From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH 6/10] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:39:50 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <201107112139.50503.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87oc10zv4g.fsf@ti.com> On Monday, July 11, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes: > > [...] > > > > > There's one more case to consider, namely devices that are runtime > > suspended, set up to wake up the system from sleep states > > (ie. device_may_wakeup(dev) returns "true") and such that > > genpd->active_wakeup(dev) returns "true" for them, because they need > > to be resumed at this point too (arguably, it makes a little sense to > > runtime suspend such devices, but that's possible in principle). > > > > So, IMO, the patch should look like this: > > > > --- > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > > > >> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > =================================> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > @@ -486,6 +486,22 @@ static void pm_genpd_sync_poweroff(struc > > } > > > > /** > > + * resume_needed - Check whether to resume a device before system suspend. > > + * @dev: Device to handle. > > + * @genpd: PM domain the device belongs to. > > + */ > > +static bool resume_needed(struct device *dev, struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > +{ > > + bool active_wakeup; > > + > > + if (!device_can_wakeup(dev)) > > + return false; > > + > > + active_wakeup = genpd->active_wakeup && genpd->active_wakeup(dev); > > + return device_may_wakeup(dev) ? active_wakeup : !active_wakeup; > > This also returns true and causes a resume if active_wakeup = false and > device_may_wakeup() = false. That doesn't seem right. This is on purpose. :-) If active_wakeup is false, the device may signal remote wakeup while suspended. So, if active_wakeup is false and the device is suspended, we have to assume that the device has been set up to signal remote wakeup for runtime PM (if it is not suspended, attempting to resume it will not have any effect). Now, if device_may_wakeup() returns false in addition to that, we may need to change the device's wakeup settings, so the driver's callbacks should be invoked during suspend, so we're resuming the device (we can't just leave it suspended and then invoke the driver's callbacks in the hope they'll do the right thing). I don't really think we can do anything else without using new device flags. > > +} > > + > > +/** > > * pm_genpd_prepare - Start power transition of a device in a PM domain. > > * @dev: Device to start the transition of. > > * > > @@ -519,6 +535,9 @@ static int pm_genpd_prepare(struct devic > > return -EBUSY; > > } > > > > + if (resume_needed(dev, genpd)) > > + pm_runtime_resume(dev); > > + > > genpd_acquire_lock(genpd); > > > > if (genpd->prepared_count++ = 0) > > IIUC, if a device is runtime suspended when a system suspend happens, > the device will be runtime resumed, but never re-suspended. It will be resuspended by the pm_runtime_idle() in pm_genpd_complete() (added by one of the new patches I've been posting for the last few days). > Should resumes by the PM core be done with a get (and a corresponding > put in .complete())? Not necessarily. :-) Thanks, Rafael
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@suse.de>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH 6/10] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:39:50 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <201107112139.50503.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87oc10zv4g.fsf@ti.com> On Monday, July 11, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes: > > [...] > > > > > There's one more case to consider, namely devices that are runtime > > suspended, set up to wake up the system from sleep states > > (ie. device_may_wakeup(dev) returns "true") and such that > > genpd->active_wakeup(dev) returns "true" for them, because they need > > to be resumed at this point too (arguably, it makes a little sense to > > runtime suspend such devices, but that's possible in principle). > > > > So, IMO, the patch should look like this: > > > > --- > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > > > >> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > @@ -486,6 +486,22 @@ static void pm_genpd_sync_poweroff(struc > > } > > > > /** > > + * resume_needed - Check whether to resume a device before system suspend. > > + * @dev: Device to handle. > > + * @genpd: PM domain the device belongs to. > > + */ > > +static bool resume_needed(struct device *dev, struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > +{ > > + bool active_wakeup; > > + > > + if (!device_can_wakeup(dev)) > > + return false; > > + > > + active_wakeup = genpd->active_wakeup && genpd->active_wakeup(dev); > > + return device_may_wakeup(dev) ? active_wakeup : !active_wakeup; > > This also returns true and causes a resume if active_wakeup = false and > device_may_wakeup() = false. That doesn't seem right. This is on purpose. :-) If active_wakeup is false, the device may signal remote wakeup while suspended. So, if active_wakeup is false and the device is suspended, we have to assume that the device has been set up to signal remote wakeup for runtime PM (if it is not suspended, attempting to resume it will not have any effect). Now, if device_may_wakeup() returns false in addition to that, we may need to change the device's wakeup settings, so the driver's callbacks should be invoked during suspend, so we're resuming the device (we can't just leave it suspended and then invoke the driver's callbacks in the hope they'll do the right thing). I don't really think we can do anything else without using new device flags. > > +} > > + > > +/** > > * pm_genpd_prepare - Start power transition of a device in a PM domain. > > * @dev: Device to start the transition of. > > * > > @@ -519,6 +535,9 @@ static int pm_genpd_prepare(struct devic > > return -EBUSY; > > } > > > > + if (resume_needed(dev, genpd)) > > + pm_runtime_resume(dev); > > + > > genpd_acquire_lock(genpd); > > > > if (genpd->prepared_count++ == 0) > > IIUC, if a device is runtime suspended when a system suspend happens, > the device will be runtime resumed, but never re-suspended. It will be resuspended by the pm_runtime_idle() in pm_genpd_complete() (added by one of the new patches I've been posting for the last few days). > Should resumes by the PM core be done with a get (and a corresponding > put in .complete())? Not necessarily. :-) Thanks, Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 19:39 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 261+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-06-11 20:23 [PATCH 0/8] PM / Domains: Support for generic I/O PM domains (v5) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:25 ` [PATCH 1/8] PM / Domains: Update documentation Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] PM / Domains: Rename struct dev_power_domain to struct dev_pm_domain Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-20 23:37 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-20 23:37 