All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Eibach, Dirk" <Eibach@gdsys.de>
Cc: "Guenter Roeck" <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: Consider LM64 temperature offset
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:09:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110208170951.2cc64a62@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D3D52125C49B43AE880038E2E5314BB5BE41@SRV101.gdsys.de>

Hi Dirk,

On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:54:52 +0100, Eibach, Dirk wrote:
> 
> Dear Guenter, 
> 
> > Chip id is already detected in lm63_detect. You don't need to 
> > detect it again.
> > The more common approach would be something along the line of
> > 	data->kind = id->driver_data;
> >     You would then use
> > 	if (data->kind == lm64)
> >     throughout the code. In addition to that, you could define
> > 	data->kind = id->driver_data;
> > 	if (data->kind == lm64)
> > 		data->offset = 16000;
> >     which would save you the repeated recalculation of offset 
> > as mentioned before.
> 
> I don't understand, what structures "data" and "id" you are referring to

data is struct lm63_data and id is const struct i2c_device_id which is
passed as a second parameter to the probe function.

> here and where the fields driver_data and kind come from. I remember to
> have seen such in older kernels, but wasn't that replaced sometime ago?

There were indeed some changes in this area in the past few years, but
what Guenter says still applies to current kernels. Look at lm90_probe()
in drivers/hwmon/lm90.c for an example (amongst may others.)

-- 
Jean Delvare

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Eibach, Dirk" <Eibach@gdsys.de>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: Consider LM64 temperature offset
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:09:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110208170951.2cc64a62@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D3D52125C49B43AE880038E2E5314BB5BE41@SRV101.gdsys.de>

Hi Dirk,

On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:54:52 +0100, Eibach, Dirk wrote:
> 
> Dear Guenter, 
> 
> > Chip id is already detected in lm63_detect. You don't need to 
> > detect it again.
> > The more common approach would be something along the line of
> > 	data->kind = id->driver_data;
> >     You would then use
> > 	if (data->kind = lm64)
> >     throughout the code. In addition to that, you could define
> > 	data->kind = id->driver_data;
> > 	if (data->kind = lm64)
> > 		data->offset = 16000;
> >     which would save you the repeated recalculation of offset 
> > as mentioned before.
> 
> I don't understand, what structures "data" and "id" you are referring to

data is struct lm63_data and id is const struct i2c_device_id which is
passed as a second parameter to the probe function.

> here and where the fields driver_data and kind come from. I remember to
> have seen such in older kernels, but wasn't that replaced sometime ago?

There were indeed some changes in this area in the past few years, but
what Guenter says still applies to current kernels. Look at lm90_probe()
in drivers/hwmon/lm90.c for an example (amongst may others.)

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-08 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-08 13:16 [PATCH] hwmon: Consider LM64 temperature offset Dirk Eibach
2011-02-08 13:16 ` [lm-sensors] " Dirk Eibach
2011-02-08 15:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-02-08 15:28   ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2011-02-08 15:54   ` Eibach, Dirk
2011-02-08 15:54     ` [lm-sensors] " Eibach, Dirk
2011-02-08 16:07     ` Guenter Roeck
2011-02-08 16:07       ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2011-02-08 16:09     ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2011-02-08 16:09       ` Jean Delvare
2011-02-09  9:51   ` [PATCH v2] " Dirk Eibach
2011-02-09  9:51     ` [lm-sensors] " Dirk Eibach
2011-02-09 18:17     ` Guenter Roeck
2011-02-09 18:17       ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110208170951.2cc64a62@endymion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=Eibach@gdsys.de \
    --cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.