From: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, hpa@linux.intel.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:11:54 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120619041154.GA28651@shangw> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1340059850.3416.3.camel@lappy> >> * Can you please post disassembly of the whole function? It seems >> like rsv->regions[] was corrupt. I want to verify other registers >> too. I'm not sure that it was caused by some kind of conflicting here. It seems that the memory used by reserved regions was deallocated before the crash as following log indicates. [ 0.000000] memblock: reserved array is doubled to 256 at [0x102febf080-0x102fec087f] [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x0000102febf080-0x0000102fec0880] memblock_double_array+0x1c5/0x1e2 : : [ 0.000000] memblock: reserved array is doubled to 512 at [0x102febc080-0x102febf07f] [ 0.000000] memblock_free: [0x0000102febf080-0x0000102fec0880] memblock_double_array+0x1b0/0x1e2 [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x0000102febc080-0x0000102febf080] memblock_double_array+0x1c5/0x1e2 : : [ 0.000000] memblock_free: [0x0000102febc080-0x0000102febf080] memblock_free_reserved_regions+0x37/0x39 Here, [0x0000102febc080-0x0000102febf080] was released to available memory block by function free_low_memory_core_early(). I'm not sure the release memblock might be taken by bootmem, but I think it's worthy to have a try of removing following 2 lines: memblock_free_reserved_regions() and memblock_reserve_reserved_regions() unsigned long __init free_low_memory_core_early(int nodeid) { unsigned long count = 0; phys_addr_t start, end; u64 i; /* free reserved array temporarily so that it's treated as free area */ /* memblock_free_reserved_regions(); -REMOVED */ for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL) { unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_UP(start); unsigned long end_pfn = min_t(unsigned long, PFN_DOWN(end), max_low_pfn); if (start_pfn < end_pfn) { __free_pages_memory(start_pfn, end_pfn); count += end_pfn - start_pfn; } } /* put region array back? */ /* memblock_reserve_reserved_regions(); -REMOVED */ return count; } Thanks, Gavin > >Here it is, with the patch you've asked to be tested applied if it matters any: > >0000000000000000 <__next_free_mem_range>: > * in lockstep and returns each intersection. > */ >void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, > phys_addr_t *out_start, > phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid) >{ > 0: 55 push %rbp > 1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > 4: 41 57 push %r15 > 6: 41 56 push %r14 > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > struct memblock_region *r = &rsv->regions[ri]; > 8: 45 31 f6 xor %r14d,%r14d > * in lockstep and returns each intersection. > */ >void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, > phys_addr_t *out_start, > phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid) >{ > b: 41 55 push %r13 > d: 41 54 push %r12 > f: 53 push %rbx > 10: 48 83 ec 38 sub $0x38,%rsp > 14: 48 89 55 b0 mov %rdx,-0x50(%rbp) > 18: 48 89 4d a8 mov %rcx,-0x58(%rbp) > 1c: 48 89 7d b8 mov %rdi,-0x48(%rbp) > 20: 4c 89 45 a0 mov %r8,-0x60(%rbp) > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > int ri = *idx >> 32; > > for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) { > 24: 48 8b 0d 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%rcx # 2b <__next_free_mem_range+0x2b> > 27: R_X86_64_PC32 memblock+0x4 > phys_addr_t *out_start, > phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid) >{ > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > 2b: 48 8b 07 mov (%rdi),%rax > /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > 2e: 4c 8b 1d 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%r11 # 35 <__next_free_mem_range+0x35> > 31: R_X86_64_PC32 memblock+0x24 > phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid) >{ > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > int ri = *idx >> 32; > 35: 48 89 c2 mov %rax,%rdx > phys_addr_t *out_start, > phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid) >{ > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > 38: 48 89 45 d0 mov %rax,-0x30(%rbp) > int ri = *idx >> 32; > 3c: 48 c1 ea 20 shr $0x20,%rdx > > for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) { > struct memblock_region *m = &mem->regions[mi]; > 40: 48 8b 05 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%rax # 47 <__next_free_mem_range+0x47> > 43: R_X86_64_PC32 memblock+0x1c > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > int ri = *idx >> 32; > > for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) { > 47: 48 89 4d c8 mov %rcx,-0x38(%rbp) > struct memblock_region *m = &mem->regions[mi]; > 4b: 48 89 45 c0 mov %rax,-0x40(%rbp) > /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > 4f: 49 8d 5b 01 lea 0x1(%r11),%rbx > struct memblock_region *r = &rsv->regions[ri]; > 53: 4c 8b 25 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%r12 # 5a <__next_free_mem_range+0x5a> > 56: R_X86_64_PC32 memblock+0x3c > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > int ri = *idx >> 32; > > for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) { > 5a: e9 c8 00 00 00 jmpq 127 <__next_free_mem_range+0x127> > struct memblock_region *m = &mem->regions[mi]; > 5f: 4d 6b ed 18 imul $0x18,%r13,%r13 > 63: 4c 03 6d c0 add -0x40(%rbp),%r13 > phys_addr_t m_start = m->base; > 67: 4d 8b 4d 00 mov 0x0(%r13),%r9 > phys_addr_t m_end = m->base + m->size; > 6b: 4d 89 ca mov %r9,%r10 > 6e: 4d 03 55 08 add 0x8(%r13),%r10 > > /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > 72: 81 fe 00 04 00 00 cmp $0x400,%esi > 78: 0f 84 9a 00 00 00 je 118 <__next_free_mem_range+0x118> > r->nid = nid; >} > >static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r) >{ > return r->nid; > 7e: 41 3b 75 10 cmp 0x10(%r13),%esi > 82: 0f 85 9c 00 00 00 jne 124 <__next_free_mem_range+0x124> > 88: e9 8b 00 00 00 jmpq 118 <__next_free_mem_range+0x118> > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > struct memblock_region *r = &rsv->regions[ri]; > 8d: 4c 6b c0 18 imul $0x18,%rax,%r8 > phys_addr_t r_start = ri ? r[-1].base + r[-1].size : 0; > 91: 31 c9 xor %ecx,%ecx > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > struct memblock_region *r = &rsv->regions[ri]; > 93: 4f 8d 04 04 lea (%r12,%r8,1),%r8 > phys_addr_t r_start = ri ? r[-1].base + r[-1].size : 0; > 97: 85 d2 test %edx,%edx > 99: 74 08 je a3 <__next_free_mem_range+0xa3> > 9b: 49 8b 48 f0 mov -0x10(%r8),%rcx > 9f: 49 03 48 e8 add -0x18(%r8),%rcx > phys_addr_t r_end = ri < rsv->cnt ? r->base : ULLONG_MAX; > a3: 48 83 cf ff or $0xffffffffffffffff,%rdi > a7: 4c 39 d8 cmp %r11,%rax > aa: 73 03 jae af <__next_free_mem_range+0xaf> > ac: 49 8b 38 mov (%r8),%rdi > > /* if ri advanced past mi, break out to advance mi */ > if (r_start >= m_end) > af: 4c 39 d1 cmp %r10,%rcx > b2: 73 70 jae 124 <__next_free_mem_range+0x124> > break; > /* if the two regions intersect, we're done */ > if (m_start < r_end) { > b4: 4c 39 cf cmp %r9,%rdi > b7: 76 5d jbe 116 <__next_free_mem_range+0x116> > if (out_start) > b9: 48 83 7d b0 00 cmpq $0x0,-0x50(%rbp) > be: 74 0e je ce <__next_free_mem_range+0xce> > *out_start = max(m_start, r_start); > c0: 4c 39 c9 cmp %r9,%rcx > c3: 48 8b 45 b0 mov -0x50(%rbp),%rax > c7: 49 0f 42 c9 cmovb %r9,%rcx > cb: 48 89 08 mov %rcx,(%rax) > if (out_end) > ce: 48 83 7d a8 00 cmpq $0x0,-0x58(%rbp) > d3: 74 11 je e6 <__next_free_mem_range+0xe6> > *out_end = min(m_end, r_end); > d5: 4c 39 d7 cmp %r10,%rdi > d8: 4c 89 d0 mov %r10,%rax > db: 48 8b 4d a8 mov -0x58(%rbp),%rcx > df: 48 0f 46 c7 cmovbe %rdi,%rax > e3: 48 89 01 mov %rax,(%rcx) > if (out_nid) > e6: 48 83 7d a0 00 cmpq $0x0,-0x60(%rbp) > eb: 74 0a je f7 <__next_free_mem_range+0xf7> > *out_nid = memblock_get_region_node(m); > ed: 41 8b 45 10 mov 0x10(%r13),%eax > f1: 48 8b 4d a0 mov -0x60(%rbp),%rcx > f5: 89 01 mov %eax,(%rcx) > /* > * The region which ends first is advanced > * for the next iteration. > */ > if (m_end <= r_end) > f7: 4c 39 d7 cmp %r10,%rdi > fa: 72 05 jb 101 <__next_free_mem_range+0x101> > mi++; > fc: 41 ff c7 inc %r15d > ff: eb 02 jmp 103 <__next_free_mem_range+0x103> > else > ri++; > 101: ff c2 inc %edx > *idx = (u32)mi | (u64)ri << 32; > 103: 48 c1 e2 20 shl $0x20,%rdx > 107: 45 89 ff mov %r15d,%r15d > 10a: 48 8b 45 b8 mov -0x48(%rbp),%rax > 10e: 4c 09 fa or %r15,%rdx > 111: 48 89 10 mov %rdx,(%rax) > return; > 114: eb 30 jmp 146 <__next_free_mem_range+0x146> > /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > 116: ff c2 inc %edx > 118: 48 63 c2 movslq %edx,%rax > 11b: 48 39 d8 cmp %rbx,%rax > 11e: 0f 82 69 ff ff ff jb 8d <__next_free_mem_range+0x8d> > 124: 41 ff c6 inc %r14d > 127: 8b 4d d0 mov -0x30(%rbp),%ecx > 12a: 45 8d 3c 0e lea (%r14,%rcx,1),%r15d > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > int ri = *idx >> 32; > > for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) { > 12e: 4d 63 ef movslq %r15d,%r13 > 131: 4c 3b 6d c8 cmp -0x38(%rbp),%r13 > 135: 0f 82 24 ff ff ff jb 5f <__next_free_mem_range+0x5f> > } > } > } > > /* signal end of iteration */ > *idx = ULLONG_MAX; > 13b: 48 8b 45 b8 mov -0x48(%rbp),%rax > 13f: 48 c7 00 ff ff ff ff movq $0xffffffffffffffff,(%rax) >} > 146: 48 83 c4 38 add $0x38,%rsp > 14a: 5b pop %rbx > 14b: 41 5c pop %r12 > 14d: 41 5d pop %r13 > 14f: 41 5e pop %r14 > 151: 41 5f pop %r15 > 153: c9 leaveq > 154: c3 retq > >> * Can you please try the following patch? >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/15/510 > >The patch didn't seem to help. > >Since this is pretty easy to reproduce, let me know if adding any debug code will prove to be helpful in further analysis. > > >-- >To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in >the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, >see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . >Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, hpa@linux.intel.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:11:54 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120619041154.GA28651@shangw> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1340059850.3416.3.camel@lappy> >> * Can you please post disassembly of the whole function? It seems >> like rsv->regions[] was corrupt. I want to verify other registers >> too. I'm not sure that it was caused by some kind of conflicting here. It seems that the memory used by reserved regions was deallocated before the crash as following log indicates. [ 0.000000] memblock: reserved array is doubled to 256 at [0x102febf080-0x102fec087f] [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x0000102febf080-0x0000102fec0880] memblock_double_array+0x1c5/0x1e2 : : [ 0.000000] memblock: reserved array is doubled to 512 at [0x102febc080-0x102febf07f] [ 0.000000] memblock_free: [0x0000102febf080-0x0000102fec0880] memblock_double_array+0x1b0/0x1e2 [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x0000102febc080-0x0000102febf080] memblock_double_array+0x1c5/0x1e2 : : [ 0.000000] memblock_free: [0x0000102febc080-0x0000102febf080] memblock_free_reserved_regions+0x37/0x39 Here, [0x0000102febc080-0x0000102febf080] was released to available memory block by function free_low_memory_core_early(). I'm not sure the release memblock might be taken by bootmem, but I think it's worthy to have a try of removing following 2 lines: memblock_free_reserved_regions() and memblock_reserve_reserved_regions() unsigned long __init free_low_memory_core_early(int nodeid) { unsigned long count = 0; phys_addr_t start, end; u64 i; /* free reserved array temporarily so that it's treated as free area */ /* memblock_free_reserved_regions(); -REMOVED */ for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL) { unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_UP(start); unsigned long end_pfn = min_t(unsigned long, PFN_DOWN(end), max_low_pfn); if (start_pfn < end_pfn) { __free_pages_memory(start_pfn, end_pfn); count += end_pfn - start_pfn; } } /* put region array back? */ /* memblock_reserve_reserved_regions(); -REMOVED */ return count; } Thanks, Gavin > >Here it is, with the patch you've asked to be tested applied if it matters any: > >0000000000000000 <__next_free_mem_range>: > * in lockstep and returns each intersection. > */ >void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, > phys_addr_t *out_start, > phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid) >{ > 0: 55 push %rbp > 1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > 4: 41 57 push %r15 > 6: 41 56 push %r14 > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > struct memblock_region *r = &rsv->regions[ri]; > 8: 45 31 f6 xor %r14d,%r14d > * in lockstep and returns each intersection. > */ >void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, > phys_addr_t *out_start, > phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid) >{ > b: 41 55 push %r13 > d: 41 54 push %r12 > f: 53 push %rbx > 10: 48 83 ec 38 sub $0x38,%rsp > 14: 48 89 55 b0 mov %rdx,-0x50(%rbp) > 18: 48 89 4d a8 mov %rcx,-0x58(%rbp) > 1c: 48 89 7d b8 mov %rdi,-0x48(%rbp) > 20: 4c 89 45 a0 mov %r8,-0x60(%rbp) > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > int ri = *idx >> 32; > > for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) { > 24: 48 8b 0d 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%rcx # 2b <__next_free_mem_range+0x2b> > 27: R_X86_64_PC32 memblock+0x4 > phys_addr_t *out_start, > phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid) >{ > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > 2b: 48 8b 07 mov (%rdi),%rax > /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > 2e: 4c 8b 1d 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%r11 # 35 <__next_free_mem_range+0x35> > 31: R_X86_64_PC32 memblock+0x24 > phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid) >{ > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > int ri = *idx >> 32; > 35: 48 89 c2 mov %rax,%rdx > phys_addr_t *out_start, > phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid) >{ > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > 38: 48 89 45 d0 mov %rax,-0x30(%rbp) > int ri = *idx >> 32; > 3c: 48 c1 ea 20 shr $0x20,%rdx > > for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) { > struct memblock_region *m = &mem->regions[mi]; > 40: 48 8b 05 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%rax # 47 <__next_free_mem_range+0x47> > 43: R_X86_64_PC32 memblock+0x1c > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > int ri = *idx >> 32; > > for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) { > 47: 48 89 4d c8 mov %rcx,-0x38(%rbp) > struct memblock_region *m = &mem->regions[mi]; > 4b: 48 89 45 c0 mov %rax,-0x40(%rbp) > /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > 4f: 49 8d 5b 01 lea 0x1(%r11),%rbx > struct memblock_region *r = &rsv->regions[ri]; > 53: 4c 8b 25 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(%rip),%r12 # 5a <__next_free_mem_range+0x5a> > 56: R_X86_64_PC32 memblock+0x3c > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > int ri = *idx >> 32; > > for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) { > 5a: e9 c8 00 00 00 jmpq 127 <__next_free_mem_range+0x127> > struct memblock_region *m = &mem->regions[mi]; > 5f: 4d 6b ed 18 imul $0x18,%r13,%r13 > 63: 4c 03 6d c0 add -0x40(%rbp),%r13 > phys_addr_t m_start = m->base; > 67: 4d 8b 4d 00 mov 0x0(%r13),%r9 > phys_addr_t m_end = m->base + m->size; > 6b: 4d 89 ca mov %r9,%r10 > 6e: 4d 03 55 08 add 0x8(%r13),%r10 > > /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > 72: 81 fe 00 04 00 00 cmp $0x400,%esi > 78: 0f 84 9a 00 00 00 je 118 <__next_free_mem_range+0x118> > r->nid = nid; >} > >static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r) >{ > return r->nid; > 7e: 41 3b 75 10 cmp 0x10(%r13),%esi > 82: 0f 85 9c 00 00 00 jne 124 <__next_free_mem_range+0x124> > 88: e9 8b 00 00 00 jmpq 118 <__next_free_mem_range+0x118> > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > struct memblock_region *r = &rsv->regions[ri]; > 8d: 4c 6b c0 18 imul $0x18,%rax,%r8 > phys_addr_t r_start = ri ? r[-1].base + r[-1].size : 0; > 91: 31 c9 xor %ecx,%ecx > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > struct memblock_region *r = &rsv->regions[ri]; > 93: 4f 8d 04 04 lea (%r12,%r8,1),%r8 > phys_addr_t r_start = ri ? r[-1].base + r[-1].size : 0; > 97: 85 d2 test %edx,%edx > 99: 74 08 je a3 <__next_free_mem_range+0xa3> > 9b: 49 8b 48 f0 mov -0x10(%r8),%rcx > 9f: 49 03 48 e8 add -0x18(%r8),%rcx > phys_addr_t r_end = ri < rsv->cnt ? r->base : ULLONG_MAX; > a3: 48 83 cf ff or $0xffffffffffffffff,%rdi > a7: 4c 39 d8 cmp %r11,%rax > aa: 73 03 jae af <__next_free_mem_range+0xaf> > ac: 49 8b 38 mov (%r8),%rdi > > /* if ri advanced past mi, break out to advance mi */ > if (r_start >= m_end) > af: 4c 39 d1 cmp %r10,%rcx > b2: 73 70 jae 124 <__next_free_mem_range+0x124> > break; > /* if the two regions intersect, we're done */ > if (m_start < r_end) { > b4: 4c 39 cf cmp %r9,%rdi > b7: 76 5d jbe 116 <__next_free_mem_range+0x116> > if (out_start) > b9: 48 83 7d b0 00 cmpq $0x0,-0x50(%rbp) > be: 74 0e je ce <__next_free_mem_range+0xce> > *out_start = max(m_start, r_start); > c0: 4c 39 c9 cmp %r9,%rcx > c3: 48 8b 45 b0 mov -0x50(%rbp),%rax > c7: 49 0f 42 c9 cmovb %r9,%rcx > cb: 48 89 08 mov %rcx,(%rax) > if (out_end) > ce: 48 83 7d a8 00 cmpq $0x0,-0x58(%rbp) > d3: 74 11 je e6 <__next_free_mem_range+0xe6> > *out_end = min(m_end, r_end); > d5: 4c 39 d7 cmp %r10,%rdi > d8: 4c 89 d0 mov %r10,%rax > db: 48 8b 4d a8 mov -0x58(%rbp),%rcx > df: 48 0f 46 c7 cmovbe %rdi,%rax > e3: 48 89 01 mov %rax,(%rcx) > if (out_nid) > e6: 48 83 7d a0 00 cmpq $0x0,-0x60(%rbp) > eb: 74 0a je f7 <__next_free_mem_range+0xf7> > *out_nid = memblock_get_region_node(m); > ed: 41 8b 45 10 mov 0x10(%r13),%eax > f1: 48 8b 4d a0 mov -0x60(%rbp),%rcx > f5: 89 01 mov %eax,(%rcx) > /* > * The region which ends first is advanced > * for the next iteration. > */ > if (m_end <= r_end) > f7: 4c 39 d7 cmp %r10,%rdi > fa: 72 05 jb 101 <__next_free_mem_range+0x101> > mi++; > fc: 41 ff c7 inc %r15d > ff: eb 02 jmp 103 <__next_free_mem_range+0x103> > else > ri++; > 101: ff c2 inc %edx > *idx = (u32)mi | (u64)ri << 32; > 103: 48 c1 e2 20 shl $0x20,%rdx > 107: 45 89 ff mov %r15d,%r15d > 10a: 48 8b 45 b8 mov -0x48(%rbp),%rax > 10e: 4c 09 fa or %r15,%rdx > 111: 48 89 10 mov %rdx,(%rax) > return; > 114: eb 30 jmp 146 <__next_free_mem_range+0x146> > /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ > if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m)) > continue; > > /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */ > for ( ; ri < rsv->cnt + 1; ri++) { > 116: ff c2 inc %edx > 118: 48 63 c2 movslq %edx,%rax > 11b: 48 39 d8 cmp %rbx,%rax > 11e: 0f 82 69 ff ff ff jb 8d <__next_free_mem_range+0x8d> > 124: 41 ff c6 inc %r14d > 127: 8b 4d d0 mov -0x30(%rbp),%ecx > 12a: 45 8d 3c 0e lea (%r14,%rcx,1),%r15d > struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory; > struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved; > int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff; > int ri = *idx >> 32; > > for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) { > 12e: 4d 63 ef movslq %r15d,%r13 > 131: 4c 3b 6d c8 cmp -0x38(%rbp),%r13 > 135: 0f 82 24 ff ff ff jb 5f <__next_free_mem_range+0x5f> > } > } > } > > /* signal end of iteration */ > *idx = ULLONG_MAX; > 13b: 48 8b 45 b8 mov -0x48(%rbp),%rax > 13f: 48 c7 00 ff ff ff ff movq $0xffffffffffffffff,(%rax) >} > 146: 48 83 c4 38 add $0x38,%rsp > 14a: 5b pop %rbx > 14b: 41 5c pop %r12 > 14d: 41 5d pop %r13 > 14f: 41 5e pop %r14 > 151: 41 5f pop %r15 > 153: c9 leaveq > 154: c3 retq > >> * Can you please try the following patch? >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/15/510 > >The patch didn't seem to help. > >Since this is pretty easy to reproduce, let me know if adding any debug code will prove to be helpful in further analysis. > > >-- >To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in >the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, >see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . >Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 4:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-06-13 21:38 Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory Sasha Levin 2012-06-14 3:20 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-14 3:20 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-14 9:50 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-14 9:50 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-14 20:56 