* 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
@ 2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.28, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-03-03 108 33 28
2009-02-24 95 32 24
2009-02-14 85 33 27
2009-02-08 82 45 36
2009-02-04 66 51 39
2009-01-20 38 35 27
2009-01-11 13 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
Subject : iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12808
Subject : Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-24 19:08 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123550257312112&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
Subject : i915 broken STR
Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12805
Subject : QinQ vlan trunking regression
Submitter : Bart Trojanowski <bart-LIbhotJ4rFdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-28 18:05 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123584439115868&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12804
Subject : some tc commands fail
Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-03-02 0:36 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123595420013357&w=4
Handled-By : Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12800
Subject : x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions
Submitter : Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-03-02 01:40 (2 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12792
Subject : 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure
Submitter : Sachin P. Sant <sachinp-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-27 23:19 (5 days old)
References : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-February/068771.html
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12778
Subject : regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6
Submitter : yury <urykhy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-25 09:25 (7 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
Subject : Oops in i915_gem_flush
Submitter : Kalev Lember <kalev-KfhB8dnw0QSuvFJfX82//w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-24 08:35 (8 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769
Subject : 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)
Submitter : Michael <auslands-kv-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-23 23:36 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Subject : i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-21 15:38 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123523074304955&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
Subject : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763
Subject : Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1
Submitter : Matthew A. Bockol <mbockol-dmoCqaWXHRX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-21 5:42 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Subject : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd-HjJ2MNWy62to6+H+lsi3Gti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject : X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681
Subject : s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)
Submitter : Orivej Desh <smpuj-5URONGGNgjI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-09 13:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cfe62c8010ac56e1bd3827e30386a87cc2f3594
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
Subject : Entropy pool problem
Submitter : Valentin QUEQUET <v.quequet-techniques-1tsiiZ//OF9QFI55V6+gNQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-09 09:12 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12670
Subject : BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21
Submitter : Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-08 11:04 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123409113223833&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12668
Subject : USB flash disk surprise disconnect
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-08 10:21 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123408851821292&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
Subject : Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-13 18:34 (50 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123187185426236&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Subject : new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter : Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-12 15:46 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12490
Subject : ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter : Sergey S. Kostyliov <rathamahata-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-12 7:38 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123174591509586&w=4
Handled-By : Bob Copeland <me-aXfl/3sk2vNUbtYUoyoikg@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444
Subject : X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
Submitter : Graham Murray <graham-0mDQKtL6jrwDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-13 14:03 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Subject : possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
Submitter : Wang Chen <wangchen-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-08 14:11 (55 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=546b0974c39657017407c86fe79811100b60700d
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Subject : Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
Submitter : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-07 22:43 (56 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (58 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12811
Subject : undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc
Submitter : Rogério Brito <rbrito-qczF+2RCDl1fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-03-02 9:43 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123598702511826&w=4
Handled-By : Rogério Brito <rbrito-qczF+2RCDl1fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123606933628020&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
Subject : Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
Subject : Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Submitter : J.A. Magallón <jamagallon-sh/6fXdz2Rs@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-17 8:52 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123486078219980&w=4
Handled-By : Brian Haley <brian.haley-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123517631120945&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12671
Subject : uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-08 14:58 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123410529909318&w=4
Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/15/172
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12667
Subject : Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
Submitter : Paul Collins <paul-dsjeNyW6Qm/D+ROgJ3VA+kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-21 7:15 (42 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1c5745aa380efb6417b5681104b007c8612fb496
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123252215315106&w=4
Handled-By : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/16/78
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.28,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12398
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
@ 2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.28, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.28, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-03-03 108 33 28
2009-02-24 95 32 24
2009-02-14 85 33 27
2009-02-08 82 45 36
2009-02-04 66 51 39
2009-01-20 38 35 27
2009-01-11 13 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
Subject : iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date : 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12808
Subject : Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-02-24 19:08 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123550257312112&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
Subject : i915 broken STR
Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12805
Subject : QinQ vlan trunking regression
Submitter : Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>
Date : 2009-02-28 18:05 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123584439115868&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12804
Subject : some tc commands fail
Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-03-02 0:36 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123595420013357&w=4
Handled-By : Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12800
Subject : x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions
Submitter : Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Date : 2009-03-02 01:40 (2 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12792
Subject : 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure
Submitter : Sachin P. Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-02-27 23:19 (5 days old)
References : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-February/068771.html
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12778
Subject : regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6
Submitter : yury <urykhy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-25 09:25 (7 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
Subject : Oops in i915_gem_flush
Submitter : Kalev Lember <kalev@colleduc.ee>
Date : 2009-02-24 08:35 (8 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769
Subject : 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)
Submitter : Michael <auslands-kv@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-02-23 23:36 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Subject : i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Date : 2009-02-21 15:38 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123523074304955&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
Subject : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763
Subject : Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1
Submitter : Matthew A. Bockol <mbockol@carleton.edu>
Date : 2009-02-21 5:42 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Subject : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Date : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject : X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date : 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681
Subject : s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)
Submitter : Orivej Desh <smpuj@bk.ru>
Date : 2009-02-09 13:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cfe62c8010ac56e1bd3827e30386a87cc2f3594
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
Subject : Entropy pool problem
Submitter : Valentin QUEQUET <v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr>
Date : 2009-02-09 09:12 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12670
Subject : BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21
Submitter : Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-08 11:04 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123409113223833&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12668
Subject : USB flash disk surprise disconnect
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-08 10:21 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123408851821292&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
Subject : Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-13 18:34 (50 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123187185426236&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Subject : new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter : Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date : 2009-01-12 15:46 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12490
Subject : ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter : Sergey S. Kostyliov <rathamahata@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-12 7:38 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123174591509586&w=4
Handled-By : Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444
Subject : X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
Submitter : Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk>
Date : 2009-01-13 14:03 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Subject : possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
Submitter : Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date : 2009-01-08 14:11 (55 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=546b0974c39657017407c86fe79811100b60700d
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Subject : Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
Submitter : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date : 2009-01-07 22:43 (56 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (58 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12811
Subject : undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc
Submitter : Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Date : 2009-03-02 9:43 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123598702511826&w=4
Handled-By : Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123606933628020&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
Subject : Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Date : 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
Subject : Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Submitter : J.A. Magallón <jamagallon@ono.com>
Date : 2009-02-17 8:52 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123486078219980&w=4
Handled-By : Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123517631120945&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12671
Subject : uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date : 2009-02-08 14:58 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123410529909318&w=4
Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/15/172
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12667
Subject : Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
Submitter : Paul Collins <paul@burly.ondioline.org>
Date : 2009-01-21 7:15 (42 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1c5745aa380efb6417b5681104b007c8612fb496
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123252215315106&w=4
Handled-By : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/16/78
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.28,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12398
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jeff Chua, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (58 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
@ 2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jeff Chua, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12414
Subject : iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29?
Submitter : Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-05 4:13 (58 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123112882127823&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12418] Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Subject : Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
Submitter : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date : 2009-01-07 22:43 (56 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12419] possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Wang Chen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Subject : possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
Submitter : Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date : 2009-01-08 14:11 (55 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=546b0974c39657017407c86fe79811100b60700d
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12444] X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Graham Murray
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444
Subject : X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
Submitter : Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk>
Date : 2009-01-13 14:03 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12490] ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland, Sergey S. Kostyliov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12490
Subject : ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter : Sergey S. Kostyliov <rathamahata@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-12 7:38 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123174591509586&w=4
Handled-By : Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12497] new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christoph Hellwig, Jens Axboe, Tejun Heo
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Subject : new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter : Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date : 2009-01-12 15:46 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12499] Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
Subject : Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-13 18:34 (50 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123187185426236&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12419] possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Wang Chen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Subject : possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma
Submitter : Wang Chen <wangchen-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-08 14:11 (55 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=546b0974c39657017407c86fe79811100b60700d
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12444] X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Graham Murray
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444
Subject : X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
Submitter : Graham Murray <graham-0mDQKtL6jrwDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-13 14:03 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12497] new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christoph Hellwig, Jens Axboe, Tejun Heo
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Subject : new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter : Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-12 15:46 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12490] ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland, Sergey S. Kostyliov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12490
Subject : ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
Submitter : Sergey S. Kostyliov <rathamahata-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-12 7:38 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123174591509586&w=4
Handled-By : Bob Copeland <me-aXfl/3sk2vNUbtYUoyoikg@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12418] Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Subject : Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears
Submitter : Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-07 22:43 (56 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123136836213319&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12499] Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
Subject : Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-13 18:34 (50 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123187185426236&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Matthew Garrett
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Ingo Molnar,
Paul Collins, Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12667
Subject : Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
Submitter : Paul Collins <paul@burly.ondioline.org>
Date : 2009-01-21 7:15 (42 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1c5745aa380efb6417b5681104b007c8612fb496
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123252215315106&w=4
Handled-By : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/16/78
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12668] USB flash disk surprise disconnect
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Vegard Nossum
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12668
Subject : USB flash disk surprise disconnect
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-08 10:21 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123408851821292&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12668] USB flash disk surprise disconnect
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Vegard Nossum
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12668
Subject : USB flash disk surprise disconnect
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-08 10:21 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123408851821292&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Ingo Molnar,
Paul Collins, Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12667
Subject : Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
Submitter : Paul Collins <paul-dsjeNyW6Qm/D+ROgJ3VA+kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-21 7:15 (42 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1c5745aa380efb6417b5681104b007c8612fb496
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123252215315106&w=4
Handled-By : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/16/78
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Matthew Garrett
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12670] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alessandro Bono
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12670
Subject : BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21
Submitter : Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-08 11:04 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123409113223833&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12680] Entropy pool problem
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Valentin QUEQUET
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
Subject : Entropy pool problem
Submitter : Valentin QUEQUET <v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr>
Date : 2009-02-09 09:12 (23 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12671] uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Randy Dunlap
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12671
Subject : uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date : 2009-02-08 14:58 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123410529909318&w=4
Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/15/172
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12681] s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Starikovskiy, Len Brown, Orivej Desh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681
Subject : s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)
Submitter : Orivej Desh <smpuj@bk.ru>
Date : 2009-02-09 13:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cfe62c8010ac56e1bd3827e30386a87cc2f3594
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12681] s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Starikovskiy, Len Brown, Orivej Desh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681
Subject : s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled)
Submitter : Orivej Desh <smpuj-5URONGGNgjI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-09 13:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cfe62c8010ac56e1bd3827e30386a87cc2f3594
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12670] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alessandro Bono
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12670
Subject : BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21
Submitter : Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-08 11:04 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123409113223833&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12680] Entropy pool problem
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Valentin QUEQUET
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
Subject : Entropy pool problem
Submitter : Valentin QUEQUET <v.quequet-techniques-1tsiiZ//OF9QFI55V6+gNQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-09 09:12 (23 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12671] uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Randy Dunlap
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12671
Subject : uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device'
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-08 14:58 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123410529909318&w=4
Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/15/172
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Len Brown,
Matthew Garrett, Nico Schottelius
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject : X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
Date : 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12758] ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Heinz Diehl
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Subject : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Date : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12761] Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrey Borzenkov, Brian Haley,
J.A. Magallón, Jay Vosburgh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
Subject : Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Submitter : J.A. Magallón <jamagallon@ono.com>
Date : 2009-02-17 8:52 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123486078219980&w=4
Handled-By : Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123517631120945&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Len Brown,
Matthew Garrett, Nico Schottelius
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
Subject : X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12758] ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Heinz Diehl
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Subject : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd-HjJ2MNWy62to6+H+lsi3Gti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12761] Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrey Borzenkov, Brian Haley,
J.A. Magallón, Jay Vosburgh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
Subject : Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Submitter : J.A. Magallón <jamagallon-sh/6fXdz2Rs@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-17 8:52 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123486078219980&w=4
Handled-By : Brian Haley <brian.haley-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123517631120945&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12763] Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matthew A. Bockol
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763
Subject : Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1
Submitter : Matthew A. Bockol <mbockol@carleton.edu>
Date : 2009-02-21 5:42 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, James Bottomley,
James Bottomley, Sitsofe Wheeler
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
Subject : Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Date : 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12764] Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes,
Maciej Rutecki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
Subject : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12763] Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matthew A. Bockol
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763
Subject : Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1
Submitter : Matthew A. Bockol <mbockol-dmoCqaWXHRX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-21 5:42 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, James Bottomley,
James Bottomley, Sitsofe Wheeler
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
Subject : Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12764] Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes,
Maciej Rutecki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
Subject : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12765] i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Sitsofe Wheeler
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Subject : i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Date : 2009-02-21 15:38 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123523074304955&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12769] 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769
Subject : 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)
Submitter : Michael <auslands-kv@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-02-23 23:36 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12778] regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, yury
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12778
Subject : regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6
Submitter : yury <urykhy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-25 09:25 (7 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12792] 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Sachin P. Sant
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12792
Subject : 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure
Submitter : Sachin P. Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-02-27 23:19 (5 days old)
References : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-February/068771.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12771] Oops in i915_gem_flush
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Kalev Lember
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
Subject : Oops in i915_gem_flush
Submitter : Kalev Lember <kalev@colleduc.ee>
Date : 2009-02-24 08:35 (8 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12771] Oops in i915_gem_flush
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Kalev Lember
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
Subject : Oops in i915_gem_flush
Submitter : Kalev Lember <kalev-KfhB8dnw0QSuvFJfX82//w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-24 08:35 (8 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12769] 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769
Subject : 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video)
Submitter : Michael <auslands-kv-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-23 23:36 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12778] regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, yury
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12778
Subject : regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6
Submitter : yury <urykhy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-25 09:25 (7 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12765] i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Sitsofe Wheeler
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Subject : i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-21 15:38 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123523074304955&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12792] 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Sachin P. Sant
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12792
Subject : 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure
Submitter : Sachin P. Sant <sachinp-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-27 23:19 (5 days old)
References : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-February/068771.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12800] x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Thomas Hellstrom
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12800
Subject : x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions
Submitter : Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Date : 2009-03-02 01:40 (2 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12804] some tc commands fail
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jarek Poplawski, Joao Correia
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12804
Subject : some tc commands fail
Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-03-02 0:36 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123595420013357&w=4
Handled-By : Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12805] QinQ vlan trunking regression
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bart Trojanowski
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12805
Subject : QinQ vlan trunking regression
Submitter : Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>
Date : 2009-02-28 18:05 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123584439115868&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Harvey Harrison,
Jesse Barnes
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
Subject : i915 broken STR
Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12805] QinQ vlan trunking regression
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bart Trojanowski
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12805
Subject : QinQ vlan trunking regression
Submitter : Bart Trojanowski <bart-LIbhotJ4rFdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-28 18:05 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123584439115868&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12804] some tc commands fail
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jarek Poplawski, Joao Correia
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12804
Subject : some tc commands fail
Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-03-02 0:36 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123595420013357&w=4
Handled-By : Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12800] x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Thomas Hellstrom
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12800
Subject : x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions
Submitter : Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-03-02 01:40 (2 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Harvey Harrison,
Jesse Barnes
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
Subject : i915 broken STR
Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12811] undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rogério Brito
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12811
Subject : undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc
Submitter : Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Date : 2009-03-02 9:43 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123598702511826&w=4
Handled-By : Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123606933628020&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Lin Ming, Linus Torvalds,
Nick Piggin, Peter Zijlstra, Wu Fengguang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
Subject : iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date : 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12808] Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki, Tino Keitel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12808
Subject : Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-02-24 19:08 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123550257312112&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Lin Ming, Linus Torvalds,
Nick Piggin, Peter Zijlstra, Wu Fengguang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
Subject : iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12808] Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki, Tino Keitel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12808
Subject : Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-24 19:08 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123550257312112&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12811] undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc
@ 2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rogério Brito
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12811
Subject : undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc
Submitter : Rogério Brito <rbrito-qczF+2RCDl1fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-03-02 9:43 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123598702511826&w=4
Handled-By : Rogério Brito <rbrito-qczF+2RCDl1fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123606933628020&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 22:07 ` James Bottomley
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2009-03-03 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern,
Sitsofe Wheeler
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
> Subject : Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
> Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
> Date : 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
> Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4
In theory, the fix should be upstream here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00
(not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
@ 2009-03-03 22:07 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2009-03-03 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern,
Sitsofe Wheeler
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
> Subject : Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
> Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
> Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4
In theory, the fix should be upstream here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00
(not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
@ 2009-03-03 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern,
Sitsofe Wheeler
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
> > Subject : Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
> > Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
> > Date : 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
> > Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4
>
> In theory, the fix should be upstream here:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00
>
> (not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
@ 2009-03-03 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern,
Sitsofe Wheeler
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
> > Subject : Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
> > Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-02-19 13:53 (13 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b60af5b0adf0da24c673598c8d3fb4d4189a15ce
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123505185407604&w=4
> > Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123508030726900&w=4
>
> In theory, the fix should be upstream here:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00
>
> (not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 22:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-03-03 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
>
>
>
I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-03-03 22:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-03-03 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
>
>
>
I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-03-03 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> > Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> > Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
> >
> >
> >
>
> I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.
