
Date		: 2009-02-09 13:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cfe62c8010ac56e1bd3827e30386a87cc2f3594


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
Subject		: Entropy pool problem
Submitter	: Valentin QUEQUET <v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr>
Date		: 2009-02-09 09:12 (23 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12670
Subject		: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21
Submitter	: Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-02-08 11:04 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123409113223833&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12668
Subject		: USB flash disk surprise disconnect
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-02-08 10:21 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123408851821292&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject		: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
Subject		: build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date		: 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
Subject		: Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-01-13 18:34 (50 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123187185426236&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Subject		: new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter	: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date		: 2009-01-12 15:46 (51 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4
Handled-By	: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12490
Subject		: ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter	: Sergey S. Kostyliov <rathamahata@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-01-12 7:38 (51 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123174591509586&w=4
Handled-By	: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444
Subject		: X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
Submitter	: Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk>
Date		: 2009-01-13 14:03 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Subject		: possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
Submitter	: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date		: 2009-01-08 14:11 (55 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=546b0974c39657017407c86fe79811100b60700d
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Subject		: Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
Submitter	: Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date		: 2009-01-07 22:43 (56 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
Subject		: iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
Submitter	: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-01-05 4:13 (58 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12811
Subject		: undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc
Submitter	: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Date		: 2009-03-02 9:43 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123598702511826&w=4
Handled-By	: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123606933628020&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
Subject		: Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Date		: 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
Handled-By	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
Subject		: Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Submitter	: J.A. Magallón <jamagallon@ono.com>
Date		: 2009-02-17 8:52 (15 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123486078219980&w=4
Handled-By	: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123517631120945&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12671
Subject		: uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date		: 2009-02-08 14:58 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123410529909318&w=4
Handled-By	: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/15/172


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12667
Subject		: Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
Submitter	: Paul Collins <paul@burly.ondioline.org>
Date		: 2009-01-21 7:15 (42 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1c5745aa380efb6417b5681104b007c8612fb496
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123252215315106&w=4
Handled-By	: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/16/78


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.28,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12398

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

[Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
Subject		: iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
Submitter	: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-01-05 4:13 (58 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4

[Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
Subject		: iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
Submitter	: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-05 4:13 (58 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4

[Bug #12418] Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Subject		: Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
Submitter	: Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date		: 2009-01-07 22:43 (56 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4

[Bug #12419] possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Subject		: possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
Submitter	: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date		: 2009-01-08 14:11 (55 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=546b0974c39657017407c86fe79811100b60700d
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4

[Bug #12444] X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444
Subject		: X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
Submitter	: Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk>
Date		: 2009-01-13 14:03 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a

[Bug #12490] ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12490
Subject		: ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter	: Sergey S. Kostyliov <rathamahata@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-01-12 7:38 (51 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123174591509586&w=4
Handled-By	: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>

[Bug #12497] new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Subject		: new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter	: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date		: 2009-01-12 15:46 (51 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4
Handled-By	: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

[Bug #12499] Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
Subject		: Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-01-13 18:34 (50 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123187185426236&w=4

[Bug #12419] possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Subject		: possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
Submitter	: Wang Chen <wangchen-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-08 14:11 (55 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=546b0974c39657017407c86fe79811100b60700d
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4

[Bug #12444] X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444
Subject		: X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
Submitter	: Graham Murray <graham-0mDQKtL6jrwDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-13 14:03 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a

[Bug #12497] new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Subject		: new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter	: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-12 15:46 (51 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4
Handled-By	: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12490] ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12490
Subject		: ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter	: Sergey S. Kostyliov <rathamahata-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-12 7:38 (51 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123174591509586&w=4
Handled-By	: Bob Copeland <me-aXfl/3sk2vNUbtYUoyoikg@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12418] Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Subject		: Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
Submitter	: Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-07 22:43 (56 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4

[Bug #12499] Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
Subject		: Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-13 18:34 (50 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123187185426236&w=4

[Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
Subject		: build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date		: 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315

[Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject		: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205

[Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12667
Subject		: Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
Submitter	: Paul Collins <paul@burly.ondioline.org>
Date		: 2009-01-21 7:15 (42 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1c5745aa380efb6417b5681104b007c8612fb496
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123252215315106&w=4
Handled-By	: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/16/78

