Re: 2.6.39-rc3, 2.6.39-rc4: XFS lockup - regression since 2.6.38

From: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
	xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc3, 2.6.39-rc4: XFS lockup - regression since 2.6.38
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:35:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110505223513.3654c041@neptune.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110505122117.GB26837@dastard>

On Thu, 05 May 2011 Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:26:13PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:21:26AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:57:36AM +0000, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> > > > Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > > OK, so the common elements here appears to be root filesystems
> > > > > with small log sizes, which means they are tail pushing all the
> > > > > time metadata operations are in progress. Definitely seems like a
> > > > > race in the AIL workqueue trigger mechanism. I'll see if I can
> > > > > reproduce this and cook up a patch to fix it.
> > > > 
> > > > Is there value in continuing to post sysrq-w, sysrq-l, xfs_info, and
> > > > other assorted feedback wrt this issue?  I've had it happen twice now
> > > > myself in the past week or so, though I have no reliable reproduction
> > > > technique.  Just wondering if more data points will help isolate the
> > > > cause, and if so, how to be prepared to get them.
> > > > 
> > > > For whatever its worth, my last lockup was while running
> > > > 2.6.39-rc5-00127-g1be6a1f with a preempt config without cgroups.
> > > 
> > > Can you all try the patch below? I've managed to trigger a couple of
> > > xlog_wait() lockups in some controlled load tests. The lockups don't
> > > appear to occur with the following patch to he race condition in
> > > the AIL workqueue trigger.
> > 
> > They are still there, just harder to hit.
> > 
> > FWIW, I've also discovered that "echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches"
> > gets the system moving again because that changes the push target.
> > 
> > I've found two more bugs, and now my test case is now reliably
> > reproducably a 5-10s pause at ~1M created 1byte files and then
> > hanging at about 1.25M files. So there's yet another problem lurking
> > that I need to get to the bottom of.
> 
> Which, of course, was the real regression. The patch below has
> survived a couple of hours of testing, which fixes all 4 of the
> problems I found. Please test.

Successfully survives my 2-hours session of today. Will continue testing
during week-end and see if it also survives the longer whole-day sessions.

Will report results at end of week-end (or earlier in case of trouble).

Thanks,
Bruno

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.