OK, I'm going to close it, then.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-03-03 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> > Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> > Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
> >
> >
> >
>
> I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.
OK, I'm going to close it, then.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-03-04 1:03 ` Zhang Rui
2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
` (3 more replies)
-1 siblings, 4 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Rui @ 2009-03-04 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
>
the problem has already been fixed by
3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048
thanks,
rui
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-03-04 1:03 ` Zhang Rui
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Rui @ 2009-03-04 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds,
Linux PM List
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
>
the problem has already been fixed by
3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048
thanks,
rui
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-04 1:03 ` 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Zhang Rui
@ 2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-04 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Rui
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
* Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> >
> the problem has already been fixed by
> 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048
yes - please consider it fixed.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
@ 2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-04 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Rui
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
* Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> >
> the problem has already been fixed by
> 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048
yes - please consider it fixed.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-04 1:03 ` 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Zhang Rui
2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-07 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-07 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
3 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-04 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Rui
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds,
Linux PM List
* Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> >
> the problem has already been fixed by
> 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048
yes - please consider it fixed.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-03-04 1:15 ` Zhang Rui
2009-03-07 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 159+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Rui @ 2009-03-04 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Linux ACPI, eric, airlied
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> Subject : X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
> Date : 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
>
e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799 is first bad commit
commit e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
Author: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Date: Thu Jan 22 09:56:58 2009 -0800
drm/i915: Suppress GEM teardown on X Server exit in KMS mode.
Fixes hangs when starting X for the second time.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
thanks,
rui
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-04 1:21 ` Zhang Rui
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Rui @ 2009-03-04 1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Linux ACPI
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
> Subject : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
> Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd-HjJ2MNWy62to6+H+lsi3Gti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
>
Handled by: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch-available:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view
not sure if this patch is in len's tree or not.
thanks,
rui
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
@ 2009-03-04 1:21 ` Zhang Rui
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Rui @ 2009-03-04 1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Linux ACPI
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
> Subject : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
> Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
> Date : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
>
Handled by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Patch-available:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view
not sure if this patch is in len's tree or not.
thanks,
rui
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-04 6:43 ` Nico Schottelius
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Nico Schottelius @ 2009-03-04 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie,
Eric Anholt, Len Brown, Matthew Garrett, Nico Schottelius
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 652 bytes --]
Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.
Nico
--
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/
PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42 F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
@ 2009-03-04 6:43 ` Nico Schottelius
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Nico Schottelius @ 2009-03-04 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie,
Eric Anholt, Len Brown, Matthew Garrett, Nico Schottelius
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 652 bytes --]
Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.
Nico
--
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/
PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42 F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-04 9:02 ` Pekka Enberg
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-03-04 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Matthew Garrett, rui.zhang
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
@ 2009-03-04 9:02 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-03-04 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Matthew Garrett, rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-04 16:47 ` Harvey Harrison
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2009-03-04 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie,
Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> Subject : i915 broken STR
> Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
>
Still present in -rc7, let me know what info you need to help debug.
Harvey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
@ 2009-03-04 16:47 ` Harvey Harrison
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2009-03-04 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie,
Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> Subject : i915 broken STR
> Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
>
Still present in -rc7, let me know what info you need to help debug.
Harvey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-04 19:14 ` Maciej Rutecki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Rutecki @ 2009-03-04 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> Subject : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7
--
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.maciek.unixy.pl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
@ 2009-03-04 19:14 ` Maciej Rutecki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Rutecki @ 2009-03-04 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> Subject : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7
--
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.maciek.unixy.pl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (37 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-03-04 19:14 ` Maciej Rutecki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Rutecki @ 2009-03-04 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds,
Linux PM List
2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> Subject : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7
--
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.maciek.unixy.pl
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-03-04 23:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-03-04 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:42:36PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> > > Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> > > Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
> > > Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.
>
> OK, I'm going to close it, then.
Spoke too soon.
I see this again on 2.6.29-rc7.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-03-04 23:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-03-04 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:42:36PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> > > Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> > > Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (34 days old)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I don't seem to observe this warning in v2.6.29-rc6 anymore.
>
> OK, I'm going to close it, then.
Spoke too soon.
I see this again on 2.6.29-rc7.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-05 1:09 ` Wu Fengguang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Wu Fengguang @ 2009-03-05 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton,
Lin, Ming M, Linus Torvalds, Nick Piggin, Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
> Subject : iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
> Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> Date : 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
> Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Following Peter's idea of relaxing writeback throttling, Lin Ming
and I tried the idea of totally disabling writeback throttling by
doing benchmarks with the following parameters:
echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
echo 50 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
The result is encouraging: the iozone performance is restored to the
level of 2.6.29-rc5!
We'll continue to evaluate the dirty/throttling numbers with Nick's patch.
Thanks,
Fengguang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
@ 2009-03-05 1:09 ` Wu Fengguang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Wu Fengguang @ 2009-03-05 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton,
Lin, Ming M, Linus Torvalds, Nick Piggin, Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
> Subject : iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
> Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
> Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Following Peter's idea of relaxing writeback throttling, Lin Ming
and I tried the idea of totally disabling writeback throttling by
doing benchmarks with the following parameters:
echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
echo 50 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
The result is encouraging: the iozone performance is restored to the
level of 2.6.29-rc5!
We'll continue to evaluate the dirty/throttling numbers with Nick's patch.
Thanks,
Fengguang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
[not found] ` <1236219189.2567.123.camel@ymzhang>
@ 2009-03-05 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2009-03-05 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang, Yanmin; +Cc: Wu Fengguang, Lin, Ming M, Nick Piggin, Andrew Morton, lkml
(list restored)
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 10:13 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> My idea:
> 1) When the main thread traps into kernel and find need to write back pages; it just starts
> write back, but it needn't change timestamp (???or something like that) on writeback; and start
> pdflush;
> 2) Later on pdflush could pick up the file to write back for other pages on the same file;
> 3) The target is to let pdflush to writeback pages and main testing thread continues on its own
> work, so we can benefit from SMP.
No!
This is not about parallelism, this is about making sure there is a
limited number of dirty pages, that means the tasks generating dirty
pages will _have_ to wait. You simply cannot delegate that.
Furthermore, the task throttling explicitly wants to throttle the task
that generates all those dirty pages more than other tasks. So pushing
the throttle out to pdflush will destroy the whole scheme.
