All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/8] DRM: Armada: Add Armada DRM driver
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:50:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130613115016.GB18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130613111903.GA18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:19:03PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> The deeper I look, the more bugs there seem to be in this DRM stuff,
> and I'm continuing to look because I'm chasing a framebuffer refcount
> bug.

So, this refcount bug - I think I've just found it.  This is the flow of
references to the new fb on mode set:

drm_mode_setcrtc():
                        fb = drm_framebuffer_lookup(dev, crtc_req->fb_id);
        set.fb = fb;
        ret = drm_mode_set_config_internal(&set);
drm_mode_set_config_internal():
        fb = set->fb;
        ret = crtc->funcs->set_config(set);
drm_crtc_helper_set_config():
                        old_fb = set->crtc->fb;
                        set->crtc->fb = set->fb;
                        if (!drm_crtc_helper_set_mode(set->crtc, set->mode,
                                                      set->x, set->y,
                                                      old_fb)) {
                drm_helper_disable_unused_functions(dev);
drm_helper_disable_unused_functions():
        list_for_each_entry(crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head) {
                crtc->enabled = drm_helper_crtc_in_use(crtc);
                if (!crtc->enabled) {
                        crtc->fb = NULL;
		}
	}
back to drm_mode_set_config_internal():
        if (ret == 0) {
                if (fb)
                        drm_framebuffer_reference(fb);
back to drm_mode_setcrtc():
        if (fb)
                drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);

Assuming success all the way through, what happens when a CRTC is unused
is:

1. We obtain a reference in drm_mode_setcrtc() via the lookup.
2. We set the mode
3. In trying to set the mode, we discover that all connectors for the CRTC
   are in the disconnected state, and so we disable the CRTC
4. We set crtc->fb to NULL
5. back in drm_mode_set_config_internal(), we take a reference on the
   framebuffer irrespective of this.
6. back in drm_mode_setcrtc(), we drop the original reference caused by
   the lookup.

We now have a framebuffer with a reference count incremented by one but
no actual reference to it - the CRTC's reference is completely lost by
the action of drm_helper_disable_unused_functions().

You could argue that it's something the driver should deal with - fine,
but what if it only implements the DPMS method?  Should it drop a
reference to the framebuffer when DPMS instructs it to turn off?  Surely
not, because that means when DPMS turns stuff back on you're missing a
refcount.

Are drivers required to implement a disable function and cater for the
imbalance in the upper layers of code?  If so, this is not a clean
design.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] DRM: Armada: Add Armada DRM driver
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:50:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130613115016.GB18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130613111903.GA18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:19:03PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> The deeper I look, the more bugs there seem to be in this DRM stuff,
> and I'm continuing to look because I'm chasing a framebuffer refcount
> bug.

So, this refcount bug - I think I've just found it.  This is the flow of
references to the new fb on mode set:

drm_mode_setcrtc():
                        fb = drm_framebuffer_lookup(dev, crtc_req->fb_id);
        set.fb = fb;
        ret = drm_mode_set_config_internal(&set);
drm_mode_set_config_internal():
        fb = set->fb;
        ret = crtc->funcs->set_config(set);
drm_crtc_helper_set_config():
                        old_fb = set->crtc->fb;
                        set->crtc->fb = set->fb;
                        if (!drm_crtc_helper_set_mode(set->crtc, set->mode,
                                                      set->x, set->y,
                                                      old_fb)) {
                drm_helper_disable_unused_functions(dev);
drm_helper_disable_unused_functions():
        list_for_each_entry(crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head) {
                crtc->enabled = drm_helper_crtc_in_use(crtc);
                if (!crtc->enabled) {
                        crtc->fb = NULL;
		}
	}
back to drm_mode_set_config_internal():
        if (ret == 0) {
                if (fb)
                        drm_framebuffer_reference(fb);
back to drm_mode_setcrtc():
        if (fb)
                drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);

Assuming success all the way through, what happens when a CRTC is unused
is:

1. We obtain a reference in drm_mode_setcrtc() via the lookup.
2. We set the mode
3. In trying to set the mode, we discover that all connectors for the CRTC
   are in the disconnected state, and so we disable the CRTC
4. We set crtc->fb to NULL
5. back in drm_mode_set_config_internal(), we take a reference on the
   framebuffer irrespective of this.
6. back in drm_mode_setcrtc(), we drop the original reference caused by
   the lookup.

We now have a framebuffer with a reference count incremented by one but
no actual reference to it - the CRTC's reference is completely lost by
the action of drm_helper_disable_unused_functions().