[Bug #12668] USB flash disk surprise disconnect

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12668
Subject		: USB flash disk surprise disconnect
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-02-08 10:21 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123408851821292&w=4

[Bug #12668] USB flash disk surprise disconnect

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12668
Subject		: USB flash disk surprise disconnect
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-08 10:21 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123408851821292&w=4

[Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12667
Subject		: Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
Submitter	: Paul Collins <paul-dsjeNyW6Qm/D+ROgJ3VA+kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-21 7:15 (42 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1c5745aa380efb6417b5681104b007c8612fb496
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123252215315106&w=4
Handled-By	: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/16/78

[Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
Subject		: build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315

[Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject		: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205

[Bug #12670] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12670
Subject		: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21
Submitter	: Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-02-08 11:04 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123409113223833&w=4

[Bug #12680] Entropy pool problem

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
Subject		: Entropy pool problem
Submitter	: Valentin QUEQUET <v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr>
Date		: 2009-02-09 09:12 (23 days old)

[Bug #12671] uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12671
Subject		: uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date		: 2009-02-08 14:58 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123410529909318&w=4
Handled-By	: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/15/172

[Bug #12681] s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681
Subject		: s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)
Submitter	: Orivej Desh <smpuj@bk.ru>
Date		: 2009-02-09 13:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cfe62c8010ac56e1bd3827e30386a87cc2f3594

[Bug #12681] s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681
Subject		: s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)
Submitter	: Orivej Desh <smpuj-5URONGGNgjI@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-09 13:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cfe62c8010ac56e1bd3827e30386a87cc2f3594

[Bug #12670] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12670
Subject		: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21
Submitter	: Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-08 11:04 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123409113223833&w=4

[Bug #12680] Entropy pool problem

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
Subject		: Entropy pool problem
Submitter	: Valentin QUEQUET <v.quequet-techniques-1tsiiZ//OF9QFI55V6+gNQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-09 09:12 (23 days old)

[Bug #12671] uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12671
Subject		: uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-08 14:58 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123410529909318&w=4
Handled-By	: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/15/172

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>

[Bug #12758] ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Subject		: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter	: Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Date		: 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4

[Bug #12761] Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
Subject		: Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Submitter	: J.A. Magallón <jamagallon@ono.com>
Date		: 2009-02-17 8:52 (15 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123486078219980&w=4
Handled-By	: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123517631120945&w=4

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12758] ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Subject		: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter	: Heinz Diehl <htd-HjJ2MNWy62to6+H+lsi3Gti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4

[Bug #12761] Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
Subject		: Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Submitter	: J.A. Magallón <jamagallon-sh/6fXdz2Rs@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-17 8:52 (15 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123486078219980&w=4
Handled-By	: Brian Haley <brian.haley-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123517631120945&w=4

[Bug #12763] Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763
Subject		: Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1
Submitter	: Matthew A. Bockol <mbockol@carleton.edu>
Date		: 2009-02-21 5:42 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4

[Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
Subject		: Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Date		: 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
Handled-By	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4

[Bug #12764] Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
Subject		: Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4

[Bug #12763] Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763
Subject		: Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1
Submitter	: Matthew A. Bockol <mbockol-dmoCqaWXHRX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-21 5:42 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4

[Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
Subject		: Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
Handled-By	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4

[Bug #12764] Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
Subject		: Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4

[Bug #12765] i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Subject		: i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Date		: 2009-02-21 15:38 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123523074304955&w=4

[Bug #12769] 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769
Subject		: 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)
Submitter	: Michael <auslands-kv@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-02-23 23:36 (9 days old)

[Bug #12778] regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12778
Subject		: regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6
Submitter	: yury <urykhy@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-02-25 09:25 (7 days old)

[Bug #12792] 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12792
Subject		: 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure
Submitter	: Sachin P. Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Date		: 2009-02-27 23:19 (5 days old)
References	: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-February/068771.html

[Bug #12771] Oops in i915_gem_flush

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
Subject		: Oops in i915_gem_flush
Submitter	: Kalev Lember <kalev@colleduc.ee>
Date		: 2009-02-24 08:35 (8 days old)

[Bug #12771] Oops in i915_gem_flush

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
Subject		: Oops in i915_gem_flush
Submitter	: Kalev Lember <kalev-KfhB8dnw0QSuvFJfX82//w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-24 08:35 (8 days old)

[Bug #12769] 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769
Subject		: 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)
Submitter	: Michael <auslands-kv-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-23 23:36 (9 days old)

[Bug #12778] regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12778
Subject		: regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6
Submitter	: yury <urykhy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-25 09:25 (7 days old)

[Bug #12765] i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Subject		: i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-21 15:38 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123523074304955&w=4

[Bug #12792] 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12792
Subject		: 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure
Submitter	: Sachin P. Sant <sachinp-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-27 23:19 (5 days old)
References	: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-February/068771.html

[Bug #12800] x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12800
Subject		: x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions
Submitter	: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Date		: 2009-03-02 01:40 (2 days old)

[Bug #12804] some tc commands fail

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12804
Subject		: some tc commands fail
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-03-02 0:36 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123595420013357&w=4
Handled-By	: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>

[Bug #12805] QinQ vlan trunking regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12805
Subject		: QinQ vlan trunking regression
Submitter	: Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>
Date		: 2009-02-28 18:05 (4 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123584439115868&w=4

[Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
Subject		: i915 broken STR
Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4

[Bug #12805] QinQ vlan trunking regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12805
Subject		: QinQ vlan trunking regression
Submitter	: Bart Trojanowski <bart-LIbhotJ4rFdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-28 18:05 (4 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123584439115868&w=4

[Bug #12804] some tc commands fail

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12804
Subject		: some tc commands fail
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-03-02 0:36 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123595420013357&w=4
Handled-By	: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12800] x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12800
Subject		: x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions
Submitter	: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-03-02 01:40 (2 days old)

[Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
Subject		: i915 broken STR
Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4

[Bug #12811] undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12811
Subject		: undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc
Submitter	: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Date		: 2009-03-02 9:43 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123598702511826&w=4
Handled-By	: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123606933628020&w=4

[Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
Subject		: iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date		: 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
Handled-By	: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>

[Bug #12808] Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12808
Subject		: Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-02-24 19:08 (8 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123550257312112&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

[Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
Subject		: iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
Handled-By	: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12808] Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12808
Subject		: Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-24 19:08 (8 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123550257312112&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12811] undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12811
Subject		: undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc
Submitter	: Rogério Brito <rbrito-qczF+2RCDl1fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-03-02 9:43 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123598702511826&w=4
Handled-By	: Rogério Brito <rbrito-qczF+2RCDl1fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123606933628020&w=4

Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29

[James Bottomley]

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
> Subject		: Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
> Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
> Date		: 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
> Handled-By	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
> Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4

In theory, the fix should be upstream here:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00

(not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).

James

Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29

[James Bottomley]

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
> Subject		: Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
> Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
> Handled-By	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4

In theory, the fix should be upstream here:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00

(not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).

James

Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 03 March 2009, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
> > Subject		: Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
> > Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
> > Date		: 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
> > Handled-By	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
> > Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4
> 
> In theory, the fix should be upstream here:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00
> 
> (not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 03 March 2009, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
> > Subject		: Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
> > Submitter	: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
> > Handled-By	: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4
> 
> In theory, the fix should be upstream here:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00
> 
> (not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> Subject         : possible circular locking dependency detected
> Submitter       : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
> Date            : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
>
>
>

I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.

Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> Subject         : possible circular locking dependency detected
> Submitter       : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
>
>
>

I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.

Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> > Subject         : possible circular locking dependency detected
> > Submitter       : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
> > Date            : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
> >
> >
> >
> 
> I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.

OK, I'm going to close it, then.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> > Subject         : possible circular locking dependency detected
> > Submitter       : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date            : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
> >
> >
> >
> 
> I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.

OK, I'm going to close it, then.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Zhang Rui]

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> 
the problem has already been fixed by
3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048

thanks,
rui

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Zhang Rui]

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> 
the problem has already been fixed by
3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048

thanks,
rui

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Ingo Molnar]

* Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> > Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> > 
> the problem has already been fixed by
> 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048

yes - please consider it fixed.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Ingo Molnar]

* Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> > 
> the problem has already been fixed by
> 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048

yes - please consider it fixed.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Ingo Molnar]

* Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> > 
> the problem has already been fixed by
> 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048

yes - please consider it fixed.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Zhang Rui]

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> Subject         : X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> Submitter       : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
> Date            : 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> Handled-By      : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> 

e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799 is first bad commit
commit e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
Author: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Date:   Thu Jan 22 09:56:58 2009 -0800

    drm/i915: Suppress GEM teardown on X Server exit in KMS mode.
    