The reason we want to make the heavy dirtier throttle sooner is that
other tasks, who only occasionally dirty a page, don't get caught in the
massive throttle latency.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
@ 2009-03-05 12:50 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Sitsofe Wheeler @ 2009-03-05 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:07:29PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> In theory, the fix should be upstream here:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00
>
> (not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).
Yup - just tested -rc7 and the problem is gone. Thanks!
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
@ 2009-03-05 12:50 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Sitsofe Wheeler @ 2009-03-05 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:07:29PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> In theory, the fix should be upstream here:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=126c098296c8f96cf7f6ca0fdb47265ac7994f00
>
> (not in a released -rc yet, but should be in -rc7).
Yup - just tested -rc7 and the problem is gone. Thanks!
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-07 5:53 ` Harvey Harrison
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2009-03-07 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie,
Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> Subject : i915 broken STR
> Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
>
>
This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
Harvey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
@ 2009-03-07 5:53 ` Harvey Harrison
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2009-03-07 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie,
Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> Subject : i915 broken STR
> Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
>
>
This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
Harvey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
2009-03-07 5:53 ` Harvey Harrison
@ 2009-03-07 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harvey Harrison
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie,
Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes
On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > Subject : i915 broken STR
> > Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> >
> >
>
> This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
on the Harvey's hardware?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
@ 2009-03-07 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harvey Harrison
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie,
Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes
On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > Subject : i915 broken STR
> > Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> >
> >
>
> This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
on the Harvey's hardware?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
@ 2009-03-07 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Matthew Garrett, rui.zhang
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
>
> There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
@ 2009-03-07 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Matthew Garrett, rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
>
> There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
@ 2009-03-07 21:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nico Schottelius
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie,
Eric Anholt, Len Brown, Matthew Garrett
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
> there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.
Well, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
@ 2009-03-07 21:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nico Schottelius
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie,
Eric Anholt, Len Brown, Matthew Garrett
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
> there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.
Well, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
2009-03-05 1:09 ` Wu Fengguang
@ 2009-03-07 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu Fengguang
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton,
Lin, Ming M, Linus Torvalds, Nick Piggin, Peter Zijlstra
On Thursday 05 March 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
> > Subject : iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
> > Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> > Date : 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
> > Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> Following Peter's idea of relaxing writeback throttling, Lin Ming
> and I tried the idea of totally disabling writeback throttling by
> doing benchmarks with the following parameters:
>
> echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
> echo 50 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
>
> The result is encouraging: the iozone performance is restored to the
> level of 2.6.29-rc5!
>
> We'll continue to evaluate the dirty/throttling numbers with Nick's patch.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
@ 2009-03-07 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu Fengguang
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton,
Lin, Ming M, Linus Torvalds, Nick Piggin, Peter Zijlstra
On Thursday 05 March 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
> > Subject : iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6
> > Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4
> > Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Following Peter's idea of relaxing writeback throttling, Lin Ming
> and I tried the idea of totally disabling writeback throttling by
> doing benchmarks with the following parameters:
>
> echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
> echo 50 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
>
> The result is encouraging: the iozone performance is restored to the
> level of 2.6.29-rc5!
>
> We'll continue to evaluate the dirty/throttling numbers with Nick's patch.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-04 1:03 ` 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Zhang Rui
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-07 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-07 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
3 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Rui
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> >
> the problem has already been fixed by
> 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-04 1:03 ` 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Zhang Rui
2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-03-07 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-07 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
3 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Rui
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds,
Linux PM List
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> >
> the problem has already been fixed by
> 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-04 1:15 ` Zhang Rui
@ 2009-03-07 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Rui
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Linux ACPI, eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg, airlied-cv59FeDIM0c
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> > Subject : X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> > Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> > Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> >
>
> e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799 is first bad commit
> commit e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
> Author: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Thu Jan 22 09:56:58 2009 -0800
>
> drm/i915: Suppress GEM teardown on X Server exit in KMS mode.
>
> Fixes hangs when starting X for the second time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied-cv59FeDIM0c@public.gmane.org>
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
@ 2009-03-07 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Rui
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Linux ACPI, eric, airlied
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
> > Subject : X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
> > Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
> > Date : 2009-02-13 9:33 (19 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123451768406825&w=4
> > Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> >
>
> e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799 is first bad commit
> commit e806b4957412bf472d826bd8cc571da041248799
> Author: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
> Date: Thu Jan 22 09:56:58 2009 -0800
>
> drm/i915: Suppress GEM teardown on X Server exit in KMS mode.
>
> Fixes hangs when starting X for the second time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123479975503827&w=2
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-04 1:21 ` Zhang Rui
(?)
@ 2009-03-07 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200903072312.30158.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Rui
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Linux ACPI
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
> > Subject : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
> > Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
> > Date : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
> >
> Handled by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Patch-available:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view
>
> not sure if this patch is in len's tree or not.
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-04 19:14 ` Maciej Rutecki
@ 2009-03-07 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej Rutecki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> 2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>:
>
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> > Subject : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> > Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
>
> Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
@ 2009-03-07 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej Rutecki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> 2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
>
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> > Subject : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> > Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
>
> Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-04 19:14 ` Maciej Rutecki
(?)
@ 2009-03-07 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej Rutecki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds,
Linux PM List
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> 2009/3/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
>
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12764
> > Subject : Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page
> > Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-02-23 14:46 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6fb88588555a18792a27f483887fe1f2af5f9c9b
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540053219505&w=4
>
> Problem seems by solved in 2.6.29-rc7
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12444] X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-03-07 22:27 ` Graham Murray
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Graham Murray @ 2009-03-07 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12444
> Subject : X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected
> Submitter : Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk>
> Date : 2009-01-13 14:03 (50 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c1c2871a6a3a114853ec6836e9035ac1c0c7f7a
I am still seeing the same symptoms in 2.6.29-rc7-0003-g559595a.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
@ 2009-03-08 3:58 ` Johannes Weiner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Weiner @ 2009-03-08 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Ingo Molnar, Matthew Garrett, rui.zhang
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > > Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > > Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> >
> > There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view
>
> Thanks, updated.
This fix is upstream: 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
@ 2009-03-08 3:58 ` Johannes Weiner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Weiner @ 2009-03-08 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Ingo Molnar, Matthew Garrett, rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12501
> > > Subject : build bug in eeepc-laptop.c
> > > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2009-01-14 17:25 (49 days old)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/315
> >
> > There's seems to be a patch for the bug here:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20341&action=view
>
> Thanks, updated.
This fix is upstream: 3a5093ee6728c8cbe9c039e685fc1fca8f965048
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
2009-03-07 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-03-10 2:23 ` Eric Anholt
2009-03-10 2:33 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-03-10 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 2 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Eric Anholt @ 2009-03-10 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Harvey Harrison, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dave Airlie, Jesse Barnes
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1553 bytes --]
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > Subject : i915 broken STR
> > > Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> > > Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > >
> > >
> >
> > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
>
> Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
>
> Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> on the Harvey's hardware?
There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
started. If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
--
Eric Anholt
eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
2009-03-10 2:23 ` Eric Anholt
@ 2009-03-10 2:33 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-03-10 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2009-03-10 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jesse Barnes
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 19:23 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > On > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> >
> > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> >
> > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > on the Harvey's hardware?
>
> There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> started. If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
>
Yep, turns out I had KMS turned on in my config...I thought I'd disabled
it, sorry for the noise.
Harvey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
@ 2009-03-10 2:33 ` Harvey Harrison
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2009-03-10 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jesse Barnes
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 19:23 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > On > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> >
> > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> >
> > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > on the Harvey's hardware?
>
> There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> started. If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
>
Yep, turns out I had KMS turned on in my config...I thought I'd disabled
it, sorry for the noise.
Harvey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
2009-03-10 2:23 ` Eric Anholt
@ 2009-03-10 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-10 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-10 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt
Cc: Harvey Harrison, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dave Airlie, Jesse Barnes
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > Subject : i915 broken STR
> > > > Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> > > > Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> >
> > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> >
> > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > on the Harvey's hardware?
