From: "Nadav Har'El" <nyh@math.technion.ac.il>
To: Juerg Haefliger <juergh@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/29] nVMX: Nested VMX, v8
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:07:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110131100704.GC23022@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTintP8tTk=XpbM6E+DwhYt=CEmKq87mM_o41My6E@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011, Juerg Haefliger wrote about "Re: [PATCH 0/29] nVMX: Nested VMX, v8":
> This branch doesn't even compile:
>...
> CC [M] drivers/staging/smbfs/dir.o
> drivers/staging/smbfs/dir.c:286: error: static declaration of
I tried to compile this branch with the default .config (answering the
defaults to every question in "make config"), and it compiled without
any error.
However, the default configuration is *not* to compile the code you had
problems in, drivers/staging/smbfs, because by default CONFIG_STAGING is off.
When I went to enable CONFIG_STAGING and then SMB_FS, I was given a big
warning that smbfs is "OBSOLETE, please use CIFS". Is there a specific reason
why you want to use smbfs, not cifs?
Anyway, when I did enable SMB_FS, and compiled, sure enought I got the
same error that you did. This definitely has nothing to do with the
nested VMX patches. If smbfs isn't essential to you, please try again
without it (turn off SMB_FS in your .config). If it is, maybe you should
report this problem to the smbfs maintainers?
Thanks,
Nadav.
--
Nadav Har'El | Monday, Jan 31 2011, 26 Shevat 5771
nyh@math.technion.ac.il |-----------------------------------------
Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |This box was intentionally left blank.
http://nadav.harel.org.il |
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-31 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-27 8:29 [PATCH 0/29] nVMX: Nested VMX, v8 Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:30 ` [PATCH 01/29] nVMX: Add "nested" module option to vmx.c Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:30 ` [PATCH 02/29] nVMX: Implement VMXON and VMXOFF Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:31 ` [PATCH 03/29] nVMX: Allow setting the VMXE bit in CR4 Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:31 ` [PATCH 04/29] nVMX: Introduce vmcs12: a VMCS structure for L1 Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:32 ` [PATCH 05/29] nVMX: Implement reading and writing of VMX MSRs Nadav Har'El
2011-01-30 9:52 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-31 8:57 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-01-31 9:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-27 8:32 ` [PATCH 06/29] nVMX: Decoding memory operands of VMX instructions Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:33 ` [PATCH 07/29] nVMX: Hold a vmcs02 for each vmcs12 Nadav Har'El
2011-01-30 10:02 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-31 9:26 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-01-31 9:41 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-03 12:57 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-02-06 9:16 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-13 13:04 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-02-13 14:58 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-13 20:07 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:33 ` [PATCH 08/29] nVMX: Fix local_vcpus_link handling Nadav Har'El
2011-01-30 10:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-27 8:34 ` [PATCH 09/29] nVMX: Add VMCS fields to the vmcs12 Nadav Har'El
2011-01-30 10:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-27 8:34 ` [PATCH 10/29] nVMX: Success/failure of VMX instructions Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:35 ` [PATCH 11/29] nVMX: Implement VMCLEAR Nadav Har'El
2011-01-30 12:07 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-27 8:35 ` [PATCH 12/29] nVMX: Implement VMPTRLD Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:36 ` [PATCH 13/29] nVMX: Implement VMPTRST Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:37 ` [PATCH 14/29] nVMX: Implement VMREAD and VMWRITE Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:37 ` [PATCH 15/29] nVMX: Prepare vmcs02 from vmcs01 and vmcs12 Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:38 ` [PATCH 16/29] nVMX: Move register-syncing to a function Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:38 ` [PATCH 17/29] nVMX: Implement VMLAUNCH and VMRESUME Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:39 ` [PATCH 18/29] nVMX: No need for handle_vmx_insn function any more Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:39 ` [PATCH 19/29] nVMX: Exiting from L2 to L1 Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:40 ` [PATCH 20/29] nVMX: Deciding if L0 or L1 should handle an L2 exit Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:40 ` [PATCH 21/29] nVMX: Correct handling of interrupt injection Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:41 ` [PATCH 22/29] nVMX: Correct handling of exception injection Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:41 ` [PATCH 23/29] nVMX: Correct handling of idt vectoring info Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:42 ` [PATCH 24/29] nVMX: Handling of CR0 and CR4 modifying instructions Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:42 ` [PATCH 25/29] nVMX: Further fixes for lazy FPU loading Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:43 ` [PATCH 26/29] nVMX: Additional TSC-offset handling Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:43 ` [PATCH 27/29] nVMX: Add VMX to list of supported cpuid features Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:44 ` [PATCH 28/29] nVMX: Miscellenous small corrections Nadav Har'El
2011-01-27 8:44 ` [PATCH 29/29] nVMX: Documentation Nadav Har'El
2011-01-28 8:41 ` [PATCH 0/29] nVMX: Nested VMX, v8 Juerg Haefliger
2011-01-28 17:16 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-01-31 10:07 ` Nadav Har'El [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110131100704.GC23022@fermat.math.technion.ac.il \
--to=nyh@math.technion.ac.il \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=juergh@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.