* Re: LPC2011 Power Management Micro Conf
2011-07-03 7:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-12 3:32 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-12 3:32 ` Mark Brown
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2011-08-12 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: tytso, Arnd Bergmann, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Stephen Boyd, LKML,
Grant Likely, MyungJoo Ham, linux-pm, Jean Pihet,
Arjan van de Ven
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 09:29:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> If there's anything you'd like to discuss or give a presentation on related to
> Power Management, please let me know, preferably by replying to this message.
The issue of cross-bus sequencing within suspend has come up again - we
really need to work out how we make sure that dependencies between
devices that aren't accounted for in the control bus sorting we do as
standard. This may be worth bringing up a KS also as it's device model
related.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: LPC2011 Power Management Micro Conf
2011-07-03 7:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-12 3:32 ` Mark Brown
@ 2011-08-12 3:32 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-12 7:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-12 7:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-30 22:39 ` [Update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-30 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
3 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2011-08-12 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: linux-pm, Arnd Bergmann, Stephen Boyd, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
Grant Likely, Arjan van de Ven, Kevin Hilman, Magnus Damm,
Matthew Garrett, Paul Walmsley, LKML, Jean Pihet, Alan Stern,
MyungJoo Ham, Len Brown, tytso
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 09:29:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> If there's anything you'd like to discuss or give a presentation on related to
> Power Management, please let me know, preferably by replying to this message.
The issue of cross-bus sequencing within suspend has come up again - we
really need to work out how we make sure that dependencies between
devices that aren't accounted for in the control bus sorting we do as
standard. This may be worth bringing up a KS also as it's device model
related.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: LPC2011 Power Management Micro Conf
2011-08-12 3:32 ` Mark Brown
@ 2011-08-12 7:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-12 7:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-12 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: tytso, Arnd Bergmann, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Stephen Boyd, LKML,
Grant Likely, MyungJoo Ham, linux-pm, Jean Pihet,
Arjan van de Ven
On Friday, August 12, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 09:29:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > If there's anything you'd like to discuss or give a presentation on related to
> > Power Management, please let me know, preferably by replying to this message.
>
> The issue of cross-bus sequencing within suspend has come up again - we
> really need to work out how we make sure that dependencies between
> devices that aren't accounted for in the control bus sorting we do as
> standard. This may be worth bringing up a KS also as it's device model
> related.
I agree, I'll add it to the agenda of the LPC microconf.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: LPC2011 Power Management Micro Conf
2011-08-12 3:32 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-12 7:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-12 7:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-12 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: linux-pm, Arnd Bergmann, Stephen Boyd, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
Grant Likely, Arjan van de Ven, Kevin Hilman, Magnus Damm,
Matthew Garrett, Paul Walmsley, LKML, Jean Pihet, Alan Stern,
MyungJoo Ham, Len Brown, tytso
On Friday, August 12, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 09:29:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > If there's anything you'd like to discuss or give a presentation on related to
> > Power Management, please let me know, preferably by replying to this message.
>
> The issue of cross-bus sequencing within suspend has come up again - we
> really need to work out how we make sure that dependencies between
> devices that aren't accounted for in the control bus sorting we do as
> standard. This may be worth bringing up a KS also as it's device model
> related.
I agree, I'll add it to the agenda of the LPC microconf.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Update] LPC2011 Power Management Micro Conf
2011-07-03 7:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-12 3:32 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-12 3:32 ` Mark Brown
@ 2011-08-30 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-30 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-30 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-pm
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Stephen Boyd, LKML,
Grant Likely, MyungJoo Ham, Jean Pihet, Arjan van de Ven
Hi,
On Sunday, July 03, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago I sent the following to linux-pm and wasn't really satisfied
> with the response, so here it goes again. It is slightly outdated, because
> we've already started to plan a PM meeting at the Kernel Summit, but I hope
> some of you will be able to participate in the LPC PM Mini Conf too.
>
> In the previous years we used to organize Power Management Mini Summits to
> discuss PM-related issues, the last of which took place during LinuxCon in
> Boston in 2010. Unfortunately, however, it wasn't particularly well attended
> and some of the participants generally felt that it had failed its purpose.
> The power management track at the last LPC, on the other hand, was generally
> regarded as interesting and successful, so there only seems to be room for
> one event devoted to power management a year. For this reason, there won't
> be a PM Mini Summit in 2011 and the LPC PM Mini Conference will play the role
> of it. To this end, in addition to the plenary sessions within the LPC PM
> track there will be a possibility to discuss specific problems related to
> power management in smaller groups.
>
> If there's anything you'd like to discuss or give a presentation on related to
> Power Management, please let me know, preferably by replying to this message.
>
> We have 1.5 hours allocated in the LPC schedule for the plenary session, but
> we will be able to move to another room (or a number of rooms if that's more
> suitable) afterwards to discuss things in detail.
The LPC planned schedule has recently changed so that the PM microconference
is now scheduled on Thursday, Sep. 8, 2011, at 4:45 PM. Since the LPC
organizers have no plans for Thursday evening, we can easily extend the
discussion part pretty much as far as we want.
Please review the updated agenda at
http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2011:power_management
and adjust your plans. Sorry for the inconveniences, if any.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Update] LPC2011 Power Management Micro Conf
2011-07-03 7:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-30 22:39 ` [Update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-30 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-30 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-pm
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Stephen Boyd, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Grant Likely,
Arjan van de Ven, Kevin Hilman, Magnus Damm, Matthew Garrett,
Paul Walmsley, LKML, Jean Pihet, Alan Stern, MyungJoo Ham,
Len Brown, Mark Brown
Hi,
On Sunday, July 03, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago I sent the following to linux-pm and wasn't really satisfied
> with the response, so here it goes again. It is slightly outdated, because
> we've already started to plan a PM meeting at the Kernel Summit, but I hope
> some of you will be able to participate in the LPC PM Mini Conf too.
>
> In the previous years we used to organize Power Management Mini Summits to
> discuss PM-related issues, the last of which took place during LinuxCon in
> Boston in 2010. Unfortunately, however, it wasn't particularly well attended
> and some of the participants generally felt that it had failed its purpose.
> The power management track at the last LPC, on the other hand, was generally
> regarded as interesting and successful, so there only seems to be room for
> one event devoted to power management a year. For this reason, there won't
> be a PM Mini Summit in 2011 and the LPC PM Mini Conference will play the role
> of it. To this end, in addition to the plenary sessions within the LPC PM
> track there will be a possibility to discuss specific problems related to
> power management in smaller groups.
>
> If there's anything you'd like to discuss or give a presentation on related to
> Power Management, please let me know, preferably by replying to this message.
>
> We have 1.5 hours allocated in the LPC schedule for the plenary session, but
> we will be able to move to another room (or a number of rooms if that's more
> suitable) afterwards to discuss things in detail.
The LPC planned schedule has recently changed so that the PM microconference
is now scheduled on Thursday, Sep. 8, 2011, at 4:45 PM. Since the LPC
organizers have no plans for Thursday evening, we can easily extend the
discussion part pretty much as far as we want.
Please review the updated agenda at
http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2011:power_management
and adjust your plans. Sorry for the inconveniences, if any.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread