All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Samsung: PWM: Allow to differentiate SoCs based on platform device name.
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:30:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+Ln22Gak4engAmccbodi2PbYH1PwQ1KuACd9thX_8W5Cr544Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110831124432.GF14976@sirena.org.uk>

2011/8/31 Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:34:15PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
>> This patch is a prerequisite to adding generic time support for S3C64xx.
>> It makes possible to differentiate SoCs, required to exclude timers 3 and 4
>> from PWM driver only on S3C64xx.
>
> Now we have the cpu_is_foo() support for Samsung CPUs can we use that
> instead?
>

Well, I thought about it, but I based my patches on latest stable sources and
cpu_is_s3c64xx wasn't there yet. Should I rebase them to Linus' tree?

I'm not yet fully used to submitting patches here, so things like choosing the
base for patches are sometimes a bit confusing to me and I couldn't find any
guide. Should fixes be based on stable tree and new features implemented on
top of current Linus' tree? Could you give me some advice on this?

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-31 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-31 12:33 [PATCH 0/5] Add high resolution generic time support for S3C64xx Tomasz Figa
2011-08-31 12:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Samsung: PWM: Allow to differentiate SoCs based on platform device name Tomasz Figa
2011-08-31 12:44   ` Mark Brown
2011-08-31 13:30     ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2011-09-01  2:26       ` Kukjin Kim
2011-09-01  3:33         ` Kyungmin Park
2011-09-01 11:18           ` Tomasz Figa
2011-09-01 12:32             ` Mark Brown
2011-09-06 10:41             ` Tomasz Figa
2011-09-06 11:03               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-06 11:35                 ` Tomasz Figa
2011-09-06 12:04                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-07 19:01                     ` Mark Brown
2011-10-10  9:58                       ` Kukjin Kim
2011-08-31 12:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: s3c64xx: Add generic high resolution time support using PWM timers Tomasz Figa
2011-10-10  9:57   ` Kukjin Kim
2011-10-11 13:32     ` Tomasz Figa
2011-10-13 14:22   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-31 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: Samsung: pwm: Exclude timer 3 on S3C64xx if generic time is enabled Tomasz Figa
2011-08-31 12:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: s3c64xx: Move all machines to s3c64xx_timer Tomasz Figa
2011-08-31 12:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: s3c64xx: Add optional local sched_clock implementation Tomasz Figa
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-27 23:32 [PATCH 1/5] ARM: Samsung: PWM: Allow to differentiate SoCs based on platform device name Tomasz Figa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+Ln22Gak4engAmccbodi2PbYH1PwQ1KuACd9thX_8W5Cr544Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.