>
> There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> started. If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
driver?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
@ 2009-03-10 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-10 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt
Cc: Harvey Harrison, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dave Airlie, Jesse Barnes
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > Subject : i915 broken STR
> > > > Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > > Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> >
> > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> >
> > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > on the Harvey's hardware?
>
> There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> started. If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
driver?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
@ 2009-03-10 17:32 ` Eric Anholt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Eric Anholt @ 2009-03-10 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Harvey Harrison, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dave Airlie, Jesse Barnes
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2456 bytes --]
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > >
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > > Subject : i915 broken STR
> > > > > Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> > > > > Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > >
> > > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > >
> > > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > > on the Harvey's hardware?
> >
> > There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> > guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> > started. If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
>
> BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
> driver?
I pulled a giant pile of KMS bugfixes into 2.6.2, so I'm not sure about
2.6.1.
We've still got some work to do with making our suspend/resume path
really complete for KMS. We're missing some register setup that UMS
does, so behavior can be a bit random. The current plan is to switch to
using the KMS modeset paths for resume, so we hopefully have reliable
(or at least consistent) mode setting behavior, and then fill those
remaining register writes in around it. Basically, a separate
suspend/resume path for KMS, when we have full control of the device.
--
Eric Anholt
eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
@ 2009-03-10 17:32 ` Eric Anholt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Eric Anholt @ 2009-03-10 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Harvey Harrison, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dave Airlie, Jesse Barnes
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2545 bytes --]
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > >
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > > Subject : i915 broken STR
> > > > > Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > >
> > > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > >
> > > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > > on the Harvey's hardware?
> >
> > There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> > guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> > started. If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
>
> BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
> driver?
I pulled a giant pile of KMS bugfixes into 2.6.2, so I'm not sure about
2.6.1.
We've still got some work to do with making our suspend/resume path
really complete for KMS. We're missing some register setup that UMS
does, so behavior can be a bit random. The current plan is to switch to
using the KMS modeset paths for resume, so we hopefully have reliable
(or at least consistent) mode setting behavior, and then fill those
remaining register writes in around it. Basically, a separate
suspend/resume path for KMS, when we have full control of the device.
--
Eric Anholt
eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org eric.anholt-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
2009-03-10 17:32 ` Eric Anholt
@ 2009-03-10 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-10 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt
Cc: Harvey Harrison, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dave Airlie, Jesse Barnes
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > > (either way).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > > > Subject : i915 broken STR
> > > > > > Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > > >
> > > > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > > >
> > > > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > > > on the Harvey's hardware?
> > >
> > > There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> > > guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> > > started. If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
> >
> > BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
> > driver?
>
> I pulled a giant pile of KMS bugfixes into 2.6.2, so I'm not sure about
> 2.6.1.
>
> We've still got some work to do with making our suspend/resume path
> really complete for KMS. We're missing some register setup that UMS
> does, so behavior can be a bit random. The current plan is to switch to
> using the KMS modeset paths for resume, so we hopefully have reliable
> (or at least consistent) mode setting behavior, and then fill those
> remaining register writes in around it. Basically, a separate
> suspend/resume path for KMS, when we have full control of the device.
OK, thanks.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR
@ 2009-03-10 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-10 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt
Cc: Harvey Harrison, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dave Airlie, Jesse Barnes
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 07 March 2009, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > > (either way).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
> > > > > > Subject : i915 broken STR
> > > > > > Submitter : Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > > Date : 2009-02-28 4:20 (4 days old)
> > > > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5669fcacc58bf3a7386057addffd280d75380858
> > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123579487801064&w=4
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This looks to have been a case of old-userspace..upgrading to
> > > > > xorg-intel-video 2.6.1 (ubuntu Jaunty Alpha5) fixes STR here.
> > > >
> > > > Well, thanks, but I'm not really sure if this is a good news.
> > > >
> > > > Jesse, Eric, does it mean we now break resume on anything earlier than 2.6.1
> > > > on the Harvey's hardware?
> > >
> > > There's not much information (dmesg, Xorg.0.log) with this bug -- I'm
> > > guessing he's using KMS, given that that commit was where the problems
> > > started. If so, yes, you really do need good userland for KMS to work.
> >
> > BTW, Is suspend generally supposed to work with KMS and the 2.6.1 (or later) X
> > driver?
>
> I pulled a giant pile of KMS bugfixes into 2.6.2, so I'm not sure about
> 2.6.1.
>
> We've still got some work to do with making our suspend/resume path
> really complete for KMS. We're missing some register setup that UMS
> does, so behavior can be a bit random. The current plan is to switch to
> using the KMS modeset paths for resume, so we hopefully have reliable
> (or at least consistent) mode setting behavior, and then fill those
> remaining register writes in around it. Basically, a separate
> suspend/resume path for KMS, when we have full control of the device.
OK, thanks.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
@ 2009-04-04 4:25 ` Len Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2009-04-04 4:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Nico Schottelius, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Matthew Garrett
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> >
> > Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
> > there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.
>
> Well, thanks for the update.
It is a DRI bug, assigned to
Eric Anholt -- I'm not handling it.
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
@ 2009-04-04 4:25 ` Len Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2009-04-04 4:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Nico Schottelius, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Matthew Garrett
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:25:55PM +0100]:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> >
> > Well, well... nobody really cares about this bug, so it's still
> > there. Seems this automatic reminder will be persistent until 2.6.30.
>
> Well, thanks for the update.
It is a DRI bug, assigned to
Eric Anholt -- I'm not handling it.
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
2009-03-07 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-04-04 7:40 ` Len Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2009-04-04 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Zhang Rui, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Linux ACPI
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
> > > Subject : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
> > > Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd-HjJ2MNWy62to6+H+lsi3Gti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
> > >
> > Handled by: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch-available:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view
> >
> > not sure if this patch is in len's tree or not.
>
> Thanks, updated.
per the bug report, this shipped in 2.6.29-rc8:
commit 7b46ecd5fcebf381a7bde966db352d8fb1b8e944
Author: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed Feb 25 18:00:18 2009 -0500
Revert "ACPI: make some IO ports off-limits to AML"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
@ 2009-04-04 7:40 ` Len Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2009-04-04 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Zhang Rui, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Linux ACPI
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:22 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
> > > Subject : ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
> > > Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
> > > Date : 2009-02-23 16:46 (9 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123540758700861&w=4
> > >
> > Handled by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> > Patch-available:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view
> >
> > not sure if this patch is in len's tree or not.
>
> Thanks, updated.
per the bug report, this shipped in 2.6.29-rc8:
commit 7b46ecd5fcebf381a7bde966db352d8fb1b8e944
Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date: Wed Feb 25 18:00:18 2009 -0500
Revert "ACPI: make some IO ports off-limits to AML"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-04-06 18:54 2.6.29-git13: " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-04-06 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-04-06 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (68 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-04-06 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-04-06 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (68 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-03-21 16:28 2.6.29-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-21 16:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-21 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (52 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-03-21 16:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-21 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (52 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-03-16 0:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
(?)
