All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 03/10] ARM: smp_twd: Divorce smp_twd from local timer API
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 09:41:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402084138.GG30477@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5154A37B.1070407@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:09:31PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/28/13 08:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > This works on my A9x4 coretile, bringing CPUs up and down via
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/online, so:
> >
> > Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> 
> Thanks. I still need to resolve patch #1 though.
> 
> >
> > Otherwise, is there any reason we couldn't now use the twd driver on a UP
> > system? Or would the overhead of handling frequency change make this pointless?
> 
> I don't see why not but I don't have any interest in pursuing it.

Ok.

> 
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:17:49PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >> index 5b71469..5ad2ccf 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >> @@ -1527,6 +1527,7 @@ config SMP
> >>  	depends on HAVE_SMP
> >>  	depends on MMU
> >>  	select HAVE_ARM_SCU if !ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP
> >> +	select HAVE_ARM_TWD if (!ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP && !EXYNOS4_MCT)
> > Could you not depend on your "Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries"
> > for this?
> 
> Right now the patches don't depend on the push down patch. Are you
> saying it would be better to depend on that patch?

It just seemed odd to me that the two series should conflict (though
trivially) here.

Mark.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 03/10] ARM: smp_twd: Divorce smp_twd from local timer API
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 09:41:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402084138.GG30477@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5154A37B.1070407@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:09:31PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/28/13 08:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > This works on my A9x4 coretile, bringing CPUs up and down via
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/online, so:
> >
> > Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> 
> Thanks. I still need to resolve patch #1 though.
> 
> >
> > Otherwise, is there any reason we couldn't now use the twd driver on a UP
> > system? Or would the overhead of handling frequency change make this pointless?
> 
> I don't see why not but I don't have any interest in pursuing it.

Ok.

> 
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:17:49PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >> index 5b71469..5ad2ccf 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >> @@ -1527,6 +1527,7 @@ config SMP
> >>  	depends on HAVE_SMP
> >>  	depends on MMU
> >>  	select HAVE_ARM_SCU if !ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP
> >> +	select HAVE_ARM_TWD if (!ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP && !EXYNOS4_MCT)
> > Could you not depend on your "Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries"
> > for this?
> 
> Right now the patches don't depend on the push down patch. Are you
> saying it would be better to depend on that patch?

It just seemed odd to me that the two series should conflict (though
trivially) here.

Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-02  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-13 18:17 [PATCHv3 00/10] Remove ARM local timer API Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17 ` [PATCHv3 01/10] clocksource: add generic dummy timer driver Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-21 18:09   ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-21 18:09     ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-21 18:09     ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-21 18:13     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-21 18:13       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-21 18:13       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-22 18:03       ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-22 18:03         ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-22 18:03         ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-25 16:49         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-25 16:49           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-25 16:49           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-25 18:00           ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-25 18:00             ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-25 18:00             ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-25 20:47             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-25 20:47               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-25 20:47               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-26 15:26               ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-26 15:26                 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-26 15:26                 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-26  2:14             ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-26  2:14               ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-26  2:14               ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-26 11:28               ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-26 11:28                 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-26 11:28                 ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-05  1:46                 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-05  1:46                   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-05  1:46                   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17 ` [PATCHv3 02/10] ARM: smp: Remove duplicate dummy timer implementation Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17 ` [PATCHv3 03/10] ARM: smp_twd: Divorce smp_twd from local timer API Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-28 15:22   ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-28 15:22     ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-28 15:22     ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-28 20:09     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-28 20:09       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-28 20:09       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-02  8:41       ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2013-04-02  8:41         ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-02  8:41         ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-13 18:17 ` [PATCHv3 04/10] ARM: OMAP2+: Divorce " Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17 ` [PATCHv3 05/10] ARM: EXYNOS4: Divorce mct " Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17 ` [PATCHv3 06/10] ARM: PRIMA2: Divorce timer-marco " Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17 ` [PATCHv3 07/10] ARM: msm: Divorce msm_timer " Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17 ` [PATCHv3 08/10] clocksource: time-armada-370-xp: Fix sparse warning Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-20 17:06   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-03-20 17:06     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-03-13 18:17 ` [PATCHv3 09/10] clocksource: time-armada-370-xp: Divorce from local timer API Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-20 17:09   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-03-20 17:09     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-03-20 17:20     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-20 17:20       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-20 17:26       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-03-20 17:26         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-03-20 17:44         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-03-20 17:44           ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-03-20 18:00           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-20 18:00             ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-20 17:21     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-03-20 17:21       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-03-13 18:17 ` [PATCHv3 10/10] ARM: smp: Remove " Stephen Boyd
2013-03-13 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130402084138.GG30477@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.