    Fixes hangs when starting X for the second time.
    
    Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
    Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2

thanks,
rui

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Zhang Rui]

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
> Subject         : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
> Submitter       : Heinz Diehl <htd-HjJ2MNWy62to6+H+lsi3Gti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
> 
Handled by: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch-available:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view

not sure if this patch is in len's tree or not.

thanks,
rui

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Zhang Rui]

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
> Subject         : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
> Submitter       : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
> Date            : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
> 
Handled by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Patch-available:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view

not sure if this patch is in len's tree or not.

thanks,
rui

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Nico Schottelius]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 652 bytes --]

Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).

Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.

Nico

-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Nico Schottelius]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 652 bytes --]

Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).

Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.

Nico

-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c

[Pekka Enberg]

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315

There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view

Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c

[Pekka Enberg]

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315

There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Harvey Harrison]

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> Subject		: i915 broken STR
> Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> 

Still present in -rc7, let me know what info you need to help debug.

Harvey

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Harvey Harrison]

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> Subject		: i915 broken STR
> Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> 

Still present in -rc7, let me know what info you need to help debug.

Harvey

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Maciej Rutecki]

2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>:

>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> Subject         : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> Submitter       : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
> Date            : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4

Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7

-- 
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.maciek.unixy.pl

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Maciej Rutecki]

2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:

>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> Subject         : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> Submitter       : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
> Date            : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4

Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7

-- 
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.maciek.unixy.pl

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Maciej Rutecki]

2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:

>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> Subject         : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> Submitter       : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
> Date            : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4

Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7

-- 
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.maciek.unixy.pl
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:42:36PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> > > Subject         : possible circular locking dependency detected
> > > Submitter       : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
> > > Date            : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> > > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.
> 
> OK, I'm going to close it, then.

Spoke too soon.
I see this again on 2.6.29-rc7.

Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:42:36PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> > > Subject         : possible circular locking dependency detected
> > > Submitter       : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date            : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> > > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.
> 
> OK, I'm going to close it, then.

Spoke too soon.
I see this again on 2.6.29-rc7.

Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6

[Wu Fengguang]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
> Subject		: iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
> Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> Date		: 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
> Handled-By	: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>

Following Peter's idea of relaxing writeback throttling, Lin Ming
and I tried the idea of totally disabling writeback throttling by
doing benchmarks with the following parameters:

        echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
        echo 50 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio

The result is encouraging: the iozone performance is restored to the
level of 2.6.29-rc5!

We'll continue to evaluate the dirty/throttling numbers with Nick's patch.

Thanks,
Fengguang

Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6

[Wu Fengguang]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
> Subject		: iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
> Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
> Handled-By	: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Following Peter's idea of relaxing writeback throttling, Lin Ming
and I tried the idea of totally disabling writeback throttling by
doing benchmarks with the following parameters:

        echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
        echo 50 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio

The result is encouraging: the iozone performance is restored to the
level of 2.6.29-rc5!

We'll continue to evaluate the dirty/throttling numbers with Nick's patch.

Thanks,
Fengguang

Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6

[Peter Zijlstra]

(list restored)

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 10:13 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:

> My idea:
> 1) When the main thread traps into kernel and find need to write back pages; it just starts
> write back, but it needn't change timestamp (???or something like that) on writeback; and start
> pdflush;
> 2) Later on pdflush could pick up the file to write back for other pages on the same file;
> 3) The target is to let pdflush to writeback pages and main testing thread continues on its own
> work, so we can benefit from SMP.

No!

This is not about parallelism, this is about making sure there is a
limited number of dirty pages, that means the tasks generating dirty
pages will _have_ to wait. You simply cannot delegate that.

Furthermore, the task throttling explicitly wants to throttle the task
that generates all those dirty pages more than other tasks. So pushing
the throttle out to pdflush will destroy the whole scheme.

The reason we want to make the heavy dirtier throttle sooner is that
other tasks, who only occasionally dirty a page, don't get caught in the
massive throttle latency.

Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29

[Sitsofe Wheeler]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:07:29PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> In theory, the fix should be upstream here:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00
> 
> (not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).

Yup - just tested -rc7 and the problem is gone. Thanks!

-- 
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/

Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29

[Sitsofe Wheeler]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:07:29PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> In theory, the fix should be upstream here:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00
> 
> (not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).

Yup - just tested -rc7 and the problem is gone. Thanks!

-- 
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Harvey Harrison]

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> Subject		: i915 broken STR
> Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> 
> 

This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.

Harvey

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Harvey Harrison]

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> Subject		: i915 broken STR
> Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> 
> 

This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.

Harvey

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > Subject		: i915 broken STR
> > Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> > Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > 
> > 
> 
> This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.

Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.

Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
on the Harvey's hardware?

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > Subject		: i915 broken STR
> > Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > 
> > 
> 
> This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.

Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.

Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
on the Harvey's hardware?

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> 
> There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:
> 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view

Thanks, updated.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> > Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> 
> There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:
> 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view

Thanks, updated.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
> Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
> there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.

Well, thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
> Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
> there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.

Well, thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday 05 March 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
> > Subject		: iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
> > Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> > Date		: 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> 
> Following Peter's idea of relaxing writeback throttling, Lin Ming
> and I tried the idea of totally disabling writeback throttling by
> doing benchmarks with the following parameters:
> 
>         echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
>         echo 50 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
> 
> The result is encouraging: the iozone performance is restored to the
> level of 2.6.29-rc5!
> 
> We'll continue to evaluate the dirty/throttling numbers with Nick's patch.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday 05 March 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
> > Subject		: iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
> > Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Following Peter's idea of relaxing writeback throttling, Lin Ming
> and I tried the idea of totally disabling writeback throttling by
> doing benchmarks with the following parameters:
> 
>         echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
>         echo 50 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
> 
> The result is encouraging: the iozone performance is restored to the
> level of 2.6.29-rc5!
> 
> We'll continue to evaluate the dirty/throttling numbers with Nick's patch.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> > 
> the problem has already been fixed by
> 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> > 
> the problem has already been fixed by
> 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> > Subject         : X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> > Submitter       : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date            : 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> > Handled-By      : Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> 
> e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799 is first bad commit
> commit e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
> Author: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
> Date:   Thu Jan 22 09:56:58 2009 -0800
> 
>     drm/i915: Suppress GEM teardown on X Server exit in KMS mode.
>     
>     Fixes hangs when starting X for the second time.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
>     Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied-cv59FeDIM0c@public.gmane.org>
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2

Thanks, updated.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> > Subject         : X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> > Submitter       : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
> > Date            : 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> > Handled-By      : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > 
> 
> e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799 is first bad commit
> commit e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
> Author: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
> Date:   Thu Jan 22 09:56:58 2009 -0800
> 
>     drm/i915: Suppress GEM teardown on X Server exit in KMS mode.
>     
>     Fixes hangs when starting X for the second time.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
>     Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2

Thanks, updated.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
> > Subject         : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
> > Submitter       : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
> > Date            : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
> > 
> Handled by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Patch-available:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view
> 
> not sure if this patch is in len's tree or not.

Thanks, updated.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> 2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>:
> 
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> > Subject         : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> > Submitter       : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date            : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
> 
> Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> 2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> 
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> > Subject         : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> > Submitter       : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
> > Date            : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
> 
> Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> 2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> 
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> > Subject         : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> > Submitter       : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
> > Date            : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
> 
> Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12444] X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected

[Graham Murray]

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444
> Subject		: X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
> Submitter	: Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk>
> Date		: 2009-01-13 14:03 (50 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a

I am still seeing the same symptoms in 2.6.29-rc7-0003-g559595a.

Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c

[Johannes Weiner]

On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > > Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > > Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > > Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> > 
> > There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:
> > 
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view
> 
> Thanks, updated.

This fix is upstream: 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048

Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c

[Johannes Weiner]

On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > > Subject         : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > > Submitter       : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date            : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> > 
> > There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:
> > 
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view
> 
> Thanks, updated.

This fix is upstream: 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Eric Anholt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1553 bytes --]

On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > Subject		: i915 broken STR
> > > Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> > > Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> 
> Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> 
> Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> on the Harvey's hardware?

