From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] mm, oom: cleanup pagefault oom handler Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:02:04 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20121115090204.GA11990@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw) In-Reply-To: <50A4AB9E.4030106@jp.fujitsu.com> On Thu 15-11-12 17:45:18, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > (2012/11/14 18:15), David Rientjes wrote: [...] > >@@ -708,15 +671,17 @@ out: > > > > /* > > * The pagefault handler calls here because it is out of memory, so kill a > >- * memory-hogging task. If a populated zone has ZONE_OOM_LOCKED set, a parallel > >- * oom killing is already in progress so do nothing. If a task is found with > >- * TIF_MEMDIE set, it has been killed so do nothing and allow it to exit. > >+ * memory-hogging task. If any populated zone has ZONE_OOM_LOCKED set, a > >+ * parallel oom killing is already in progress so do nothing. > > */ > > void pagefault_out_of_memory(void) > > { > >- if (try_set_system_oom()) { > >+ struct zonelist *zonelist = node_zonelist(first_online_node, > >+ GFP_KERNEL); > > > why GFP_KERNEL ? not GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE ? I was wondering about the same but gfp_zonelist cares only about __GFP_THISNODE so GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE doesn't do any difference. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] mm, oom: cleanup pagefault oom handler Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:02:04 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20121115090204.GA11990@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw) In-Reply-To: <50A4AB9E.4030106@jp.fujitsu.com> On Thu 15-11-12 17:45:18, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > (2012/11/14 18:15), David Rientjes wrote: [...] > >@@ -708,15 +671,17 @@ out: > > > > /* > > * The pagefault handler calls here because it is out of memory, so kill a > >- * memory-hogging task. If a populated zone has ZONE_OOM_LOCKED set, a parallel > >- * oom killing is already in progress so do nothing. If a task is found with > >- * TIF_MEMDIE set, it has been killed so do nothing and allow it to exit. > >+ * memory-hogging task. If any populated zone has ZONE_OOM_LOCKED set, a > >+ * parallel oom killing is already in progress so do nothing. > > */ > > void pagefault_out_of_memory(void) > > { > >- if (try_set_system_oom()) { > >+ struct zonelist *zonelist = node_zonelist(first_online_node, > >+ GFP_KERNEL); > > > why GFP_KERNEL ? not GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE ? I was wondering about the same but gfp_zonelist cares only about __GFP_THISNODE so GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE doesn't do any difference. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-15 9:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-11-14 9:15 [patch 1/4] mm, oom: ensure sysrq+f always passes valid zonelist David Rientjes 2012-11-14 9:15 ` David Rientjes 2012-11-14 9:15 ` [patch 2/4] mm, oom: cleanup pagefault oom handler David Rientjes 2012-11-14 9:15 ` David Rientjes 2012-11-14 13:32 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-14 13:32 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-15 8:45 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki 2012-11-15 8:45 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki 2012-11-15 9:02 ` Michal Hocko [this message] 2012-11-15 9:02 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-15 21:01 ` David Rientjes 2012-11-15 21:01 ` David Rientjes 2012-11-14 9:15 ` [patch 3/4] mm, oom: remove redundant sleep in " David Rientjes 2012-11-14 9:15 ` David Rientjes 2012-11-14 13:45 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-14 13:45 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-15 8:46 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki 2012-11-15 8:46 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki 2012-11-14 9:15 ` [patch 4/4] mm, oom: remove statically defined arch functions of same name David Rientjes 2012-11-14 9:15 ` David Rientjes 2012-11-14 9:15 ` David Rientjes 2012-11-14 9:15 ` David Rientjes 2012-11-14 13:47 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-14 13:47 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-14 13:47 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-14 13:47 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-15 8:48 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki 2012-11-15 8:48 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki 2012-11-15 8:48 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki 2012-11-15 8:48 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki 2012-11-14 10:50 ` [patch 1/4] mm, oom: ensure sysrq+f always passes valid zonelist Michal Hocko 2012-11-14 10:50 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-14 11:03 ` David Rientjes 2012-11-14 11:03 ` David Rientjes 2012-11-14 13:31 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-14 13:31 ` Michal Hocko 2012-11-15 8:41 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki 2012-11-15 8:41 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20121115090204.GA11990@dhcp22.suse.cz \ --to=mhocko@suse.cz \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \ --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=rientjes@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.