* 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)
@ 2010-08-26 7:30 Tino Keitel
2010-08-26 7:55 ` Tino Keitel
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tino Keitel @ 2010-08-26 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, intel-gfx
Hi,
booting 2.6.36-rc2-git4 (commit
d4348c678977c7093438bbbf2067c49396ae941b) results in a screen
resolution of 1024x768 instead of 1680x1050. It works fine with
2.6.35.2.
The framebuffer console uses the correct resolution, but only uses a
part of the screen for text output. Xorg output looks distorted.
Xorg log is attached.
$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096
VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DVI1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
454mm x 284mm
1680x1050 59.9 +
1280x1024 60.0
1280x960 60.0
1024x768 60.0*
800x600 60.3
640x480 60.0
720x400 70.1
TV1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
0mm x 0mm
848x480 30.0 +
640x480 30.0 +
1024x768 30.0*
800x600 30.0
This is a Mac mini Core 2 Duo with Intel i945 graphics.
Regards,
Tino
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)
2010-08-26 7:30 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050) Tino Keitel
@ 2010-08-26 7:55 ` Tino Keitel
2010-08-27 13:42 ` Tino Keitel
2010-08-29 13:19 ` Maciej Rutecki
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tino Keitel @ 2010-08-26 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:30:39 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
[...]
> Xorg log is attached.
It wasn't. Not it is attached.
Regards,
Tino
[-- Attachment #2: Xorg.0.log.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 5468 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)
@ 2010-08-26 7:55 ` Tino Keitel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tino Keitel @ 2010-08-26 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:30:39 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
[...]
> Xorg log is attached.
It wasn't. Not it is attached.
Regards,
Tino
[-- Attachment #2: Xorg.0.log.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 5468 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)
2010-08-26 7:30 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050) Tino Keitel
@ 2010-08-27 13:42 ` Tino Keitel
2010-08-27 13:42 ` Tino Keitel
2010-08-29 13:19 ` Maciej Rutecki
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tino Keitel @ 2010-08-27 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, intel-gfx
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:30:39 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> booting 2.6.36-rc2-git4 (commit
> d4348c678977c7093438bbbf2067c49396ae941b) results in a screen
> resolution of 1024x768 instead of 1680x1050. It works fine with
> 2.6.35.2.
>
> The framebuffer console uses the correct resolution, but only uses a
> part of the screen for text output. Xorg output looks distorted.
>
> Xorg log is attached.
>
> $ xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096
> VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> DVI1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> 454mm x 284mm
> 1680x1050 59.9 +
> 1280x1024 60.0
> 1280x960 60.0
> 1024x768 60.0*
> 800x600 60.3
> 640x480 60.0
> 720x400 70.1
> TV1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> 0mm x 0mm
> 848x480 30.0 +
> 640x480 30.0 +
> 1024x768 30.0*
> 800x600 30.0
There is no TV connected, and it was correctly reported as
"disconnected" with 2.6.35.
The Mac mini has some special EDID handling, as the EDID data comes
from the analog EDID channel IIRC, if that helps.
Regards,
Tino
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)
@ 2010-08-27 13:42 ` Tino Keitel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tino Keitel @ 2010-08-27 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, intel-gfx
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:30:39 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> booting 2.6.36-rc2-git4 (commit
> d4348c678977c7093438bbbf2067c49396ae941b) results in a screen
> resolution of 1024x768 instead of 1680x1050. It works fine with
> 2.6.35.2.
>
> The framebuffer console uses the correct resolution, but only uses a
> part of the screen for text output. Xorg output looks distorted.
>
> Xorg log is attached.
>
> $ xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096
> VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> DVI1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> 454mm x 284mm
> 1680x1050 59.9 +
> 1280x1024 60.0
> 1280x960 60.0
> 1024x768 60.0*
> 800x600 60.3
> 640x480 60.0
> 720x400 70.1
> TV1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> 0mm x 0mm
> 848x480 30.0 +
> 640x480 30.0 +
> 1024x768 30.0*
> 800x600 30.0
There is no TV connected, and it was correctly reported as
"disconnected" with 2.6.35.
The Mac mini has some special EDID handling, as the EDID data comes
from the analog EDID channel IIRC, if that helps.
Regards,
Tino
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)
2010-08-26 7:30 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050) Tino Keitel
2010-08-26 7:55 ` Tino Keitel
2010-08-27 13:42 ` Tino Keitel
@ 2010-08-29 13:19 ` Maciej Rutecki
2010-08-30 17:37 ` Tino Keitel
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Rutecki @ 2010-08-29 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tino Keitel; +Cc: linux-kernel, intel-gfx
On czwartek, 26 sierpnia 2010 o 09:30:39 Tino Keitel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> booting 2.6.36-rc2-git4 (commit
> d4348c678977c7093438bbbf2067c49396ae941b) results in a screen
> resolution of 1024x768 instead of 1680x1050. It works fine with
> 2.6.35.2.