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-14 20:56 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-14 21:34 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-14 21:34 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-14 23:57 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-14 23:57 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-15 0:59 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-15 0:59 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-15 0:59 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-15 2:21 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-15 2:21 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-15 7:41 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-15 7:41 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-18 22:32 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-18 22:32 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-18 22:50 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-18 22:50 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-19 4:11 ` Gavin Shan [this message] 2012-06-19 4:11 ` Gavin Shan 2012-06-19 5:43 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-19 5:43 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-19 6:09 ` Gavin Shan 2012-06-19 6:09 ` Gavin Shan 2012-06-19 18:12 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-19 18:12 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-19 21:20 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-19 21:20 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-19 21:26 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-19 21:26 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-20 2:57 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-21 20:17 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-21 20:17 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-22 1:47 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-22 1:58 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-22 18:51 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-22 18:51 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-22 19:23 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-22 19:23 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-22 19:29 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-22 19:29 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-22 20:01 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-22 20:01 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-22 20:14 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-22 20:14 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-22 20:23 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-22 20:23 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-23 2:14 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-27 18:13 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-27 18:13 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-27 19:22 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-27 19:22 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-27 19:26 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-27 19:26 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-27 21:15 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-29 18:27 ` [PATCH for -3.5] memblock: free allocated memblock_reserved_regions later Yinghai Lu 2012-06-29 18:27 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-29 18:32 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-29 18:32 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-29 18:38 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-29 18:38 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-21 20:19 ` Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory Tejun Heo 2012-06-21 20:19 ` Tejun Heo 2012-06-22 10:29 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-22 10:29 ` Sasha Levin 2012-06-22 18:15 ` Yinghai Lu 2012-06-22 18:15 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20120619041154.GA28651@shangw \ --to=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \ --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.