All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc3, 2.6.39-rc4: XFS lockup - regression since 2.6.38
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:08:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110427050850.GG12436@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110423224403.5fd1136a@neptune.home>

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:44:03PM +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Running 2.6.39-rc3+ and now again on 2.6.39-rc4+ (I've not tested -rc1
> or -rc2) I've hit a "dying machine" where processes writing to disk end
> up in D state.
> From occurrence with -rc3+ I don't have logs as those never hit the disk,
> for -rc4+ I have the following (sysrq+t was too big, what I have of it
> misses a dozen of kernel tasks - if needed, please ask):
> 
> The -rc4 kernel is at commit 584f79046780e10cb24367a691f8c28398a00e84
> (+ 1 patch of mine to stop disk on reboot),
> full dmesg available if needed; kernel config attached (only selected
> options). In case there is something I should do at next occurrence
> please tell. Unfortunately I have no trigger for it and it does not
> happen very often.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bruno
> 
> [    0.000000] Linux version 2.6.39-rc4-00120-g73b5b55 (kbuild@neptune) (gcc version 4.4.5 (Gentoo 4.4.5 p1.2, pie-0.4.5) ) #12 Thu Apr 21 19:28:45 CEST 2011
> 
> 
> [32040.120055] INFO: task flush-8:0:1665 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> [32040.120068] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [32040.120077] flush-8:0       D 00000000  4908  1665      2 0x00000000
> [32040.120099]  f55efb5c 00000046 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 e0382924 00000000
> [32040.120118]  f55efb0c f55efb5c 00000004 f629ba70 572f01a2 00001cfe f629ba70 ffffffc0
> [32040.120135]  f55efc68 f55efb30 f889d7f8 f55efb20 00000000 f55efc68 e0382900 f55efc94
> [32040.120153] Call Trace:
> [32040.120220]  [<f889d7f8>] ? xfs_bmap_search_multi_extents+0x88/0xe0 [xfs]
> [32040.120239]  [<c109ce1d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x2d/0x110
> [32040.120294]  [<f88c88ca>] ? xlog_space_left+0x2a/0xc0 [xfs]
> [32040.120346]  [<f88c85cb>] xlog_wait+0x4b/0x70 [xfs]
> [32040.120359]  [<c102ca00>] ? try_to_wake_up+0xc0/0xc0
> [32040.120411]  [<f88c948b>] xlog_grant_log_space+0x8b/0x240 [xfs]
> [32040.120464]  [<f88c936e>] ? xlog_grant_push_ail+0xbe/0xf0 [xfs]
> [32040.120516]  [<f88c99db>] xfs_log_reserve+0xab/0xb0 [xfs]
> [32040.120571]  [<f88d6dc8>] xfs_trans_reserve+0x78/0x1f0 [xfs]

Hmmmmm. That may be caused by the conversion of the xfsaild to a
work queue. Can you post the output of "xfs_info <mntpt>" and the
mount options (/proc/mounts) used on you system?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc3, 2.6.39-rc4: XFS lockup - regression since 2.6.38
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:08:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110427050850.GG12436@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110423224403.5fd1136a@neptune.home>

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:44:03PM +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Running 2.6.39-rc3+ and now again on 2.6.39-rc4+ (I've not tested -rc1
> or -rc2) I've hit a "dying machine" where processes writing to disk end
> up in D state.
> From occurrence with -rc3+ I don't have logs as those never hit the disk,
> for -rc4+ I have the following (sysrq+t was too big, what I have of it
> misses a dozen of kernel tasks - if needed, please ask):
> 
> The -rc4 kernel is at commit 584f79046780e10cb24367a691f8c28398a00e84
> (+ 1 patch of mine to stop disk on reboot),
> full dmesg available if needed; kernel config attached (only selected
> options). In case there is something I should do at next occurrence
> please tell. Unfortunately I have no trigger for it and it does not
> happen very often.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bruno
> 
> [    0.000000] Linux version 2.6.39-rc4-00120-g73b5b55 (kbuild@neptune) (gcc version 4.4.5 (Gentoo 4.4.5 p1.2, pie-0.4.5) ) #12 Thu Apr 21 19:28:45 CEST 2011
> 
> 
> [32040.120055] INFO: task flush-8:0:1665 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> [32040.120068] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [32040.120077] flush-8:0       D 00000000  4908  1665      2 0x00000000
> [32040.120099]  f55efb5c 00000046 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 e0382924 00000000
> [32040.120118]  f55efb0c f55efb5c 00000004 f629ba70 572f01a2 00001cfe f629ba70 ffffffc0
> [32040.120135]  f55efc68 f55efb30 f889d7f8 f55efb20 00000000 f55efc68 e0382900 f55efc94
> [32040.120153] Call Trace:
> [32040.120220]  [<f889d7f8>] ? xfs_bmap_search_multi_extents+0x88/0xe0 [xfs]
> [32040.120239]  [<c109ce1d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x2d/0x110
> [32040.120294]  [<f88c88ca>] ? xlog_space_left+0x2a/0xc0 [xfs]
> [32040.120346]  [<f88c85cb>] xlog_wait+0x4b/0x70 [xfs]
> [32040.120359]  [<c102ca00>] ? try_to_wake_up+0xc0/0xc0
> [32040.120411]  [<f88c948b>] xlog_grant_log_space+0x8b/0x240 [xfs]
> [32040.120464]  [<f88c936e>] ? xlog_grant_push_ail+0xbe/0xf0 [xfs]
> [32040.120516]  [<f88c99db>] xfs_log_reserve+0xab/0xb0 [xfs]
> [32040.120571]  [<f88d6dc8>] xfs_trans_reserve+0x78/0x1f0 [xfs]

Hmmmmm. That may be caused by the conversion of the xfsaild to a
work queue. Can you post the output of "xfs_info <mntpt>" and the
mount options (/proc/mounts) used on you system?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-27  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-23 20:44 2.6.39-rc3, 2.6.39-rc4: XFS lockup - regression since 2.6.38 Bruno Prémont
2011-04-23 20:44 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27  5:08 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-04-27  5:08   ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-27 16:26   ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 16:26     ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28 19:45     ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-28 19:45       ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-29  1:19       ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-29  1:19         ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-29 15:18         ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-29 15:18           ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-29 19:35           ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-29 19:35             ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-30 14:18             ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-30 14:18               ` Bruno Prémont
2011-05-02  6:15               ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-05-02  6:15                 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-05-02 12:40                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-02 12:40                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-04  0:57         ` Jamie Heilman
2011-05-04  0:57           ` Jamie Heilman
2011-05-04 13:25           ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-04 13:25             ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-05  0:21           ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-05  0:21             ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-05  2:26             ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-05  2:26               ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-05 12:21               ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-05 12:21                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-05 12:39                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-05 12:39                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-06  1:49                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-06  1:49                     ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-05 20:35                 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-05-05 20:35                   ` Bruno Prémont
2011-05-09  5:57                   ` Bruno Prémont
2011-05-09  5:57                     ` Bruno Prémont
2011-05-08  5:11                 ` Jamie Heilman
2011-05-08  5:11                   ` Jamie Heilman
2011-05-20 11:20         ` Andrey Rahmatullin
2011-05-20 11:20           ` Andrey Rahmatullin
2011-05-21  0:14           ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-21  0:14             ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110427050850.GG12436@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.