There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
started.  If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.

-- 
Eric Anholt
eric@anholt.net                         eric.anholt@intel.com



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Harvey Harrison]

On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 19:23 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > On > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > 
> > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > 
> > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > on the Harvey's hardware?
> 
> There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> started.  If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
> 

Yep, turns out I had KMS turned on in my config...I thought I'd disabled
it, sorry for the noise.

Harvey

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Harvey Harrison]

On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 19:23 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > On > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > 
> > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > 
> > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > on the Harvey's hardware?
> 
> There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> started.  If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
> 

Yep, turns out I had KMS turned on in my config...I thought I'd disabled
it, sorry for the noise.

Harvey

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > 
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > (either way).
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > Subject		: i915 broken STR
> > > > Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> > > > Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > 
> > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > 
> > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > on the Harvey's hardware?
> 
> There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> started.  If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.

BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
driver?

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > 
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > (either way).
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > Subject		: i915 broken STR
> > > > Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > > Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > 
> > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > 
> > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > on the Harvey's hardware?
> 
> There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> started.  If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.

BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
driver?

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Eric Anholt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2456 bytes --]

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > (either way).
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > > Subject		: i915 broken STR
> > > > > Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> > > > > Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > > 
> > > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > > 
> > > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > > on the Harvey's hardware?
> > 
> > There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> > guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> > started.  If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
> 
> BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
> driver?

I pulled a giant pile of KMS bugfixes into 2.6.2, so I'm not sure about
2.6.1.

We've still got some work to do with making our suspend/resume path
really complete for KMS.  We're missing some register setup that UMS
does, so behavior can be a bit random.  The current plan is to switch to
using the KMS modeset paths for resume, so we hopefully have reliable
(or at least consistent) mode setting behavior, and then fill those
remaining register writes in around it.  Basically, a separate
suspend/resume path for KMS, when we have full control of the device.

-- 
Eric Anholt
eric@anholt.net                         eric.anholt@intel.com



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Eric Anholt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2545 bytes --]

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > (either way).
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > > Subject		: i915 broken STR
> > > > > Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > > 
> > > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > > 
> > > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > > on the Harvey's hardware?
> > 
> > There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> > guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> > started.  If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
> 
> BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
> driver?

I pulled a giant pile of KMS bugfixes into 2.6.2, so I'm not sure about
2.6.1.

We've still got some work to do with making our suspend/resume path
really complete for KMS.  We're missing some register setup that UMS
does, so behavior can be a bit random.  The current plan is to switch to
using the KMS modeset paths for resume, so we hopefully have reliable
(or at least consistent) mode setting behavior, and then fill those
remaining register writes in around it.  Basically, a separate
suspend/resume path for KMS, when we have full control of the device.

-- 
Eric Anholt
eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org                         eric.anholt-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > > (either way).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > > > Subject		: i915 broken STR
> > > > > > Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > > > 
> > > > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > > > 
> > > > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > > > on the Harvey's hardware?
> > > 
> > > There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> > > guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> > > started.  If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
> > 
> > BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
> > driver?
> 
> I pulled a giant pile of KMS bugfixes into 2.6.2, so I'm not sure about
> 2.6.1.
> 
> We've still got some work to do with making our suspend/resume path
> really complete for KMS.  We're missing some register setup that UMS
> does, so behavior can be a bit random.  The current plan is to switch to
> using the KMS modeset paths for resume, so we hopefully have reliable
> (or at least consistent) mode setting behavior, and then fill those
> remaining register writes in around it.  Basically, a separate
> suspend/resume path for KMS, when we have full control of the device.

OK, thanks.

Best,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > > (either way).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > > > Subject		: i915 broken STR
> > > > > > Submitter	: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > > Date		: 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > > > 
> > > > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > > > 
> > > > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > > > on the Harvey's hardware?
> > > 
> > > There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> > > guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> > > started.  If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
> > 
> > BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
> > driver?
> 
> I pulled a giant pile of KMS bugfixes into 2.6.2, so I'm not sure about
> 2.6.1.
> 
> We've still got some work to do with making our suspend/resume path
> really complete for KMS.  We're missing some register setup that UMS
> does, so behavior can be a bit random.  The current plan is to switch to
> using the KMS modeset paths for resume, so we hopefully have reliable
> (or at least consistent) mode setting behavior, and then fill those
> remaining register writes in around it.  Basically, a separate
> suspend/resume path for KMS, when we have full control of the device.

