From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 - first shot
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 19:21:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205051921.13209.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205052108.03001.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Saturday 05 May 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Now, if you insist on us having a separate mach- directory for every platform
> (SoC), we can do that I think, but then we should start with splitting up the
> existing mach-shmobile into a number of SoC-specific directories rather than
> adding new mach- directories for random new parts, because that goes against
> our development history to date, which is important too IMHO.
All the chips in there so far share a common ancestry and they all use a
significant subset of the same drivers shared with arch/sh: i2c-sh_mobile,
sh-dma-engine, sh_cmt, sh-sci, sh_tmu, intc, pfc and sh_clk. AFAICT, this one
uses none of those and apparently was developed by NEC before the merger with
Renesas.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, horms@verge.net.au,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lethal@linux-sh.org,
olof@lixom.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 - first shot
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 19:21:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205051921.13209.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205052108.03001.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Saturday 05 May 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Now, if you insist on us having a separate mach- directory for every platform
> (SoC), we can do that I think, but then we should start with splitting up the
> existing mach-shmobile into a number of SoC-specific directories rather than
> adding new mach- directories for random new parts, because that goes against
> our development history to date, which is important too IMHO.
All the chips in there so far share a common ancestry and they all use a
significant subset of the same drivers shared with arch/sh: i2c-sh_mobile,
sh-dma-engine, sh_cmt, sh-sci, sh_tmu, intc, pfc and sh_clk. AFAICT, this one
uses none of those and apparently was developed by NEC before the merger with
Renesas.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 - first shot
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 19:21:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205051921.13209.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205052108.03001.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Saturday 05 May 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Now, if you insist on us having a separate mach- directory for every platform
> (SoC), we can do that I think, but then we should start with splitting up the
> existing mach-shmobile into a number of SoC-specific directories rather than
> adding new mach- directories for random new parts, because that goes against
> our development history to date, which is important too IMHO.
All the chips in there so far share a common ancestry and they all use a
significant subset of the same drivers shared with arch/sh: i2c-sh_mobile,
sh-dma-engine, sh_cmt, sh-sci, sh_tmu, intc, pfc and sh_clk. AFAICT, this one
uses none of those and apparently was developed by NEC before the merger with
Renesas.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-05 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-03 14:46 [PATCH 00/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 - first shot Magnus Damm
2012-05-03 14:46 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-03 14:46 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-03 14:46 ` [PATCH 01/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 SoC base support Magnus Damm
2012-05-03 14:46 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-03 14:46 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-04 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 19:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 19:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 19:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-08 16:56 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-08 16:56 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-08 16:56 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-08 19:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-08 19:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-08 19:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-03 14:47 ` [PATCH 02/02] mach-shmobile: KZM9D board prototype support Magnus Damm
2012-05-03 14:47 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-03 14:47 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-04 13:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 13:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 13:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-03 19:23 ` [PATCH 00/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 - first shot Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-03 19:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-03 19:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-04 19:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 19:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 19:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-04 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-04 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05 7:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-05 7:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-05 7:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-05 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05 19:21 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-05-05 19:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-05 19:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-05 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-05 19:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-05 19:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-05 19:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-06 14:23 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-06 14:23 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-06 14:23 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-08 20:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-08 20:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-08 20:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-09 7:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-05-09 7:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-05-09 7:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-05-09 8:12 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-09 8:12 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-09 8:12 ` Magnus Damm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201205051921.13209.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.