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-20 23:37 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-11 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:27 ` [PATCH 3/8] PM: subsys_data in struct dev_pm_info need not depend on RM_RUNTIME Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:31 ` [PATCH 4/8] PM / Domains: Support for generic I/O PM domains (v5) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-19 22:02 ` [Update][PATCH 4/8] PM / Domains: Support for generic I/O PM domains (v6) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-19 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-19 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-21 17:42 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-21 17:42 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-21 17:42 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-22 0:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 0:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 19:51 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-22 19:51 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-22 19:51 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-22 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 0:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] PM: Introduce generic "noirq" callback routines for subsystems Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] PM / Domains: Move code from under #ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:39 ` [PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic PM domains Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 23:28 ` [Update][PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-19 22:06 ` [Update][PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v3) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-19 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-20 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-20 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-20 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 21:50 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-22 21:50 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-22 21:50 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-22 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 22:18 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-22 22:18 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-22 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-23 13:57 ` [PATCH] PM / Runtime: Update documentation of interactions with system sleep Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-23 13:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-24 18:25 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-24 18:25 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-24 18:25 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-23 13:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 22:22 ` [Update][PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v3) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-22 22:18 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-23 14:19 ` Alan Stern 2011-06-23 14:19 ` [Update][PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support Alan Stern 2011-06-23 14:19 ` [Update][PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v3) Alan Stern 2011-06-23 14:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-23 14:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-23 14:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-23 15:11 ` Alan Stern 2011-06-23 15:11 ` [Update][PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support Alan Stern 2011-06-23 15:11 ` [Update][PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v3) Alan Stern 2011-06-23 17:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-23 17:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-23 17:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-23 18:22 ` Alan Stern 2011-06-23 18:22 ` [Update][PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support Alan Stern 2011-06-23 18:22 ` [Update][PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v3) Alan Stern 2011-06-23 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-23 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-23 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-19 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:39 ` [PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic PM domains Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:40 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM / shmobile: Support for I/O PM domains for SH7372 (v5) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-11 20:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-14 13:12 ` Magnus Damm 2011-06-14 13:12 ` Magnus Damm 2011-06-14 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-14 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-14 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-15 14:17 ` Magnus Damm 2011-06-15 14:17 ` Magnus Damm 2011-06-15 23:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-15 23:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-19 22:07 ` [Update][PATCH 8/8] ARM / shmobile: Support for I/O power domains for SH7372 (v6) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-19 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-20 2:01 ` Paul Mundt 2011-06-20 2:01 ` Paul Mundt 2011-06-20 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-20 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-21 11:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-21 11:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-21 12:47 ` Paul Mundt 2011-06-21 12:47 ` Paul Mundt 2011-06-21 12:47 ` Paul Mundt 2011-06-21 11:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-20 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-20 2:01 ` Paul Mundt 2011-06-19 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-15 23:06 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM / shmobile: Support for I/O PM domains for SH7372 (v5) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-10 11:45 ` Laurent Pinchart 2011-07-10 11:45 ` Laurent Pinchart 2011-07-10 11:45 ` Laurent Pinchart 2011-06-15 14:17 ` Magnus Damm 2011-06-14 13:12 ` Magnus Damm 2011-06-11 20:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] PM / Domains: Support for generic I/O PM domains (v5) Greg KH 2011-06-11 20:57 ` Greg KH 2011-06-11 20:57 ` Greg KH 2011-06-21 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-21 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-21 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-21 11:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-21 11:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-21 11:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-21 14:47 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-21 14:47 ` [PATCH 0/8] PM / Domains: Support for generic I/O PM domains Kevin Hilman 2011-06-21 14:47 ` [PATCH 0/8] PM / Domains: Support for generic I/O PM domains (v5) Kevin Hilman 2011-06-25 21:24 ` [PATCH 0/10 v6] PM / Domains: Support for generic I/O PM domains Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:24 ` [PATCH 1/10 v6] PM / Domains: Rename struct dev_power_domain to struct dev_pm_domain Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:25 ` [PATCH 2/10 v6] PM: subsys_data in struct dev_pm_info need not depend on RM_RUNTIME Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:26 ` [PATCH 3/10 v6] PM / Domains: Support for generic I/O PM domains (v7) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 6:14 ` Ming Lei 2011-06-30 6:14 ` Ming Lei 2011-06-30 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 6:14 ` Ming Lei 2011-07-01 18:11 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-01 18:11 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-01 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 18:11 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-25 21:27 ` [PATCH 4/10 v6] PM: Introduce generic "noirq" callback routines for subsystems (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:27 ` [PATCH 5/10 v6] PM / Domains: Move code from under #ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:28 ` [PATCH 6/10 v6] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-28 23:44 ` [Update][PATCH 6/10] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-28 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-28 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 0:29 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-08 0:29 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-08 9:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 9:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 9:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 14:37 ` [Update][PATCH 6/10] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions Alan Stern 2011-07-08 14:37 ` [Update][PATCH 6/10] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5) Alan Stern 2011-07-08 17:20 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-08 17:20 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-08 17:20 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-08 18:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 18:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 19:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 19:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 19:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-09 14:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-09 14:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-09 14:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-11 15:37 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-11 15:37 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-11 15:37 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-11 19:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message] 2011-07-11 19:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-11 19:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 18:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 17:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 17:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 17:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-08 14:37 ` Alan Stern 2011-07-08 0:29 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-25 21:28 ` [PATCH 6/10 v6] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:29 ` [PATCH 7/10 v6] PM / Domains: Don't stop wakeup devices during system sleep transitions Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-29 23:50 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-29 23:50 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-30 19:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 19:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 19:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 22:42 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-30 22:42 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-30 22:42 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-30 22:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 22:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 22:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 23:14 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-30 23:14 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-30 23:14 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-30 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 0:01 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-01 0:01 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-01 0:01 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-01 0:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 0:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 0:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 14:34 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-01 14:34 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-01 14:34 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-30 23:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 23:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-30 23:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 7/10 v6] PM / Domains: Don't stop wakeup devices during Alan Stern 2011-07-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 7/10 v6] PM / Domains: Don't stop wakeup devices during system sleep transitions Alan Stern 2011-07-01 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 14:45 ` Alan Stern 2011-06-29 23:50 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-25 21:30 ` [PATCH 8/10 v6] PM: Allow the clocks management code to be used during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:30 ` [PATCH 9/10 v6] PM: Rename clock management functions Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:31 ` [PATCH 10/10 v6] ARM / shmobile: Support for I/O power domains for SH7372 (v8) Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-27 4:07 ` [PATCH 10/10 v6] ARM / shmobile: Support for I/O power domains Magnus Damm 2011-06-27 4:07 ` [PATCH 10/10 v6] ARM / shmobile: Support for I/O power domains for SH7372 (v8) Magnus Damm 2011-06-27 4:07 ` Magnus Damm 2011-06-27 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-27 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-27 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-27 23:21 ` [PATCH 10/10 v6] ARM / shmobile: Support for I/O power domains Magnus Damm 2011-06-27 23:21 ` [PATCH 10/10 v6] ARM / shmobile: Support for I/O power domains for SH7372 (v8) Magnus Damm 2011-06-27 23:21 ` Magnus Damm 2011-06-28 10:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-28 10:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-28 10:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-25 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-07-01 18:27 ` [PATCH 0/10 v6] PM / Domains: Support for generic I/O PM domains Kevin Hilman 2011-07-01 18:27 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-07-01 18:27 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-06-25 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=201107112139.50503.rjw@sisk.pl \ --to=rjw@sisk.pl \ --cc=gregkh@suse.de \ --cc=khilman@ti.com \ --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \ --cc=paul@pwsan.com \ --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.