All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: Fix kconfig option
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 03:02:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906100247.GA27355@koverstreet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120906094956.GB22816@redhat.com>

On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:41:13AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > > Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> writes:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
> > > > > > instead.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is a slight mis-understanding.  It's supposed to be selected by
> > > > > the particular driver, probably virtio_pci in your case.
> > > > 
> > > > So are you saying virtio-blk depends on virtio-pci? If so, the kconfig
> > > > should have that.
> > > > 
> > > > As is, VIRTIO_BLK just has:
> > > > 	depends on EXPERIMENTAL && VIRTIO
> > > > 
> > > > which is flat out broken.
> > > 
> > > I don't think anything is broken.
> > > Can you show an example of a broken configuration?
> > 
> > Do you not understand the difference between depends an selects?
> > Or did you not read my original mail?
> > Flip off everything in drivers -> virtio
> > 
> > Now go to drivers -> block and try to turn on virtio-blk.
> > 
> > It's not listed!
> 
> Yes. Because you disabled all virtio backends.
> It does not make sense to have any frontends.

How's a user - or even another kernel developer who isn't familiar with
virtio - supposed to know that?

I still don't know what exactly a virtio backend is - the term isn't
even mentioned anywhere that I've seen.

Whatever it is though virtio-blk should be depending on _that_, not a
config option that _isn't exposed in the menu_!

> > Now go back to drivers -> virtio and turn on (randomly) balloon.
> > 
> > Go back to drivers -> block, and now you can turn on virtio-blk!
> > 
> > Do you see what's wrong with this picture?
> 
> Yes. You got unlucky with your random guess.
> It's a bug in balloon kconfig: it should not
> select virtio.
> I sent a patch to fix that yesterday.

Then it's also a bug in the comments at the top of
drivers/virtio/Kconfig.

And besides that, how the _hell_ is a user supposed to know to turn on
VIRTIO_PCI before VIRTIO_BLK? It's not documented anywhere (if that is
what's supposed to happen! I still don't know) and even if it was
documented, having one kconfig option depend on something that's exposed
in a _completely different menu_ is just made of fail.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: Fix kconfig option
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 03:02:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906100247.GA27355@koverstreet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120906094956.GB22816@redhat.com>

On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:25:12AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:41:13AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > > Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> writes:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > CONFIG_VIRTIO isn't exposed, everything else is supposed to select it
> > > > > > instead.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is a slight mis-understanding.  It's supposed to be selected by
> > > > > the particular driver, probably virtio_pci in your case.
> > > > 
> > > > So are you saying virtio-blk depends on virtio-pci? If so, the kconfig
> > > > should have that.
> > > > 
> > > > As is, VIRTIO_BLK just has:
> > > > 	depends on EXPERIMENTAL && VIRTIO
> > > > 
> > > > which is flat out broken.
> > > 
> > > I don't think anything is broken.
> > > Can you show an example of a broken configuration?
> > 
> > Do you not understand the difference between depends an selects?
> > Or did you not read my original mail?
> > Flip off everything in drivers -> virtio
> > 
> > Now go to drivers -> block and try to turn on virtio-blk.
> > 
> > It's not listed!
> 
> Yes. Because you disabled all virtio backends.
> It does not make sense to have any frontends.

How's a user - or even another kernel developer who isn't familiar with
virtio - supposed to know that?

I still don't know what exactly a virtio backend is - the term isn't
even mentioned anywhere that I've seen.

Whatever it is though virtio-blk should be depending on _that_, not a
config option that _isn't exposed in the menu_!

> > Now go back to drivers -> virtio and turn on (randomly) balloon.
> > 
> > Go back to drivers -> block, and now you can turn on virtio-blk!
> > 
> > Do you see what's wrong with this picture?
> 
> Yes. You got unlucky with your random guess.
> It's a bug in balloon kconfig: it should not
> select virtio.
> I sent a patch to fix that yesterday.

Then it's also a bug in the comments at the top of
drivers/virtio/Kconfig.

And besides that, how the _hell_ is a user supposed to know to turn on
VIRTIO_PCI before VIRTIO_BLK? It's not documented anywhere (if that is
what's supposed to happen! I still don't know) and even if it was
documented, having one kconfig option depend on something that's exposed
in a _completely different menu_ is just made of fail.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-06 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-03  4:41 [PATCH] virtio-blk: Fix kconfig option Kent Overstreet
2012-09-03  4:46 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-03  4:46 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-04  6:23 ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-04  6:23   ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-04 23:12   ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-04 23:12     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-05  4:22   ` Asias He
2012-09-05  4:22     ` Asias He
2012-09-05  5:48     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05  5:48       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05  5:54       ` Asias He
2012-09-05  5:54         ` Asias He
2012-09-05  6:04         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05  6:04           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05  6:12   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05  6:12     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-06  1:46     ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-06  1:46       ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-06  7:41   ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-06  7:41     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-06  8:44     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-06  8:44       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-06  9:25       ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-06  9:25         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-06  9:49         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-06  9:49           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-06 10:02           ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2012-09-06 10:02             ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-06 10:18             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-06 10:18               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-06 10:31               ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-06 10:31                 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-06 11:09                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-06 11:09                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-06 23:40             ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-06 23:40               ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-07  0:25               ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07  0:25                 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07  2:57                 ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-07  2:57                   ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-03  4:41 Kent Overstreet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120906100247.GA27355@koverstreet-glaptop \
    --to=koverstreet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.