Re: [PATCH v6 17/17] pwm: Take over maintainership of the PWM subsystem

From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-RM9K5IK7kjKj5M59NBduVrNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Brown
	<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>,
	Ryan Mallon <rmallon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	Colin Cross <ccross-z5hGa2qSFaRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie-Fm38FmjxZ/leoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
	Bernhard Walle <walle-pDveNdigDaDu9UdzE1sIFA@public.gmane.org>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke
	<matthias-RprLehDfhQ3k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck-/BeEPy95v10@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 17/17] pwm: Take over maintainership of the PWM subsystem
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:50:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120416055012.GA3037@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120412122740.GB5353-RM9K5IK7kjIyiCvfTdI0JKcOhU4Rzj621B7CTYaBSLdn68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1895 bytes --]

* Thierry Reding wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 April 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >   * Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 10 April 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > I'm taking over the maintainership of the PWM subsystem. This commit
> > > > > also adds the URLs to the gitorious project and repository as well as
> > > > > any missing files related to the PWM subsystem.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-RM9K5IK7kjKj5M59NBduVrNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Note: I guess this patch in particular could use some Acked-by, maybe from
> > > > > Arnd and Sascha so that people will know this happens with their blessing.
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
> > > 
> > > As far as I can tell the series is in pretty good shape. I've integrated
> > > Shawn's latest comments and I think we could get this into 3.5. Does it make
> > > sense to take the PWM tree through Linux next before having it pulled into
> > > mainline during the next merge window?
> > 
> > Yes, that's the way to go. Just ask Stephen Rothwell to include it right
> > away if you are sufficiently happy with the contents and believe that they
> > don't break stuff.
> 
> I just saw that there's been some discussion to remove IS_ENABLED() and
> replace it by something else. So maybe I should wait another day or two
> until those changes settle in next.

Seems like this issue is resolved, but something else came up. In the !OF
builds, of_pwm_request() no longer builds because of_property_match_string()
and of_parse_phandle_with_args() have no dummies for !OF. I've posted patches
for these on Friday and they need to go in before the PWM subsystem. I could
also revert the IS_ENABLED() parts and go back to a #ifdef CONFIG_OF but I'd
rather not.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss