From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Samsung: PWM: Allow to differentiate SoCs based on platform device name.
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:03:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906110311.GM6619@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1660939.8M3FnZsmga@flatron>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 12:41:07PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Thursday 01 of September 2011 at 13:18:32, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Well, now we have three alternatives:
> > - to leave it as is (i.e. changing platform device names)
> > - to use cpu_is_* (does it ever exist for S3C64xx or soc_is_s3c64xx is its equivalent?)
> > - to use soc_is_*
> >
> > Waiting for more comments then.
> >
> Ping.
>
> Should I keep it as is or rather change it to use soc_is_s3c64xx instead?
I don't know what question you're asking (the questions don't make sense
in terms of the quoted context.)
If you're asking whether you should use a cpu_ prefix instead of a soc_
prefix for identifying s3c64xx, then consider the question.
What is the CPU?
What are S3C64xx / OMAP / PXA310 / SA-11x0 / AT91RM9200? CPU or SoC ?
What are Cortex A8/A9 / Xscale / StrongARM / ARM920? CPU or SoC ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-06 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-31 12:33 [PATCH 0/5] Add high resolution generic time support for S3C64xx Tomasz Figa
2011-08-31 12:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Samsung: PWM: Allow to differentiate SoCs based on platform device name Tomasz Figa
2011-08-31 12:44 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-31 13:30 ` Tomasz Figa
2011-09-01 2:26 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-09-01 3:33 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-09-01 11:18 ` Tomasz Figa
2011-09-01 12:32 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-06 10:41 ` Tomasz Figa
2011-09-06 11:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-09-06 11:35 ` Tomasz Figa
2011-09-06 12:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-07 19:01 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-10 9:58 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-08-31 12:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: s3c64xx: Add generic high resolution time support using PWM timers Tomasz Figa
2011-10-10 9:57 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-10-11 13:32 ` Tomasz Figa
2011-10-13 14:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-31 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: Samsung: pwm: Exclude timer 3 on S3C64xx if generic time is enabled Tomasz Figa
2011-08-31 12:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: s3c64xx: Move all machines to s3c64xx_timer Tomasz Figa
2011-08-31 12:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: s3c64xx: Add optional local sched_clock implementation Tomasz Figa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-27 23:32 [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Samsung: PWM: Allow to differentiate SoCs based on platform device name Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110906110311.GM6619@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.