All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] mm, oom: ensure sysrq+f always passes valid zonelist
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:31:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121114133114.GA4929@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211140254020.6949@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Wed 14-11-12 03:03:02, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > > With hotpluggable and memoryless nodes, it's possible that node 0 will
> > > not be online, so use the first online node's zonelist rather than
> > > hardcoding node 0 to pass a zonelist with all zones to the oom killer.
> > 
> > Makes sense although I haven't seen a machine with no 0 node yet.
> 
> We routinely do testing with them, actually, just by physically removing 
> all memory described by the SRAT that maps to node 0.  You could do the 
> same thing by making all pxms that map to node 0 to be hotpluggable in 
> your memory affinity structure.  I've been bit by it one too many times so 
> I always keep in mind that no single node id is guaranteed to be online 
> (although at least one node is always online); hence, first_online_node is 
> the solution.

I thought that a boot cpu would be bound to a node0 or something similar.
Thanks for the clarification!

> > According to 13808910 this is indeed possible.
> > 
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> > 
> 
> Thanks!

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] mm, oom: ensure sysrq+f always passes valid zonelist
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:31:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121114133114.GA4929@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211140254020.6949@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Wed 14-11-12 03:03:02, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > > With hotpluggable and memoryless nodes, it's possible that node 0 will
> > > not be online, so use the first online node's zonelist rather than
> > > hardcoding node 0 to pass a zonelist with all zones to the oom killer.
> > 
> > Makes sense although I haven't seen a machine with no 0 node yet.
> 
> We routinely do testing with them, actually, just by physically removing 
> all memory described by the SRAT that maps to node 0.  You could do the 
> same thing by making all pxms that map to node 0 to be hotpluggable in 
> your memory affinity structure.  I've been bit by it one too many times so 
> I always keep in mind that no single node id is guaranteed to be online 
> (although at least one node is always online); hence, first_online_node is 
> the solution.

I thought that a boot cpu would be bound to a node0 or something similar.
Thanks for the clarification!

> > According to 13808910 this is indeed possible.
> > 
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> > 
> 
> Thanks!

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-14 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-14  9:15 [patch 1/4] mm, oom: ensure sysrq+f always passes valid zonelist David Rientjes
2012-11-14  9:15 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-14  9:15 ` [patch 2/4] mm, oom: cleanup pagefault oom handler David Rientjes
2012-11-14  9:15   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-14 13:32   ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 13:32     ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15  8:45   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  8:45     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  9:02     ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15  9:02       ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15 21:01     ` David Rientjes
2012-11-15 21:01       ` David Rientjes
2012-11-14  9:15 ` [patch 3/4] mm, oom: remove redundant sleep in " David Rientjes
2012-11-14  9:15   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-14 13:45   ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 13:45     ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15  8:46   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  8:46     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14  9:15 ` [patch 4/4] mm, oom: remove statically defined arch functions of same name David Rientjes
2012-11-14  9:15   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-14  9:15   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-14  9:15   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-14 13:47   ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 13:47     ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 13:47     ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 13:47     ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15  8:48   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  8:48     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  8:48     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  8:48     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14 10:50 ` [patch 1/4] mm, oom: ensure sysrq+f always passes valid zonelist Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 10:50   ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 11:03   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-14 11:03     ` David Rientjes
2012-11-14 13:31     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2012-11-14 13:31       ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15  8:41 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  8:41   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121114133114.GA4929@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.