@ 2009-03-19 13:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-19 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 16 March 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> > Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> > Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (45 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
> >
>
> It's still there in rc8.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-03-14 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-16 0:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-03-16 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (45 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
>
It's still there in rc8.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-03-16 0:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-03-16 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (45 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
>
It's still there in rc8.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-03-14 19:01 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-14 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-14 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (45 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-03-14 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-14 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (45 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-02-23 21:45 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 21:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (26 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-02-23 21:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (26 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-02-14 20:35 2.6.29-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-14 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-14 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (17 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-02-14 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-14 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (17 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/9/205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-02-10 22:41 ` Eric Anholt
@ 2009-02-11 7:10 ` Thomas Hellström
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Hellström @ 2009-02-11 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, Dave Airlie, Rafael J. Wysocki, dri-devel,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 00:37 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>> Dave, dri guys,
>> Could you take a look at this circular dependency please (below)? I
>> observe it when suspending laptop with radeon drm loaded and with
>> lockdep enabled. It seems that the root of the problem is that
>> various vm ops such as drm_vm_open, drm_mmap) are called with mm
>> semaphore taken, and take dev->struct_mutex. On the other hand,
>> drm_rmmap_locked is called with dev->struct_mutex, and calls mtrr_del
>> which depends on mm semaphore indirectly.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> Yes, there are real lock inversions now due to the GTT mmap code. It's
> going to be a pain to fix (I tried getting the mmap_sem -> struct_mutex
> path to go away, but the fact that mmap_sem is held over the fault
> handler pretty much kills that). It's high on the list, though.
>
Shouldn't it be possible to relax this given that in the fault()
handler, the mmap_sem() is taken in read mode only. This means that it
should be deadlock-safe (but still a little ugly) to take the mmap_sem()
in read mode when the struct mutex is held.
Another quick way to fix potential deadlocks, would be to take the
struct mutex in the following way in fault():
if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->struct_mutex)) {
needs_resched();
return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
}
/Thomas
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
> software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
> build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
> resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
> Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Dri-devel mailing list
> Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-02-11 7:10 ` Thomas Hellström
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Hellström @ 2009-02-11 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Michael S. Tsirkin,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, dri-devel
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 00:37 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>> Dave, dri guys,
>> Could you take a look at this circular dependency please (below)? I
>> observe it when suspending laptop with radeon drm loaded and with
>> lockdep enabled. It seems that the root of the problem is that
>> various vm ops such as drm_vm_open, drm_mmap) are called with mm
>> semaphore taken, and take dev->struct_mutex. On the other hand,
>> drm_rmmap_locked is called with dev->struct_mutex, and calls mtrr_del
>> which depends on mm semaphore indirectly.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> Yes, there are real lock inversions now due to the GTT mmap code. It's
> going to be a pain to fix (I tried getting the mmap_sem -> struct_mutex
> path to go away, but the fact that mmap_sem is held over the fault
> handler pretty much kills that). It's high on the list, though.
>
Shouldn't it be possible to relax this given that in the fault()
handler, the mmap_sem() is taken in read mode only. This means that it
should be deadlock-safe (but still a little ugly) to take the mmap_sem()
in read mode when the struct mutex is held.
Another quick way to fix potential deadlocks, would be to take the
struct mutex in the following way in fault():
if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->struct_mutex)) {
needs_resched();
return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
}
/Thomas
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
> software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
> build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
> resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
> Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Dri-devel mailing list
> Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-02-10 22:41 ` Eric Anholt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Eric Anholt @ 2009-02-10 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Dave Airlie, dri-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 936 bytes --]
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 00:37 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Dave, dri guys,
> Could you take a look at this circular dependency please (below)? I
> observe it when suspending laptop with radeon drm loaded and with
> lockdep enabled. It seems that the root of the problem is that
> various vm ops such as drm_vm_open, drm_mmap) are called with mm
> semaphore taken, and take dev->struct_mutex. On the other hand,
> drm_rmmap_locked is called with dev->struct_mutex, and calls mtrr_del
> which depends on mm semaphore indirectly.
>
> What do you think?
Yes, there are real lock inversions now due to the GTT mmap code. It's
going to be a pain to fix (I tried getting the mmap_sem -> struct_mutex
path to go away, but the fact that mmap_sem is held over the fault
handler pretty much kills that). It's high on the list, though.
--
Eric Anholt
eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-02-10 22:41 ` Eric Anholt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Eric Anholt @ 2009-02-10 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Dave Airlie, dri-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Rafael J. Wysocki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 995 bytes --]
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 00:37 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Dave, dri guys,
> Could you take a look at this circular dependency please (below)? I
> observe it when suspending laptop with radeon drm loaded and with
> lockdep enabled. It seems that the root of the problem is that
> various vm ops such as drm_vm_open, drm_mmap) are called with mm
> semaphore taken, and take dev->struct_mutex. On the other hand,
> drm_rmmap_locked is called with dev->struct_mutex, and calls mtrr_del
> which depends on mm semaphore indirectly.
>
> What do you think?
Yes, there are real lock inversions now due to the GTT mmap code. It's
going to be a pain to fix (I tried getting the mmap_sem -> struct_mutex
path to go away, but the fact that mmap_sem is held over the fault
handler pretty much kills that). It's high on the list, though.
--
Eric Anholt
eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org eric.anholt-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-02-08 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-10 22:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-02-10 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Airlie, dri-devel
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki
Dave, dri guys,
Could you take a look at this circular dependency please (below)? I
observe it when suspending laptop with radeon drm loaded and with
lockdep enabled. It seems that the root of the problem is that
various vm ops such as drm_vm_open, drm_mmap) are called with mm
semaphore taken, and take dev->struct_mutex. On the other hand,
drm_rmmap_locked is called with dev->struct_mutex, and calls mtrr_del
which depends on mm semaphore indirectly.
What do you think?
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (11 days old)
/var/log/message dump below.
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.29-rc4-mst-debug #95
-------------------------------------------------------
sleep.sh/6730 is trying to acquire lock:
(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){----}, at: [<c02c0da1>] lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x31/0x70
but task is already holding lock:
(&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}, at: [<c012d89a>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x1a/0x50
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #6 (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c0366c5d>] mutex_lock_nested+0x9d/0x2e0
[<c012d8fc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
[<c010d96f>] mtrr_del_page+0x2f/0x160
[<c010dada>] mtrr_del+0x3a/0x50
[<f851a342>] drm_rmmap_locked+0xc2/0x180 [drm]
[<f8521d31>] drm_master_destroy+0x151/0x160 [drm]
[<c022a37c>] kref_put+0x2c/0x80
[<f8521af2>] drm_master_put+0x12/0x20 [drm]
[<f851dd1b>] drm_release+0x25b/0x4a0 [drm]
[<c019781d>] __fput+0xbd/0x1d0
[<c0197c09>] fput+0x19/0x20
[<c0194a47>] filp_close+0x47/0x70
[<c0194ada>] sys_close+0x6a/0xc0
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #5 (&dev->struct_mutex){--..}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c0366c5d>] mutex_lock_nested+0x9d/0x2e0
[<f8522add>] drm_vm_open+0x2d/0x50 [drm]
[<c012a397>] dup_mm+0x227/0x310
[<c012b22f>] copy_process+0xd7f/0x1020
[<c012b5e8>] do_fork+0x78/0x320
[<c01017ef>] sys_clone+0x2f/0x40
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #4 (&mm->mmap_sem/1){--..}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c01441e8>] down_write_nested+0x48/0x70
[<c012a238>] dup_mm+0xc8/0x310
[<c012b22f>] copy_process+0xd7f/0x1020