>
> The framebuffer console uses the correct resolution, but only uses a
> part of the screen for text output. Xorg output looks distorted.
>
> Xorg log is attached.
>
> $ xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096
> VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> DVI1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> 454mm x 284mm
> 1680x1050 59.9 +
> 1280x1024 60.0
> 1280x960 60.0
> 1024x768 60.0*
> 800x600 60.3
> 640x480 60.0
> 720x400 70.1
> TV1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> 0mm x 0mm
> 848x480 30.0 +
> 640x480 30.0 +
> 1024x768 30.0*
> 800x600 30.0
>
> This is a Mac mini Core 2 Duo with Intel i945 graphics.
>
Seems be similar to:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17301
Regards
--
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.maciek.unixy.pl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)
2010-08-29 13:19 ` Maciej Rutecki
@ 2010-08-30 17:37 ` Tino Keitel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tino Keitel @ 2010-08-30 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej Rutecki; +Cc: linux-kernel, intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 645 bytes --]
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 15:19:20 +0200, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> > TV1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> > 0mm x 0mm
> > 848x480 30.0 +
> > 640x480 30.0 +
> > 1024x768 30.0*
> > 800x600 30.0
> >
> > This is a Mac mini Core 2 Duo with Intel i945 graphics.
> >
>
> Seems be similar to:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17301
Maybe. I don't know if this is connected, but after disabling TV out
using the attached patch, the screen has no signal after suspend to
RAM. However, the patch helped to get back the native LCD resolution
after boot.
Regards,
Tino
[-- Attachment #2: disable_tv_out.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1185 bytes --]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
index 4f00390..1d306a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
*
* Derived from Xorg ddx, xf86-video-intel, src/i830_video.c
*/
+
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include "drmP.h"
#include "drm.h"
#include "i915_drm.h"
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c
index d2029ef..f71e488 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c
@@ -1279,6 +1279,8 @@ intel_tv_detect_type (struct intel_tv *intel_tv)
* 1 0 X svideo
* 0 0 0 Component
*/
+ type = -1;
+ goto out;
if ((tv_dac & TVDAC_SENSE_MASK) == (TVDAC_B_SENSE | TVDAC_C_SENSE)) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Detected Composite TV connection\n");
type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_Composite;
@@ -1292,7 +1294,7 @@ intel_tv_detect_type (struct intel_tv *intel_tv)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No TV connection detected\n");
type = -1;
}
-
+out:
/* Restore interrupt config */
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->user_irq_lock, irqflags);
i915_enable_pipestat(dev_priv, 0, PIPE_HOTPLUG_INTERRUPT_ENABLE |
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)
@ 2010-08-30 17:37 ` Tino Keitel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tino Keitel @ 2010-08-30 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej Rutecki; +Cc: intel-gfx, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 645 bytes --]
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 15:19:20 +0200, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> > TV1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> > 0mm x 0mm
> > 848x480 30.0 +
> > 640x480 30.0 +
> > 1024x768 30.0*
> > 800x600 30.0
> >
> > This is a Mac mini Core 2 Duo with Intel i945 graphics.
> >
>
> Seems be similar to:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17301
Maybe. I don't know if this is connected, but after disabling TV out
using the attached patch, the screen has no signal after suspend to
RAM. However, the patch helped to get back the native LCD resolution
after boot.
Regards,
Tino
[-- Attachment #2: disable_tv_out.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1185 bytes --]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
index 4f00390..1d306a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
*
* Derived from Xorg ddx, xf86-video-intel, src/i830_video.c
*/
+
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include "drmP.h"
#include "drm.h"
#include "i915_drm.h"
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c
index d2029ef..f71e488 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c
@@ -1279,6 +1279,8 @@ intel_tv_detect_type (struct intel_tv *intel_tv)
* 1 0 X svideo
* 0 0 0 Component
*/
+ type = -1;
+ goto out;
if ((tv_dac & TVDAC_SENSE_MASK) == (TVDAC_B_SENSE | TVDAC_C_SENSE)) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Detected Composite TV connection\n");
type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_Composite;
@@ -1292,7 +1294,7 @@ intel_tv_detect_type (struct intel_tv *intel_tv)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No TV connection detected\n");
type = -1;
}
-
+out:
/* Restore interrupt config */
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->user_irq_lock, irqflags);
i915_enable_pipestat(dev_priv, 0, PIPE_HOTPLUG_INTERRUPT_ENABLE |
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-30 17:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-26 7:30 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050) Tino Keitel
2010-08-26 7:55 ` Tino Keitel
2010-08-26 7:55 ` Tino Keitel
2010-08-27 13:42 ` Tino Keitel
2010-08-27 13:42 ` Tino Keitel
2010-08-29 13:19 ` Maciej Rutecki
2010-08-30 17:37 ` Tino Keitel
2010-08-30 17:37 ` Tino Keitel
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.