All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm: vmscan: Scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 08:55:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120808075526.GI29814@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120808014824.GB4247@bbox>

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:48:24AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Mel,
> 
> Just out of curiosity.
> What's the problem did you see? (ie, What's the problem do this patch solve?)

Everythign in this series is related to the problem in the leader - high
order allocation success rates are lower. This patch increases the success
rates when allocating under load.

> AFAIUC, it seem to solve consecutive allocation success ratio through
> getting several free pageblocks all at once in a process/kswapd
> reclaim context. Right?

Only pageblocks if it is order-9 on x86, it reclaims an amount that depends
on an allocation size. This only happens during reclaim/compaction context
when we know that a high-order allocation has recently failed. The objective
is to reclaim enough order-0 pages so that compaction can succeed again.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm: vmscan: Scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 08:55:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120808075526.GI29814@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120808014824.GB4247@bbox>

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:48:24AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Mel,
> 
> Just out of curiosity.
> What's the problem did you see? (ie, What's the problem do this patch solve?)

Everythign in this series is related to the problem in the leader - high
order allocation success rates are lower. This patch increases the success
rates when allocating under load.

> AFAIUC, it seem to solve consecutive allocation success ratio through
> getting several free pageblocks all at once in a process/kswapd
> reclaim context. Right?

Only pageblocks if it is order-9 on x86, it reclaims an amount that depends
on an allocation size. This only happens during reclaim/compaction context
when we know that a high-order allocation has recently failed. The objective
is to reclaim enough order-0 pages so that compaction can succeed again.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-07 12:31 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Improve hugepage allocation success rates under load Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 12:31 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 12:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: compaction: Update comment in try_to_compact_pages Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 12:31   ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 13:19   ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-07 13:19     ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-07 23:25   ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-07 23:25     ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-07 12:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: vmscan: Scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 12:31   ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 13:23   ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-07 13:23     ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-08  1:48   ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-08  1:48     ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-08  7:55     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-08-08  7:55       ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-08  8:27       ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-08  8:27         ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-08  8:51         ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-08  8:51           ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-08 23:51           ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-08 23:51             ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-09  7:49             ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-09  7:49               ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-09  8:27               ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-09  8:27                 ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-09  9:20                 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-09  9:20                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-09 20:29                   ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-09 20:29                     ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-10  8:14                     ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-10  8:14                       ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-09 23:27                   ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-09 23:27                     ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-10  8:34                     ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-10  8:34                       ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-10  8:48                       ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-10  8:48                         ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-07 12:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm: kswapd: Continue reclaiming for reclaim/compaction if the minimum number of pages have not been reclaimed Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 12:31   ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 13:26   ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-07 13:26     ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-08  2:07   ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-08  2:07     ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-08  9:07     ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-08  9:07       ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-08  9:58       ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-08  9:58         ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 12:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm: compaction: Capture a suitable high-order page immediately when it is made available Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 12:31   ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 13:30   ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-07 13:30     ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-07 12:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm: have order > 0 compaction start off where it left Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 12:31   ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 12:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: have order > 0 compaction start near a pageblock with free pages Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 12:31   ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 14:45   ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-07 14:45     ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-07 14:52     ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 14:52       ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 15:20       ` Jim Schutt
2012-08-07 15:20         ` Jim Schutt
2012-08-07 15:45         ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-07 15:45           ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-08  4:36   ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-08  4:36     ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-08 10:18     ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-08 10:18       ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120808075526.GI29814@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=jaschut@sandia.gov \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.