All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Krystian Garbaciak <krystian.garbaciak@diasemi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
	"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	"Liam Girdwood" <lrg@ti.com>,
	"Alessandro Zummo" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"Jean Delvare" <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Ashish Jangam" <ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Donggeun Kim" <dg77.kim@samsung.com>,
	"Philippe Rétornaz" <philippe.retornaz@epfl.ch>,
	"Wim Van Sebroeck" <wim@iguana.be>,
	"Bryan Wu" <bryan.wu@canonical.com>,
	"Richard Purdie" <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
	"Anthony Olech" <anthony.olech@diasemi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] regulator: Add Dialog DA906x voltage regulators support.
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:47:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120830174738.GH4356@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208291550@sw-eng-lt-dc-vm2>

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Krystian Garbaciak wrote:

> Because, for some regulators, this is required: val += fvol->offset,
> I was only able to reduce it to the following form.

What on earth makes you say this?  The above is obviously linear.

Besides, you're missing several points here.  One is that you should be
using the framework features, another is that you should be implementing
_sel.

> > > +	bits = da906x_reg_read(hw, DA906X_REG_STATUS_D);
> > > +	if (bits < 0)
> > > +		return IRQ_HANDLED;

> > If you fail to detect an interrupt you report that you handled one...?

> For me there is no sensible return value for this case.

IRQ_NONE.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Krystian Garbaciak <krystian.garbaciak@diasemi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
	"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	"Liam Girdwood" <lrg@ti.com>,
	"Alessandro Zummo" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"Jean Delvare" <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Ashish Jangam" <ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Donggeun Kim" <dg77.kim@samsung.com>,
	"Philippe Rétornaz" <philippe.retornaz@epfl.ch>,
	"Wim Van Sebroeck" <wim@iguana.be>,
	"Bryan Wu" <bryan.wu@canonical.com>,
	"Richard Purdie" <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
	"Anthony Olech" <anthony.olech@diasemi.com>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH 2/8] regulator: Add Dialog DA906x voltage regulators support.
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:47:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120830174738.GH4356@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208291550@sw-eng-lt-dc-vm2>

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Krystian Garbaciak wrote:

> Because, for some regulators, this is required: val += fvol->offset,
> I was only able to reduce it to the following form.

What on earth makes you say this?  The above is obviously linear.

Besides, you're missing several points here.  One is that you should be
using the framework features, another is that you should be implementing
_sel.

> > > +	bits = da906x_reg_read(hw, DA906X_REG_STATUS_D);
> > > +	if (bits < 0)
> > > +		return IRQ_HANDLED;

> > If you fail to detect an interrupt you report that you handled one...?

> For me there is no sensible return value for this case.

IRQ_NONE.

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-30 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-24 13:45 [RFC PATCH 0/8] DA906x PMIC driver Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 13:45 ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/8] mfd: Add Dialog DA906x core driver Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 13:50   ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 13:55   ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] regulator: Add Dialog DA906x voltage regulators support Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 13:55     ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:00     ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] rtc: Add RTC driver for DA906x PMIC Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:00       ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:05       ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] hwmon: Add DA906x hardware monitoring support Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:05         ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:10         ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] input: Add support for DA906x PMIC OnKey detection Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:10           ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:15           ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] input: Add support for DA906x vibration motor driver Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:15             ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:20             ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] watchdog: Add DA906x PMIC watchdog driver Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:20               ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:25               ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] leds: Add DA906x PMIC LED driver Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 14:25                 ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24 18:45         ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] hwmon: Add DA906x hardware monitoring support Guenter Roeck
2012-08-24 18:45           ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2012-08-29 13:25           ` [PATCH] regulator: Fix bug in regulator_mode_to_status() core function Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-29 13:25             ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-25 15:10     ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] regulator: Add Dialog DA906x voltage regulators support Mark Brown
2012-08-25 15:10       ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2012-08-29 14:50       ` Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-29 14:50         ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-29 14:50         ` Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-30 17:47         ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-08-30 17:47           ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2012-08-31 10:00           ` Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-31 10:00             ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-31 10:00             ` Krystian Garbaciak
2013-05-09 14:05             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-05-09 14:18               ` Anthony Olech
2013-05-09 14:28                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-05-09 14:42                   ` Anthony Olech
2013-05-09 14:50                     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-08-25 18:31   ` [PATCH 1/8] mfd: Add Dialog DA906x core driver Mark Brown
2012-08-25 18:31     ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2012-08-31 11:20     ` Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-31 11:20       ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-31 11:20       ` Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-31 11:37       ` Philippe Rétornaz
2012-08-31 11:37         ` [lm-sensors] " Philippe Rétornaz
2012-08-31 11:37         ` Philippe Rétornaz
2012-08-31 11:37         ` Philippe Rétornaz
2012-08-31 17:16       ` Mark Brown
2012-08-31 17:16         ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-24  8:32 [RFC PATCH 0/8] DA906x PMIC driver Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32 ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32 ` [PATCH 1/8] mfd: Add Dialog DA906x core driver Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32   ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32   ` [PATCH 2/8] regulator: Add Dialog DA906x voltage regulators support Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32     ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32     ` [PATCH 3/8] rtc: Add RTC driver for DA906x PMIC Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32       ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32       ` [PATCH 4/8] hwmon: Add DA906x hardware monitoring support Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32         ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32         ` [PATCH 5/8] input: Add support for DA906x PMIC OnKey detection Krystian Garbaciak
2012-08-24  8:32           ` [lm-sensors] " Krystian Garbaciak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120830174738.GH4356@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=anthony.olech@diasemi.com \
    --cc=ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com \
    --cc=bryan.wu@canonical.com \
    --cc=dg77.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=krystian.garbaciak@diasemi.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    --cc=philippe.retornaz@epfl.ch \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.