All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
	lost.distance@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix regulator related build fail in magician_defconfig
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:18:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328101852.GE3232@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120328094351.GB22414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 778 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:43:51AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:32:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Yes, that's what you should do.  Calling dev_name() is only possible if
> > you have the struct device and removing the need for the struct device
> > is exactly what we're trying to avoid here.

> So what the hell is happening here to fix the breakage which the
> regulator tree caused in mainline?  From this thread, it looks like
> it's been known about since 8th March which is now twenty days ago,
> and it's still broken.

Yes, please at least apply Paul's patches - honestly, given how old
these boards are and the general lack of activity I'd rather expect that
the only thing anyone's doing with them these days is build tests.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix regulator related build fail in magician_defconfig
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:18:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328101852.GE3232@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120328094351.GB22414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:43:51AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:32:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Yes, that's what you should do.  Calling dev_name() is only possible if
> > you have the struct device and removing the need for the struct device
> > is exactly what we're trying to avoid here.

> So what the hell is happening here to fix the breakage which the
> regulator tree caused in mainline?  From this thread, it looks like
> it's been known about since 8th March which is now twenty days ago,
> and it's still broken.

Yes, please at least apply Paul's patches - honestly, given how old
these boards are and the general lack of activity I'd rather expect that
the only thing anyone's doing with them these days is build tests.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120328/e6126460/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-28 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-06 19:46 [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix regulator related build fail in magician_defconfig Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-06 19:46 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-06 20:01 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-06 20:01   ` Mark Brown
2012-03-06 20:49   ` [PATCH v2] " Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-06 20:49     ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-07  1:46     ` Paul Parsons
2012-03-07  1:46       ` Paul Parsons
2012-03-07 14:46       ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-07 14:46         ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-07 14:57         ` Mark Brown
2012-03-07 14:57           ` Mark Brown
2012-03-08 21:34       ` [PATCH] " Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-08 21:34         ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-09  2:47         ` Paul Parsons
2012-03-09  2:47           ` Paul Parsons
2012-03-14  8:38         ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-14  8:38           ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-14 12:30           ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-14 12:30             ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-14 12:32             ` Mark Brown
2012-03-14 12:32               ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28  9:43               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28  9:43                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28 10:18                 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-03-28 10:18                   ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28 13:36                   ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-28 13:36                     ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-28 17:56                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28 17:56                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28 18:10                     ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28 18:10                       ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120328101852.GE3232@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lost.distance@yahoo.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.