OK, thanks.

Best,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Len Brown]

On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > 
> > Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
> > there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.
> 
> Well, thanks for the update.

It is a DRI bug, assigned to   	
Eric Anholt -- I'm not handling it.


thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Len Brown]

On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > 
> > Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
> > there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.
> 
> Well, thanks for the update.

It is a DRI bug, assigned to   	
Eric Anholt -- I'm not handling it.


thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Len Brown]

On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
> > > Subject         : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
> > > Submitter       : Heinz Diehl <htd-HjJ2MNWy62to6+H+lsi3Gti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date            : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
> > > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
> > > 
> > Handled by: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch-available:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view
> > 
> > not sure if this patch is in len's tree or not.
> 
> Thanks, updated.


per the bug report, this shipped in 2.6.29-rc8:

commit 7b46ecd5fcebf381a7bde966db352d8fb1b8e944
Author: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Wed Feb 25 18:00:18 2009 -0500

    Revert "ACPI: make some IO ports off-limits to AML"

Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

[Len Brown]

On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
> > > Subject         : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
> > > Submitter       : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
> > > Date            : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
> > > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
> > > 
> > Handled by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> > Patch-available:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view
> > 
> > not sure if this patch is in len's tree or not.
> 
> Thanks, updated.


per the bug report, this shipped in 2.6.29-rc8:

commit 7b46ecd5fcebf381a7bde966db352d8fb1b8e944
Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Feb 25 18:00:18 2009 -0500

    Revert "ACPI: make some IO ports off-limits to AML"

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (115 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (115 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (107 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (107 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (101 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (101 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (93 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (93 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Nico Schottelius]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 268 bytes --]

Update:

  Brightness works on 2.6.30-rc3-next-20090428-04067-g72f1b63 (linux-next)

-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Nico Schottelius]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 268 bytes --]

Update:

  Brightness works on 2.6.30-rc3-next-20090428-04067-g72f1b63 (linux-next)

-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Niel Lambrechts]

On 04/26/2009 10:20 PM, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki [Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:46:25AM +0200]:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
> 
> Sure, still broken. For some version it works, for most newer not,
> as reported.
> 
> Can we stop that nag-service and spent time in fixing it better?

You should rather be quiet about the time people are investing in this
community, especially when others strongly differ from you the merit of
that service.

Without Rafael's reports some of the regressions I have posted probably
would have not been investigated at all.

Niel
--

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday 26 April 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki [Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:46:25AM +0200]:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
> 
> Sure, still broken. For some version it works, for most newer not,
> as reported.
> 
> Can we stop that nag-service and spent time in fixing it better?

Well, I'm not familiar with the code that broke and this is a way of notifying
the right people of the problem.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday 26 April 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki [Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:46:25AM +0200]:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
> 
> Sure, still broken. For some version it works, for most newer not,
> as reported.
> 
> Can we stop that nag-service and spent time in fixing it better?

Well, I'm not familiar with the code that broke and this is a way of notifying
the right people of the problem.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Nico Schottelius]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 528 bytes --]

Rafael J. Wysocki [Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:46:25AM +0200]:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.

Sure, still broken. For some version it works, for most newer not,
as reported.

Can we stop that nag-service and spent time in fixing it better?

Nico

-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (73 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Nico Schottelius]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]

Nico Schottelius [Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:35:32PM +0200]:
> Brightness is *AGAIN* broken in 2.6.30-rc2-00195-g9f76208.

2.6.30-rc2-next-20090420:

My display *is* at full brightness, but I cannot adjust it,
because I'm missing some files:

[12:35] ikn:~# ls /sys/class/video_output 
[12:35] ikn:~# ls /sys/class/backlight   
[12:35] ikn:~# ls /proc/acpi           
ac_adapter  debug_layer  embedded_controller  fan   power_resource  thermal_zone
battery     debug_level  event          ibm   processor     wakeup
button      dsdt   fadt         info  sleep

So I cannot adjust brightness. I saw that
/proc/acpi/video/VID/LCD0/brightness was not existing on 2.6.30-rc2-00195-g9f76208
either.