[<c012b5e8>] do_fork+0x78/0x320
[<c01017ef>] sys_clone+0x2f/0x40
[<c0103292>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){----}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c0183d73>] might_fault+0x73/0x90
[<c022f633>] copy_to_user+0x33/0x60
[<c01a3975>] filldir64+0xb5/0xe0
[<c01e0c2f>] sysfs_readdir+0x11f/0x1f0
[<c01a3b0d>] vfs_readdir+0x8d/0xb0
[<c01a3b99>] sys_getdents64+0x69/0xc0
[<c0103292>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #2 (sysfs_mutex){--..}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c0366c5d>] mutex_lock_nested+0x9d/0x2e0
[<c01e0f0c>] sysfs_addrm_start+0x2c/0xb0
[<c01e14a0>] create_dir+0x40/0x90
[<c01e1556>] sysfs_create_subdir+0x16/0x20
[<c01e2770>] internal_create_group+0x50/0x1a0
[<c01e28ec>] sysfs_create_group+0xc/0x10
[<f81674fc>] cpufreq_stat_notifier_policy+0x9c/0x230 [cpufreq_stats]
[<c036b007>] notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x80
[<c0144d24>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x44/0x60
[<c0144d5a>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x20
[<c02c0226>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0xd6/0x230
[<c02c14a8>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x4e8/0x6b0
[<c029d5a5>] sysdev_driver_register+0x75/0x130
[<c02bff55>] cpufreq_register_driver+0xb5/0x1c0
[<f808b0bd>] uinput_destroy_device+0x4d/0x60 [uinput]
[<c010111a>] do_one_initcall+0x2a/0x160
[<c015bdf5>] sys_init_module+0x85/0x1b0
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #1 ((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem){----}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c0367441>] down_read+0x41/0x60
[<c0144d0a>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x2a/0x60
[<c0144d5a>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x20
[<c02c1165>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x1a5/0x6b0
[<c029d5a5>] sysdev_driver_register+0x75/0x130
[<c02bff55>] cpufreq_register_driver+0xb5/0x1c0
[<f808b0bd>] uinput_destroy_device+0x4d/0x60 [uinput]
[<c010111a>] do_one_initcall+0x2a/0x160
[<c015bdf5>] sys_init_module+0x85/0x1b0
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #0 (&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){----}:
[<c0151cbb>] validate_chain+0x5eb/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c03674a1>] down_write+0x41/0x60
[<c02c0da1>] lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x31/0x70
[<c03655a5>] cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x45/0x80
[<c036b007>] notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x80
[<c0144b49>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x19/0x20
[<c03574c9>] _cpu_down+0x79/0x280
[<c012da5c>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x7c/0x100
[<c015cac5>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xd5/0x170
[<c015cd40>] enter_state+0x1b0/0x1c0
[<c015cddf>] state_store+0x8f/0xd0
[<c0228cf4>] kobj_attr_store+0x24/0x30
[<c01e02d2>] sysfs_write_file+0xa2/0x100
[<c0196e89>] vfs_write+0x99/0x130
[<c01973cd>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
other info that might help us debug this:
4 locks held by sleep.sh/6730:
#0: (&buffer->mutex){--..}, at: [<c01e025b>] sysfs_write_file+0x2b/0x100
#1: (pm_mutex){--..}, at: [<c015cbdb>] enter_state+0x4b/0x1c0
#2: (cpu_add_remove_lock){--..}, at: [<c012d83f>] cpu_maps_update_begin+0xf/0x20
#3: (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}, at: [<c012d89a>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x1a/0x50
stack backtrace:
Pid: 6730, comm: sleep.sh Not tainted 2.6.29-rc4-mst-debug #95
Call Trace:
[<c015166c>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x7c/0xe0
[<c0151cbb>] validate_chain+0x5eb/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c013cf1e>] ? __cancel_work_timer+0x2e/0x190
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c02c0da1>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x31/0x70
[<c03674a1>] down_write+0x41/0x60
[<c02c0da1>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x31/0x70
[<c02c0da1>] lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x31/0x70
[<c03655a5>] cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x45/0x80
[<c036b007>] notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x80
[<c0144b49>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x19/0x20
[<c03574c9>] _cpu_down+0x79/0x280
[<c012d83f>] ? cpu_maps_update_begin+0xf/0x20
[<c012da5c>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x7c/0x100
[<c02531cb>] ? acpi_disable_all_gpes+0x25/0x2a
[<c015cac5>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xd5/0x170
[<c015cd40>] enter_state+0x1b0/0x1c0
[<c015cddf>] state_store+0x8f/0xd0
[<c015cd50>] ? state_store+0x0/0xd0
[<c0228cf4>] kobj_attr_store+0x24/0x30
[<c01e02d2>] sysfs_write_file+0xa2/0x100
[<c0196e89>] vfs_write+0x99/0x130
[<c0103247>] ? sysenter_exit+0xf/0x18
[<c01e0230>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0x100
[<c01973cd>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-02-10 22:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-02-10 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Airlie, dri-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki
Dave, dri guys,
Could you take a look at this circular dependency please (below)? I
observe it when suspending laptop with radeon drm loaded and with
lockdep enabled. It seems that the root of the problem is that
various vm ops such as drm_vm_open, drm_mmap) are called with mm
semaphore taken, and take dev->struct_mutex. On the other hand,
drm_rmmap_locked is called with dev->struct_mutex, and calls mtrr_del
which depends on mm semaphore indirectly.
What do you think?
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (11 days old)
/var/log/message dump below.
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.29-rc4-mst-debug #95
-------------------------------------------------------
sleep.sh/6730 is trying to acquire lock:
(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){----}, at: [<c02c0da1>] lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x31/0x70
but task is already holding lock:
(&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}, at: [<c012d89a>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x1a/0x50
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #6 (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c0366c5d>] mutex_lock_nested+0x9d/0x2e0
[<c012d8fc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
[<c010d96f>] mtrr_del_page+0x2f/0x160
[<c010dada>] mtrr_del+0x3a/0x50
[<f851a342>] drm_rmmap_locked+0xc2/0x180 [drm]
[<f8521d31>] drm_master_destroy+0x151/0x160 [drm]
[<c022a37c>] kref_put+0x2c/0x80
[<f8521af2>] drm_master_put+0x12/0x20 [drm]
[<f851dd1b>] drm_release+0x25b/0x4a0 [drm]
[<c019781d>] __fput+0xbd/0x1d0
[<c0197c09>] fput+0x19/0x20
[<c0194a47>] filp_close+0x47/0x70
[<c0194ada>] sys_close+0x6a/0xc0
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #5 (&dev->struct_mutex){--..}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c0366c5d>] mutex_lock_nested+0x9d/0x2e0
[<f8522add>] drm_vm_open+0x2d/0x50 [drm]
[<c012a397>] dup_mm+0x227/0x310
[<c012b22f>] copy_process+0xd7f/0x1020
[<c012b5e8>] do_fork+0x78/0x320
[<c01017ef>] sys_clone+0x2f/0x40
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #4 (&mm->mmap_sem/1){--..}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c01441e8>] down_write_nested+0x48/0x70
[<c012a238>] dup_mm+0xc8/0x310
[<c012b22f>] copy_process+0xd7f/0x1020
[<c012b5e8>] do_fork+0x78/0x320
[<c01017ef>] sys_clone+0x2f/0x40
[<c0103292>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){----}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c0183d73>] might_fault+0x73/0x90
[<c022f633>] copy_to_user+0x33/0x60
[<c01a3975>] filldir64+0xb5/0xe0
[<c01e0c2f>] sysfs_readdir+0x11f/0x1f0
[<c01a3b0d>] vfs_readdir+0x8d/0xb0
[<c01a3b99>] sys_getdents64+0x69/0xc0
[<c0103292>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #2 (sysfs_mutex){--..}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c0366c5d>] mutex_lock_nested+0x9d/0x2e0
[<c01e0f0c>] sysfs_addrm_start+0x2c/0xb0
[<c01e14a0>] create_dir+0x40/0x90
[<c01e1556>] sysfs_create_subdir+0x16/0x20
[<c01e2770>] internal_create_group+0x50/0x1a0
[<c01e28ec>] sysfs_create_group+0xc/0x10
[<f81674fc>] cpufreq_stat_notifier_policy+0x9c/0x230 [cpufreq_stats]
[<c036b007>] notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x80
[<c0144d24>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x44/0x60
[<c0144d5a>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x20
[<c02c0226>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0xd6/0x230
[<c02c14a8>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x4e8/0x6b0
[<c029d5a5>] sysdev_driver_register+0x75/0x130
[<c02bff55>] cpufreq_register_driver+0xb5/0x1c0
[<f808b0bd>] uinput_destroy_device+0x4d/0x60 [uinput]
[<c010111a>] do_one_initcall+0x2a/0x160
[<c015bdf5>] sys_init_module+0x85/0x1b0
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #1 ((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem){----}:
[<c0152221>] validate_chain+0xb51/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c0367441>] down_read+0x41/0x60
[<c0144d0a>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x2a/0x60
[<c0144d5a>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x20
[<c02c1165>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x1a5/0x6b0
[<c029d5a5>] sysdev_driver_register+0x75/0x130
[<c02bff55>] cpufreq_register_driver+0xb5/0x1c0
[<f808b0bd>] uinput_destroy_device+0x4d/0x60 [uinput]
[<c010111a>] do_one_initcall+0x2a/0x160
[<c015bdf5>] sys_init_module+0x85/0x1b0
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #0 (&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){----}:
[<c0151cbb>] validate_chain+0x5eb/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c03674a1>] down_write+0x41/0x60
[<c02c0da1>] lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x31/0x70
[<c03655a5>] cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x45/0x80
[<c036b007>] notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x80
[<c0144b49>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x19/0x20
[<c03574c9>] _cpu_down+0x79/0x280
[<c012da5c>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x7c/0x100
[<c015cac5>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xd5/0x170
[<c015cd40>] enter_state+0x1b0/0x1c0
[<c015cddf>] state_store+0x8f/0xd0
[<c0228cf4>] kobj_attr_store+0x24/0x30
[<c01e02d2>] sysfs_write_file+0xa2/0x100
[<c0196e89>] vfs_write+0x99/0x130
[<c01973cd>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
other info that might help us debug this:
4 locks held by sleep.sh/6730:
#0: (&buffer->mutex){--..}, at: [<c01e025b>] sysfs_write_file+0x2b/0x100
#1: (pm_mutex){--..}, at: [<c015cbdb>] enter_state+0x4b/0x1c0
#2: (cpu_add_remove_lock){--..}, at: [<c012d83f>] cpu_maps_update_begin+0xf/0x20
#3: (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}, at: [<c012d89a>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x1a/0x50
stack backtrace:
Pid: 6730, comm: sleep.sh Not tainted 2.6.29-rc4-mst-debug #95
Call Trace:
[<c015166c>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x7c/0xe0
[<c0151cbb>] validate_chain+0x5eb/0x1150
[<c0152a66>] __lock_acquire+0x246/0xa50
[<c013cf1e>] ? __cancel_work_timer+0x2e/0x190
[<c01532d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[<c02c0da1>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x31/0x70
