From: anfei <anfei.zhou@gmail.com> To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>, nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/4] oom: select_bad_process: PF_EXITING check should take ->mm into account Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 21:05:19 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100406130518.GB3965@desktop> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20100406121811.GA6802@redhat.com> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 02:18:11PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 04/06, anfei wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 08:32:16PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > select_bad_process() checks PF_EXITING to detect the task which > > > is going to release its memory, but the logic is very wrong. > > > > > > - a single process P with the dead group leader disables > > > select_bad_process() completely, it will always return > > > ERR_PTR() while P can live forever > > > > > > - if the PF_EXITING task has already released its ->mm > > > it doesn't make sense to expect it is goiing to free > > > more memory (except task_struct/etc) > > > > > > Change the code to ignore the PF_EXITING tasks without ->mm. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> > > > --- > > > > > > mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > --- MM/mm/oom_kill.c~2_FIX_PF_EXITING 2010-04-02 18:51:05.000000000 +0200 > > > +++ MM/mm/oom_kill.c 2010-04-02 18:58:37.000000000 +0200 > > > @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr > > > * the process of exiting and releasing its resources. > > > * Otherwise we could get an easy OOM deadlock. > > > */ > > > - if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) { > > > + if ((p->flags & PF_EXITING) && p->mm) { > > > > Even this check is satisfied, it still can't say p is a good victim or > > it will release memory automatically if multi threaded, as the exiting > > of p doesn't mean the other threads are going to exit, so the ->mm won't > > be released. > > Yes, completely agreed. > > Unfortunately I forgot to copy this into the changelog, but when I > discussed this change I mentioned "still not perfect, but much better". > > I do not really know what is the "right" solution. Even if we fix this > check for mt case, we also have CLONE_VM tasks. > What about checking mm->mm_users too? If there are any other users, just let badness judge. CLONE_VM tasks but not mt seem rare, and badness doesn't consider it too. > So, this patch just tries to improve things, to avoid the easy-to-trigger > false positives. > Agreed. Thanks, Anfei. > Oleg. >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: anfei <anfei.zhou@gmail.com> To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>, nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/4] oom: select_bad_process: PF_EXITING check should take ->mm into account Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 21:05:19 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100406130518.GB3965@desktop> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20100406121811.GA6802@redhat.com> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 02:18:11PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 04/06, anfei wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 08:32:16PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > select_bad_process() checks PF_EXITING to detect the task which > > > is going to release its memory, but the logic is very wrong. > > > > > > - a single process P with the dead group leader disables > > > select_bad_process() completely, it will always return > > > ERR_PTR() while P can live forever > > > > > > - if the PF_EXITING task has already released its ->mm > > > it doesn't make sense to expect it is goiing to free > > > more memory (except task_struct/etc) > > > > > > Change the code to ignore the PF_EXITING tasks without ->mm. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> > > > --- > > > > > > mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > --- MM/mm/oom_kill.c~2_FIX_PF_EXITING 2010-04-02 18:51:05.000000000 +0200 > > > +++ MM/mm/oom_kill.c 2010-04-02 18:58:37.000000000 +0200 > > > @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr > > > * the process of exiting and releasing its resources. > > > * Otherwise we could get an easy OOM deadlock. > > > */ > > > - if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) { > > > + if ((p->flags & PF_EXITING) && p->mm) { > > > > Even this check is satisfied, it still can't say p is a good victim or > > it will release memory automatically if multi threaded, as the exiting > > of p doesn't mean the other threads are going to exit, so the ->mm won't > > be released. > > Yes, completely agreed. > > Unfortunately I forgot to copy this into the changelog, but when I > discussed this change I mentioned "still not perfect, but much better". > > I do not really know what is the "right" solution. Even if we fix this > check for mt case, we also have CLONE_VM tasks. > What about checking mm->mm_users too? If there are any other users, just let badness judge. CLONE_VM tasks but not mt seem rare, and badness doesn't consider it too. > So, this patch just tries to improve things, to avoid the easy-to-trigger > false positives. > Agreed. Thanks, Anfei. > Oleg. > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-06 13:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 197+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-03-24 16:25 [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop Anfei Zhou 2010-03-24 16:25 ` Anfei Zhou 2010-03-25 2:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2010-03-25 2:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2010-03-26 22:08 ` Andrew Morton 2010-03-26 22:08 ` Andrew Morton 2010-03-26 22:33 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-26 22:33 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-28 14:55 ` anfei 2010-03-28 14:55 ` anfei 2010-03-28 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-28 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-28 21:21 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-28 21:21 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-29 11:21 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-29 11:21 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-29 20:49 ` [patch] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed David Rientjes 2010-03-29 20:49 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-30 15:46 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-30 15:46 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-30 20:26 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-30 20:26 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 17:58 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 17:58 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 20:47 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 20:47 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 8:35 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 8:35 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 8:57 ` [patch -mm] oom: hold tasklist_lock when dumping tasks David Rientjes 2010-04-01 14:27 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 19:16 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 13:59 ` [patch] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 14:00 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 19:12 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 19:12 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-02 11:14 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 11:14 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 18:30 ` [PATCH -mm 0/4] oom: linux has threads Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 18:31 ` [PATCH -mm 1/4] oom: select_bad_process: check PF_KTHREAD instead of !mm to skip kthreads Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 18:31 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 19:05 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-02 19:05 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-02 18:32 ` [PATCH -mm 2/4] oom: select_bad_process: PF_EXITING check should take ->mm into account Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 18:32 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-06 11:42 ` anfei 2010-04-06 11:42 ` anfei 2010-04-06 12:18 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-06 12:18 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-06 13:05 ` anfei [this message] 2010-04-06 13:05 ` anfei 2010-04-06 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-06 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 18:32 ` [PATCH -mm 3/4] oom: introduce find_lock_task_mm() to fix !mm false positives Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 18:32 