All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: cmetcalf@tilera.com
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	aarcange@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, riel@redhat.com,
	mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk, mel@csn.ul.ie, npiggin@kernel.dk,
	rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] mm: Change flush_tlb_range() to take an mm_struct
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:45:42 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110303.104542.104052570.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D6FCE5D.4030904@tilera.com>

From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:22:37 -0500

> I'm finding it hard to understand how the Sparc code handles icache
> coherence.  It seems that the Spitfire MMU is the interesting one, but the
> hard case seems to be when a process migrates around to various cores
> during execution (thus leaving incoherent icache lines everywhere), and the
> page is then freed and re-used for different executable code.  I'd think
> that there would have to be xcall IPIs to flush all the cpus' icaches, or
> to flush every core in the cpu_vm_mask plus do something at context switch,
> but I don't see any of that.  No doubt I'm missing something :-)

flush_dcache_page() remembers the cpu that wrote to the page (in the
page flags), and cross-calls to that specific cpu.

It is only that cpu which must flush his I-cache, since all other cpus
saw the write on the bus and updated their I-cache lines as a result.

See, in the sparc64 case, the incoherency issue is purely local to the
store.  The problem case is specifically the local I-cache not seeing
local writes, everything else is fine.  CPU I-caches see writes done
by other cpus, just not those done by the local cpu.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: cmetcalf@tilera.com
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	aarcange@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, riel@redhat.com,
	mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk, mel@csn.ul.ie, npiggin@kernel.dk,
	rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] mm: Change flush_tlb_range() to take an mm_struct
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:45:42 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110303.104542.104052570.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D6FCE5D.4030904@tilera.com>

From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:22:37 -0500

> I'm finding it hard to understand how the Sparc code handles icache
> coherence.  It seems that the Spitfire MMU is the interesting one, but the
> hard case seems to be when a process migrates around to various cores
> during execution (thus leaving incoherent icache lines everywhere), and the
> page is then freed and re-used for different executable code.  I'd think
> that there would have to be xcall IPIs to flush all the cpus' icaches, or
> to flush every core in the cpu_vm_mask plus do something at context switch,
> but I don't see any of that.  No doubt I'm missing something :-)

flush_dcache_page() remembers the cpu that wrote to the page (in the
page flags), and cross-calls to that specific cpu.

It is only that cpu which must flush his I-cache, since all other cpus
saw the write on the bus and updated their I-cache lines as a result.

See, in the sparc64 case, the incoherency issue is purely local to the
store.  The problem case is specifically the local I-cache not seeing
local writes, everything else is fine.  CPU I-caches see writes done
by other cpus, just not those done by the local cpu.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-03 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-02 17:59 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] mm: Unify TLB gather implementations Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] mm: Optimize fullmm TLB flushing Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] mm: Change flush_tlb_range() to take an mm_struct Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 19:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-02 19:19     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-02 20:58     ` Rik van Riel
2011-03-02 20:58       ` Rik van Riel
2011-03-02 21:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 21:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 21:47       ` David Miller
2011-03-02 21:47         ` David Miller
2011-03-03 17:22         ` Chris Metcalf
2011-03-03 17:22           ` Chris Metcalf
2011-03-03 17:22           ` Chris Metcalf
2011-03-03 18:45           ` David Miller [this message]
2011-03-03 18:45             ` David Miller
2011-03-03 18:56             ` Chris Metcalf
2011-03-03 18:56               ` Chris Metcalf
2011-03-03 18:56               ` Chris Metcalf
2011-03-10 18:05           ` [PATCH] arch/tile: optimize icache flush Chris Metcalf
2011-03-10 18:05             ` Chris Metcalf
2011-03-10 18:05             ` Chris Metcalf
2011-03-10 23:19             ` Rik van Riel
2011-03-10 23:19               ` Rik van Riel
2011-03-02 17:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] mm: Provide generic range tracking and flushing Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] arm, mm: Convert arm to generic tlb Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-09 15:16   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-03-09 15:16     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-03-09 15:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-09 15:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-09 15:36       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-03-09 15:36         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-03-09 15:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-09 15:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-09 15:48           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-09 15:48             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-09 16:34             ` Catalin Marinas
2011-03-09 16:34               ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17  3:05   ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-17  3:05     ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-17  9:30     ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17  9:30       ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17  9:39       ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17  9:39         ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17  9:51       ` Russell King
2012-05-17  9:51         ` Russell King
2012-05-17 11:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 11:28           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 12:14           ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17 12:14             ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17 16:00           ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17 16:00             ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17 16:24             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 16:24               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 16:33               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 16:33                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 16:44                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 16:44                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 16:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 16:59                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 17:01                   ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17 17:01                     ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17 17:11                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 17:11                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-21  7:47               ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-05-21  7:47                 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-05-17 17:22             ` Russell King
2012-05-17 17:22               ` Russell King
2012-05-17 18:31               ` Catalin Marinas
2012-05-17 18:31                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-03-02 17:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] ia64, mm: Convert ia64 " Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] sh, mm: Convert sh " Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:59   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110303.104542.104052570.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.