You could argue that it's something the driver should deal with - fine,
but what if it only implements the DPMS method?  Should it drop a
reference to the framebuffer when DPMS instructs it to turn off?  Surely
not, because that means when DPMS turns stuff back on you're missing a
refcount.

Are drivers required to implement a disable function and cater for the
imbalance in the upper layers of code?  If so, this is not a clean
design.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-13 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-09 19:06 [RFC v2 0/8] rmk's Dove DRM/TDA19988 Cubox driver Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-09 19:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-09 19:29 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] DRM: Armada: Add Armada DRM driver Russell King
2013-06-09 19:32   ` Russell King
2013-06-10 11:10   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-10 11:10     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-10 21:48     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 21:48       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 21:56       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-10 21:56         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-10 15:57   ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 15:57     ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 17:06     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 17:06       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 19:59       ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 19:59         ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 20:08         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 20:08           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 21:01           ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 21:01             ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 21:15             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 21:15               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 22:49               ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 22:49                 ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 22:56                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 22:56                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 23:17                   ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 23:17                     ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 23:24                     ` Dave Airlie
2013-06-10 23:24                       ` Dave Airlie
2013-06-10 23:35                       ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 23:35                         ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 23:36                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 23:36                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 23:48                         ` Dave Airlie
2013-06-10 23:48                           ` Dave Airlie
2013-06-10 23:56                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 23:56                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-12 13:48                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-12 13:48                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-12 13:56                             ` Rob Clark
2013-06-12 13:56                               ` Rob Clark
2013-06-12 16:49                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-12 16:49                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-12 17:05                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-12 17:05                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-12 19:40                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-12 19:40                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-12 23:00                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-12 23:00                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-13  0:17                                       ` Rob Clark
2013-06-13  0:17                                         ` Rob Clark
2013-06-13 11:19                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-13 11:19                                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-13 11:50                                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-06-13 11:50                                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-13 13:03                                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-13 13:03                                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-14 14:23                                             ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-14 14:23                                               ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-14 14:42                                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-14 14:42                                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-14 19:50                                                 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-14 19:50                                                   ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-14 22:15                                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-14 22:15                                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-14 22:36                                                     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-14 22:36                                                       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-14 13:53                                           ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-14 13:53                                             ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-14 14:27                                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-14 14:27                                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-13 12:52                                         ` Rob Clark
2013-06-13 12:52                                           ` Rob Clark
2013-06-13 12:58                                           ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-13 12:58                                             ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-12 20:04                                   ` Rob Clark
2013-06-12 20:04                                     ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 23:38                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 23:38                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 23:49                       ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 23:49                         ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 22:01         ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-10 22:01           ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-10 22:32           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 22:32             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 23:12             ` Rob Clark
2013-06-10 23:12               ` Rob Clark
2013-06-11  7:33             ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-11  7:33               ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-11  8:08           ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-11  8:08             ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-10 21:38     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 21:38       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-09 19:30 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] drm/i2c: nxp-tda998x: fix EDID reading on TDA19988 devices Russell King
2013-06-09 19:30   ` Russell King
2013-06-09 19:31 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] drm/i2c: nxp-tda998x: ensure VIP output mux is properly set Russell King
2013-06-09 19:31   ` Russell King
2013-06-09 19:32 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] drm/i2c: nxp-tda998x: fix npix/nline programming Russell King
2013-06-09 19:32   ` Russell King
2013-06-09 20:02   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-09 20:02     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-09 19:34 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] drm/i2c: nxp-tda998x: prepare for video input configuration Russell King
2013-06-09 19:34   ` Russell King
2013-06-09 19:35 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] drm/i2c: nxp-tda998x: add video and audio " Russell King
2013-06-09 19:35   ` Russell King
2013-06-09 19:36 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] DRM: Armada: add support for drm tda19988 driver Russell King
2013-06-09 19:36   ` Russell King
2013-06-09 19:43 ` [RFC v2 0/8] rmk's Dove DRM/TDA19988 Cubox driver Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-09 19:43   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 22:47 ` [RFC v3 0/4] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 22:47   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-10 22:48 ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/4] DRM: Armada: Add Armada DRM driver Russell King
2013-06-10 22:51   ` Russell King
2013-06-10 22:49 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/4] DRM: Armada: Add support for hardware cursors Russell King
2013-06-10 22:49   ` Russell King
2013-06-10 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/4] DRM: Armada: convert Armada hardware cursor support to RGB+transparency Russell King
2013-06-10 22:50   ` Russell King
2013-06-10 22:51 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/4] DRM: Armada: convert hardware cursor support to 64x32 or 32x64 ARGB Russell King
2013-06-10 22:51   ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130613115016.GB18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.