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 18:33 ` [PATCH -mm 4/4] oom: oom_forkbomb_penalty: move thread_group_cputime() out of task_lock() Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 18:33 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 19:04 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-02 19:04 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-05 14:23 ` [PATCH -mm] oom: select_bad_process: never choose tasks with badness == 0 Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-05 14:23 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 19:02 ` [patch] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed David Rientjes 2010-04-02 19:02 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-02 19:14 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 19:14 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 19:46 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-02 19:46 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-02 19:54 ` [patch -mm] oom: exclude tasks with badness score of 0 from being selected David Rientjes 2010-04-02 19:54 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-02 21:04 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 21:04 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 21:22 ` [patch -mm v2] " David Rientjes 2010-04-02 21:22 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-02 20:55 ` [patch] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-02 20:55 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 21:07 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 21:07 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 22:50 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 22:50 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 23:30 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 23:30 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 23:48 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 23:48 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 14:39 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 14:39 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 18:58 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 18:58 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 8:25 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 8:25 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 15:26 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 15:26 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-08 21:08 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-08 21:08 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-09 12:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-09 12:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-30 16:39 ` [PATCH] oom: fix the unsafe proc_oom_score()->badness() call Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-30 16:39 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-30 17:43 ` [PATCH -mm] proc: don't take ->siglock for /proc/pid/oom_adj Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-30 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-30 20:30 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-30 20:30 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 9:17 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 9:17 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 18:59 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 18:59 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 21:14 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 21:14 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 23:00 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 23:00 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 8:32 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 8:32 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 15:37 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 15:37 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 19:04 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 19:04 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-30 20:32 ` [PATCH] oom: fix the unsafe proc_oom_score()->badness() call David Rientjes 2010-03-30 20:32 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 9:16 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 9:16 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-31 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 7:41 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 7:41 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 13:13 ` [PATCH 0/1] oom: fix the unsafe usage of badness() in proc_oom_score() Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 13:13 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 13:13 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 13:13 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-04-01 19:03 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-01 19:03 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-29 14:06 ` [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop anfei 2010-03-29 14:06 ` anfei 2010-03-29 20:01 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-29 20:01 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-30 14:29 ` anfei 2010-03-30 14:29 ` anfei 2010-03-30 20:29 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-30 20:29 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-03-31 0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-03-31 6:07 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 6:07 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 6:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-03-31 6:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-03-31 6:30 ` Balbir Singh 2010-03-31 6:30 ` Balbir Singh 2010-03-31 6:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-03-31 6:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-03-31 7:04 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 7:04 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 6:32 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 6:32 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-31 7:08 ` [patch -mm] memcg: make oom killer a no-op when no killable task can be found David Rientjes 2010-03-31 7:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-03-31 8:04 ` Balbir Singh 2010-03-31 10:38 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-04 23:28 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-05 21:30 ` Andrew Morton 2010-04-05 22:40 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-05 22:49 ` Andrew Morton 2010-04-05 23:01 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-06 12:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2010-04-06 21:47 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-07 0:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-04-07 13:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2010-04-08 18:05 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-21 19:17 ` Andrew Morton 2010-04-21 22:04 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-22 0:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-04-22 8:34 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-27 22:58 ` [patch -mm] oom: reintroduce and deprecate oom_kill_allocating_task David Rientjes 2010-04-28 0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-04-22 7:23 ` [patch -mm] memcg: make oom killer a no-op when no killable task can be found Nick Piggin 2010-04-22 7:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-04-22 10:09 ` Nick Piggin 2010-04-22 10:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2010-04-22 21:11 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-22 10:28 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-22 15:39 ` Nick Piggin 2010-04-22 21:09 ` David Rientjes 2010-05-04 23:55 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-08 17:36 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-02 10:17 ` [PATCH] oom killer: break from infinite loop Mel Gorman 2010-04-02 10:17 ` Mel Gorman 2010-04-04 23:26 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-04 23:26 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-05 10:47 ` Mel Gorman 2010-04-05 10:47 ` Mel Gorman 2010-04-06 22:40 ` David Rientjes 2010-04-06 22:40 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-29 11:31 ` anfei 2010-03-29 11:31 ` anfei 2010-03-29 11:46 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-29 11:46 ` Oleg Nesterov 2010-03-29 12:09 ` anfei 2010-03-29 12:09 ` anfei 2010-03-28 2:46 ` David Rientjes 2010-03-28 2:46 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100406130518.GB3965@desktop \ --to=anfei.zhou@gmail.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \ --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \ --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \ --cc=oleg@redhat.com \ --cc=rientjes@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.