[<c03674a1>] down_write+0x41/0x60
[<c02c0da1>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x31/0x70
[<c02c0da1>] lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x31/0x70
[<c03655a5>] cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x45/0x80
[<c036b007>] notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x80
[<c0144b49>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x19/0x20
[<c03574c9>] _cpu_down+0x79/0x280
[<c012d83f>] ? cpu_maps_update_begin+0xf/0x20
[<c012da5c>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x7c/0x100
[<c02531cb>] ? acpi_disable_all_gpes+0x25/0x2a
[<c015cac5>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xd5/0x170
[<c015cd40>] enter_state+0x1b0/0x1c0
[<c015cddf>] state_store+0x8f/0xd0
[<c015cd50>] ? state_store+0x0/0xd0
[<c0228cf4>] kobj_attr_store+0x24/0x30
[<c01e02d2>] sysfs_write_file+0xa2/0x100
[<c0196e89>] vfs_write+0x99/0x130
[<c0103247>] ? sysenter_exit+0xf/0x18
[<c01e0230>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0x100
[<c01973cd>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
[<c0103215>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-02-08 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-09 13:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-02-09 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
I have verified that this still occurs on 2.6.29-rc4.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (11 days old)
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-02-09 13:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-02-09 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
I have verified that this still occurs on 2.6.29-rc4.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
> Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
> Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (11 days old)
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-02-08 19:05 2.6.29-rc4: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-08 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-08 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (11 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-02-08 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-08 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (11 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-02-04 10:21 2.6.29-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-04 10:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-04 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (7 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-02-04 10:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 159+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-04 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12574
Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 11:35 (7 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 159+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-06 21:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 159+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-03 19:22 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:22 ` [Bug #12414] iwl4965 cannot use "ap auto" on latest 2.6.28/29? Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12490] ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12419] possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12418] Repeated ioctl(4, 0x40046445, ..) loop in glxgears Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12499] Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12444] X hangs following switch from radeonfb console - Bisected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-07 22:27 ` Graham Murray
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12497] new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 22:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-03-03 22:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-03-03 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-04 23:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-03-04 23:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12668] USB flash disk surprise disconnect Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12501] build bug in eeepc-laptop.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-04 9:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-04 9:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-07 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-07 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-08 3:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-08 3:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12670] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at pin_to_kill+0x21 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12680] Entropy pool problem Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12671] uvc_status_cleanup(): undefined reference to `input_unregister_device' Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12681] s2ram: fails to wake up on Acer Extensa 4220 (SMP disabled) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12758] ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12761] Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-04 6:43 ` Nico Schottelius
2009-03-04 6:43 ` Nico Schottelius
2009-03-07 21:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-07 21:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-04 4:25 ` Len Brown
2009-04-04 4:25 ` Len Brown
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12763] Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12762] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 22:07 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-03 22:07 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-03 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-05 12:50 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-05 12:50 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12764] Can not ioremap virtual address for G33 hw status page Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12771] Oops in i915_gem_flush Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12792] 2.6.29-rc6-git4 boot failure Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12778] regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12765] i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12769] 3D performance gets very choppy after suspend/resume cycle (intel video) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12804] some tc commands fail Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12800] x86 PAT invalid vm_insert_pfn assumptions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12805] QinQ vlan trunking regression Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12806] i915 broken STR Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-04 16:47 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-03-04 16:47 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-03-07 5:53 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-03-07 5:53 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-03-07 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-07 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-10 2:23 ` Eric Anholt
2009-03-10 2:33 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-03-10 2:33 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-03-10 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-10 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-10 17:32 ` Eric Anholt
2009-03-10 17:32 ` Eric Anholt
2009-03-10 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-10 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12808] Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12811] undefined reference to `physmap_set_partitions' on powerpc Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-05 1:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-03-05 1:09 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <1236218012.2567.115.camel@ymzhang>
[not found] ` <20090305020408.GA26425@localhost>
[not found] ` <1236219189.2567.123.camel@ymzhang>
2009-03-05 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-07 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-07 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-04 1:03 ` 2.6.29-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Zhang Rui
2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04 1:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-07 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-07 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-04 1:03 ` Zhang Rui
2009-03-04 1:15 ` Zhang Rui
2009-03-07 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-07 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-04 1:21 ` Zhang Rui
2009-03-04 1:21 ` Zhang Rui
2009-03-07 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200903072312.30158.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-04 7:40 ` Len Brown
2009-04-04 7:40 ` Len Brown
2009-03-04 19:14 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-03-04 19:14 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-03-04 19:14 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-03-07 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <8db1092f0903041114o767d0079s4c1626dae5335d70-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-07 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-07 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-06 18:54 2.6.29-git13: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-06 19:05 ` [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-06 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-21 16:28 2.6.29-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-21 16:39 ` [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-21 16:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-14 19:01 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-14 19:05 ` [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-14 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-16 0:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-03-16 0:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-03-19 13:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-23 21:45 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-23 21:48 ` [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-23 21:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-14 20:35 2.6.29-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-14 20:38 ` [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-14 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-08 19:05 2.6.29-rc4: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-08 19:21 ` [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-08 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-09 13:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-02-09 13:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-02-10 22:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-02-10 22:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-02-10 22:41 ` Eric Anholt
2009-02-10 22:41 ` Eric Anholt
2009-02-11 7:10 ` Thomas Hellström
2009-02-11 7:10 ` Thomas Hellström
2009-02-04 10:21 2.6.29-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 10:24 ` [Bug #12574] possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 10:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.