Bug or am I missing some new file location?

Nico

-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Nico Schottelius]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]

Nico Schottelius [Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:35:32PM +0200]:
> Brightness is *AGAIN* broken in 2.6.30-rc2-00195-g9f76208.

2.6.30-rc2-next-20090420:

My display *is* at full brightness, but I cannot adjust it,
because I'm missing some files:

[12:35] ikn:~# ls /sys/class/video_output 
[12:35] ikn:~# ls /sys/class/backlight   
[12:35] ikn:~# ls /proc/acpi           
ac_adapter  debug_layer  embedded_controller  fan   power_resource  thermal_zone
battery     debug_level  event          ibm   processor     wakeup
button      dsdt   fadt         info  sleep

So I cannot adjust brightness. I saw that
/proc/acpi/video/VID/LCD0/brightness was not existing on 2.6.30-rc2-00195-g9f76208
either.

Bug or am I missing some new file location?

Nico

-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Len Brown wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> > Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> > Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
> > Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (53 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> > 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
> 
> > Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> 
> Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

Updated.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Len Brown wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> > Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> > Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (53 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> > 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
> 
> > Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>

Updated.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Len Brown]

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
> Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (53 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2

> Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>

Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Len Brown]

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (53 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2

> Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Handled-By	: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (37 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (37 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (30 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (30 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Still existing.

Thanks for the update.

> Rafael J. Wysocki [Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:48:13PM +0100]:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> > Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> > Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
> > Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (11 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Still existing.

Thanks for the update.

> Rafael J. Wysocki [Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:48:13PM +0100]:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> > Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> > Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (11 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Nico Schottelius]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 898 bytes --]

Still existing.

Rafael J. Wysocki [Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:48:13PM +0100]:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
> Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (11 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> 
> 

-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Nico Schottelius]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 951 bytes --]

Still existing.

Rafael J. Wysocki [Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:48:13PM +0100]:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (11 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> 
> 

-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Nico Schottelius]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 709 bytes --]

Jesse Barnes [Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:23:57PM -0800]:
> On Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:13 pm Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > This was drm failing to initialise because of incorrect mtrr setup and
> > opregion not working as a result.
> 
> I sent one out; it just made the ioremap in i915_initialize into an ioremap_wc 
> for consistency.

If you refer to <200902131104.04318.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
as stated in <20090216131351.GA4839@denkbrett.schottelius.org>, it does not
fix the problem here.

Sincerly,

Nico

-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Jesse Barnes]

On Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:13 pm Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:05:25PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 13:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > > > know (either way).
> > >
> > > I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?
> >
> > I haven't done anything in the area of brightness control.
>
> This was drm failing to initialise because of incorrect mtrr setup and
> opregion not working as a result.

I sent one out; it just made the ioremap in i915_initialize into an ioremap_wc 
for consistency.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Jesse Barnes]

On Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:13 pm Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:05:25PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 13:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > > > know (either way).
> > >
> > > I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?
> >
> > I haven't done anything in the area of brightness control.
>
> This was drm failing to initialise because of incorrect mtrr setup and
> opregion not working as a result.

I sent one out; it just made the ioremap in i915_initialize into an ioremap_wc 
for consistency.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Matthew Garrett]

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:05:25PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 13:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > 
> > I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?
> 
> I haven't done anything in the area of brightness control.

This was drm failing to initialise because of incorrect mtrr setup and 
opregion not working as a result.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Matthew Garrett]

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:05:25PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 13:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > 
> > I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?
> 
> I haven't done anything in the area of brightness control.

This was drm failing to initialise because of incorrect mtrr setup and 
opregion not working as a result.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Eric Anholt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 521 bytes --]

On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 13:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
> I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?

I haven't done anything in the area of brightness control.

-- 
Eric Anholt
eric@anholt.net                         eric.anholt@intel.com



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Eric Anholt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 580 bytes --]

On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 13:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
> I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?

I haven't done anything in the area of brightness control.

-- 
Eric Anholt
eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org                         eric.anholt-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday 15 February 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
> I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?

I haven't found it.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday 15 February 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
> I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?

I haven't found it.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Matthew Garrett]

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).

I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Matthew Garrett]

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).

I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>

[Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject		: X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-13 9:33 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By	: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>