All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	david@fromorbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, cmm@us.ibm.com,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] fs: add hole punching to fallocate
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:14:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101116131451.GH4757@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101116125249.GB31957@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com>

On Tue 16-11-10 07:52:50, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:43:46PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 16-11-10 12:16:11, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 15-11-10 12:05:18, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
> > > > index 4197b9e..ab8dedf 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/open.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/open.c
> > > > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ int do_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> > > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* Return error if mode is not supported */
> > > > -	if (mode && !(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
> > > > +	if (mode && (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)))
> > >   Why not just:
> > > if (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)) ?
> >   And BTW, since FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE does not change the file size, should
> > not we enforce that FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE is / is not set? I don't mind too
> > much which way but keeping it ambiguous (ignored) in the interface usually
> > proves as a bad idea in future when we want to further extend the interface...
> >
> 
> Yeah I went back and forth on this.  KEEP_SIZE won't change the behavior of
> PUNCH_HOLE since PUNCH_HOLE implicitly means keep the size.  I figured since its
> "mode" and not "flags" it would be ok to make either way accepted, but if you
> prefer PUNCH_HOLE means you have to have KEEP_SIZE set then I'm cool with that,
> just let me know one way or the other.  Thanks,
  I was wondering about 'mode' vs 'flags' as well. The manpage says:
The mode argument determines the operation to be performed on the given
range.  Currently only one flag is supported for mode...
  So we call it "mode" but speak about "flags"? Seems a bit inconsistent.
I'd maybe lean a bit at the "flags" side and just make sure that
only one of FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE is set (interpreting
FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE as allocate blocks beyond i_size). But I'm not sure
what others think.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, cmm@us.ibm.com,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] fs: add hole punching to fallocate
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:14:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101116131451.GH4757@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101116125249.GB31957@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com>

On Tue 16-11-10 07:52:50, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:43:46PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 16-11-10 12:16:11, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 15-11-10 12:05:18, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
> > > > index 4197b9e..ab8dedf 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/open.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/open.c
> > > > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ int do_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> > > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* Return error if mode is not supported */
> > > > -	if (mode && !(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
> > > > +	if (mode && (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)))
> > >   Why not just:
> > > if (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)) ?
> >   And BTW, since FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE does not change the file size, should
> > not we enforce that FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE is / is not set? I don't mind too
> > much which way but keeping it ambiguous (ignored) in the interface usually
> > proves as a bad idea in future when we want to further extend the interface...
> >
> 
> Yeah I went back and forth on this.  KEEP_SIZE won't change the behavior of
> PUNCH_HOLE since PUNCH_HOLE implicitly means keep the size.  I figured since its
> "mode" and not "flags" it would be ok to make either way accepted, but if you
> prefer PUNCH_HOLE means you have to have KEEP_SIZE set then I'm cool with that,
> just let me know one way or the other.  Thanks,
  I was wondering about 'mode' vs 'flags' as well. The manpage says:
The mode argument determines the operation to be performed on the given
range.  Currently only one flag is supported for mode...
  So we call it "mode" but speak about "flags"? Seems a bit inconsistent.
I'd maybe lean a bit at the "flags" side and just make sure that
only one of FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE is set (interpreting
FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE as allocate blocks beyond i_size). But I'm not sure
what others think.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	david@fromorbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, cmm@us.ibm.com,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/6] fs: add hole punching to fallocate
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:14:57 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101116131451.GH4757@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101116125249.GB31957@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com>

On Tue 16-11-10 07:52:50, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:43:46PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 16-11-10 12:16:11, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 15-11-10 12:05:18, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
> > > > index 4197b9e..ab8dedf 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/open.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/open.c
> > > > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ int do_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> > > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* Return error if mode is not supported */
> > > > -	if (mode && !(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
> > > > +	if (mode && (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)))
> > >   Why not just:
> > > if (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)) ?
> >   And BTW, since FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE does not change the file size, should
> > not we enforce that FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE is / is not set? I don't mind too
> > much which way but keeping it ambiguous (ignored) in the interface usually
> > proves as a bad idea in future when we want to further extend the interface...
> >
> 
> Yeah I went back and forth on this.  KEEP_SIZE won't change the behavior of
> PUNCH_HOLE since PUNCH_HOLE implicitly means keep the size.  I figured since its
> "mode" and not "flags" it would be ok to make either way accepted, but if you
> prefer PUNCH_HOLE means you have to have KEEP_SIZE set then I'm cool with that,
> just let me know one way or the other.  Thanks,
  I was wondering about 'mode' vs 'flags' as well. The manpage says:
The mode argument determines the operation to be performed on the given
range.  Currently only one flag is supported for mode...
  So we call it "mode" but speak about "flags"? Seems a bit inconsistent.
I'd maybe lean a bit at the "flags" side and just make sure that
only one of FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE is set (interpreting
FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE as allocate blocks beyond i_size). But I'm not sure
what others think.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/6] fs: add hole punching to fallocate
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:14:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101116131451.GH4757@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101116125249.GB31957@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com>

