From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@frijolero.org>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: Clarify GPL-Compatible is OK
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 01:28:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120407002828.GG6589@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1333757482-16204-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@frijolero.org>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 05:11:22PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> You do not need to make dual licenses when licenses are compatible
> with each other, and in fact at times this can confuse developers / legal.
> This has been well documented by SFLC through their "Maintaining
> Permissive-Licensed Files in a GPL-Licensed Project: Guidelines for
> Developers" [0] which was inspired by the ambiguity of the MadWifi
> Project's Dual BSD/GPL license tradition. The list of GPL-Compatible
> licenses can be found on the FSF's website [1].
This is obvious crap. Explain to me, please, what makes your "GPL compatible"
different from "GPLv2"; at least that would be honest ("we have relicensed
a copy of BSD/GPL code to GPL alone - the license allows that and any
modifications done here are declared GPL-only, so you can't pull them into
the BSD-licensed variants")
"GPL compatible" is not a license; it's a set of licenses. Incidentally,
belonging to that set is irrelevant to legality of including into the kernel,
since GPLv3 a member and it's *NOT* compatible with the kernel license.
since GPLv3 a member and it's *NOT* compatible with the kernel license.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-07 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-07 0:11 [PATCH] module: Clarify GPL-Compatible is OK Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-07 0:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-04-07 0:28 ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-04-07 0:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-07 0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-07 0:51 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-07 1:02 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-08 12:42 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-07 2:49 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-04-07 3:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-07 21:15 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-04-08 0:52 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-08 14:57 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-08 16:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-08 17:12 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-08 20:23 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-04-07 19:03 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-08 12:49 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-08 22:50 ` Dan Williams
2012-05-07 2:39 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120407002828.GG6589@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mcgrof@frijolero.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.