All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:51:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130422155147.GA7018@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517558EE.5020708@codeaurora.org>

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/22/13 08:34, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic
> >> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an
> >> arm64 compiler.
> >>
> >> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go in
> >> at the same time.
> >>
> >> Stephen Boyd (4):
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock
> >>   ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64()
> >>
> >>  arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h |   5 +-
> >>  arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c       |  14 +----
> >>  arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c      | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >>  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> > I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able
> > to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree
> > this series was based on.
> >
> > What do I need to use as the base for this series?
> 
> These are based on next-20130419.

Cheers!

Mark.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:51:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130422155147.GA7018@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517558EE.5020708@codeaurora.org>

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/22/13 08:34, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic
> >> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an
> >> arm64 compiler.
> >>
> >> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go in
> >> at the same time.
> >>
> >> Stephen Boyd (4):
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock
> >>   ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64()
> >>
> >>  arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h |   5 +-
> >>  arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c       |  14 +----
> >>  arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c      | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >>  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> > I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able
> > to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree
> > this series was based on.
> >
> > What do I need to use as the base for this series?
> 
> These are based on next-20130419.

Cheers!

Mark.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:51:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130422155147.GA7018@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517558EE.5020708@codeaurora.org>

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/22/13 08:34, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic
> >> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an
> >> arm64 compiler.
> >>
> >> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go in
> >> at the same time.
> >>
> >> Stephen Boyd (4):
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock
> >>   ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64()
> >>
> >>  arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h |   5 +-
> >>  arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c       |  14 +----
> >>  arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c      | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >>  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> > I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able
> > to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree
> > this series was based on.
> >
> > What do I need to use as the base for this series?
> 
> These are based on next-20130419.

Cheers!

Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-22 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-18 19:30 [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: unify sched_clock init Rob Herring
2013-04-18 19:30 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-18 19:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: add boot and suspend sched_clock offset Rob Herring
2013-04-18 19:30   ` Rob Herring
2013-04-19 14:46   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-04-19 14:46     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-04-19  0:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: unify sched_clock init Stephen Boyd
2013-04-19  0:00   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-19  1:37   ` Rob Herring
2013-04-19  1:37     ` Rob Herring
2013-04-19 17:34     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-19 17:34       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29     ` [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2 Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29       ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29       ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29       ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-22 10:48         ` Will Deacon
2013-04-22 10:48           ` Will Deacon
2013-04-22 10:48           ` Will Deacon
2013-04-22 15:35           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-22 15:35             ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-22 15:35             ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29       ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64() Stephen Boyd
2013-04-20  0:29         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-22 15:16       ` [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2 Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 15:16         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 15:34       ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-22 15:34         ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-22 15:34         ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-22 15:36         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-22 15:36           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-22 15:36           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-22 15:51           ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2013-04-22 15:51             ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-22 15:51             ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-22 17:00       ` John Stultz
2013-04-22 17:00         ` John Stultz
2013-04-22 20:46         ` Rob Herring
2013-04-22 20:46           ` Rob Herring
2013-04-22 20:46           ` Rob Herring
2013-04-23 16:34           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-23 16:34             ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-01  0:54       ` [PATCH 5/4] sched: Make ARM's sched_clock generic for all architectures Stephen Boyd
2013-05-01  0:54         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-01  0:54         ` [PATCH 6/4] arm64: Move to generic sched_clock infrastructure Stephen Boyd
2013-05-01  0:54           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-01  9:11           ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-01  9:11             ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-01  9:11             ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-01 14:44             ` Christopher Covington
2013-05-01 14:44               ` Christopher Covington
2013-05-01 14:44               ` Christopher Covington
2013-05-31 20:40         ` [PATCH 5/4] sched: Make ARM's sched_clock generic for all architectures John Stultz
2013-05-31 20:40           ` John Stultz
2013-05-31 22:13           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-31 22:13             ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-31 23:50             ` John Stultz
2013-05-31 23:50               ` John Stultz
2013-04-19 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: unify sched_clock init Catalin Marinas
2013-04-19 14:45   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130422155147.GA7018@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=arm@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.