On Tue 16-11-10 07:52:50, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:43:46PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 16-11-10 12:16:11, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 15-11-10 12:05:18, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
> > > > index 4197b9e..ab8dedf 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/open.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/open.c
> > > > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ int do_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> > > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* Return error if mode is not supported */
> > > > -	if (mode && !(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
> > > > +	if (mode && (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)))
> > >   Why not just:
> > > if (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)) ?
> >   And BTW, since FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE does not change the file size, should
> > not we enforce that FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE is / is not set? I don't mind too
> > much which way but keeping it ambiguous (ignored) in the interface usually
> > proves as a bad idea in future when we want to further extend the interface...
> >
> 
> Yeah I went back and forth on this.  KEEP_SIZE won't change the behavior of
> PUNCH_HOLE since PUNCH_HOLE implicitly means keep the size.  I figured since its
> "mode" and not "flags" it would be ok to make either way accepted, but if you
> prefer PUNCH_HOLE means you have to have KEEP_SIZE set then I'm cool with that,
> just let me know one way or the other.  Thanks,
  I was wondering about 'mode' vs 'flags' as well. The manpage says:
The mode argument determines the operation to be performed on the given
range.  Currently only one flag is supported for mode...
  So we call it "mode" but speak about "flags"? Seems a bit inconsistent.
I'd maybe lean a bit at the "flags" side and just make sure that
only one of FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE is set (interpreting
FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE as allocate blocks beyond i_size). But I'm not sure
what others think.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR



  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-16 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 151+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-15 17:05 Hole Punching V2 Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:14 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05 ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05 ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] fs: add hole punching to fallocate Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:14   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 11:16   ` Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:16     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:16     ` [Cluster-devel] " Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:16     ` Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:43     ` Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:43       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:43       ` [Cluster-devel] " Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:43       ` Jan Kara
2010-11-16 12:52       ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 12:53         ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 12:52         ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 13:14         ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-11-16 13:14           ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jan Kara
2010-11-16 13:14           ` [Cluster-devel] " Jan Kara
2010-11-16 13:14           ` Jan Kara
2010-11-17  0:22           ` Andreas Dilger
2010-11-17  0:22             ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2010-11-17  0:22             ` Andreas Dilger
2010-11-17  2:11             ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-17  2:12               ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dave Chinner
2010-11-17  2:11               ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-17  2:28               ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  2:29                 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  2:28                 ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  2:34                 ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  2:35                   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  2:34                   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  9:30                   ` Andreas Dilger
2010-11-17  9:30                     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2010-11-17  9:30                     ` Andreas Dilger
2010-11-17  9:19               ` Andreas Dilger
2010-11-17  9:19                 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2010-11-17  9:19                 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-11-16 12:53     ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 12:54       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 12:53       ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] XFS: handle hole punching via fallocate properly Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:14   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] Ocfs2: " Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:14   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 11:50   ` Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:50     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:50     ` [Cluster-devel] " Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:50     ` Jan Kara
2010-11-17 23:27   ` Joel Becker
2010-11-17 23:28     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2010-11-17 23:27     ` [Cluster-devel] " Joel Becker
2010-11-17 23:27     ` Joel Becker
2010-11-15 17:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] Ext4: fail if we try to use hole punch Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:14   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 11:52   ` Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:52     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:52     ` [Cluster-devel] " Jan Kara
2010-11-16 11:52     ` Jan Kara
2010-11-16 12:25   ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-16 12:25     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-11-16 12:25     ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-16 12:50     ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 12:50       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 12:50       ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 13:07       ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-16 13:07         ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-11-16 13:07         ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-16 16:05         ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 16:06           ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 16:05           ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 20:47           ` Greg Freemyer
2010-11-16 20:47             ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Greg Freemyer
2010-11-16 20:47             ` Greg Freemyer
2010-11-16 20:47             ` Greg Freemyer
2010-11-16 20:47             ` Greg Freemyer
2010-11-17  3:06         ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-17  3:06           ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Ted Ts'o
2010-11-17  3:06           ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-17  6:31           ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  6:32             ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  6:31             ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  6:31             ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-17  6:31           ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 16:20   ` Pádraig Brady
2010-11-16 16:21     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Pádraig Brady
2010-11-16 16:20     ` Pádraig Brady
2010-11-16 16:20     ` Pádraig Brady
2010-11-16 16:33     ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 16:33       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 16:33       ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 16:33       ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-16 16:56       ` Pádraig Brady
2010-11-15 17:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] Btrfs: " Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:14   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] Gfs2: " Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:14   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-15 17:05   ` Josef Bacik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-18  1:46 Hole Punching V3 Josef Bacik
2010-11-18  1:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] fs: add hole punching to fallocate Josef Bacik
2010-11-18  1:46   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-18  1:46   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-18 23:43   ` Jan Kara
2010-11-18 23:43     ` Jan Kara
2010-11-08 20:32 Josef Bacik
2010-11-08 20:32 ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-08 20:32 ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-09  1:12 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09  1:12   ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09  2:10   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-09  2:10     ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-09  3:30   ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-09  3:30     ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-09  4:42     ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09  4:42       ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09  4:42       ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09 21:41       ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-09 21:41         ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-09 21:53         ` Jan Kara
2010-11-09 21:53           ` Jan Kara
2010-11-09 23:40         ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09 23:40           ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09 23:40           ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09 23:40           ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-11 21:13           ` Lawrence Greenfield
2011-01-11 21:13             ` Lawrence Greenfield
2011-01-11 21:13             ` Lawrence Greenfield
2011-01-11 21:13             ` Lawrence Greenfield
2011-01-11 21:30             ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-11 21:30               ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-12 11:48               ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-12 11:48               ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-12 11:48                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-12 11:48                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-12 12:44             ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-12 12:44               ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 18:13               ` Ric Wheeler
2011-01-28 18:13                 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-11-09 20:51   ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-09 20:51     ` Josef Bacik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101116131451.GH4757@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.