All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] vmcore: Introduce remap_oldmem_pfn_range()
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:20:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130715142059.GA23772@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DFE2FB.2000804@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 08:05:31PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:

[..]
> How about
> 
> static int mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
> ...
>         char *buf;
>         int rc;
> 
> #ifndef CONFIG_S390
>         return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> #endif
>         page = find_or_create_page(mapping, index, GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> Considering again, I don't think WARN_ONCE() is good now. The fact that fault occurs on
> mmap() region indicates some kind of buggy situation occurs on the process. The process
> should be killed as soon as possible. If user still wants to get crash dump, he should
> try again in another process.

I don't understand that. Process should be killed only if there was no
mapping created for the region process is trying to access.

If there is a mapping but we are trying to fault in the actual contents,
then it is not a problem of process. Process is accessing a region of 
memory which it is supposed to access.

Potential problem here is that remap_pfn_range() did not map everything
it was expected to so we have to resort on page fault handler to read
that in. So it is more of a kernel issue and not process issue and for
that WARN_ONCE() sounds better?

Vivek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] vmcore: Introduce remap_oldmem_pfn_range()
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:20:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130715142059.GA23772@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DFE2FB.2000804@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 08:05:31PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:

[..]
> How about
> 
> static int mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
> ...
>         char *buf;
>         int rc;
> 
> #ifndef CONFIG_S390
>         return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> #endif
>         page = find_or_create_page(mapping, index, GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> Considering again, I don't think WARN_ONCE() is good now. The fact that fault occurs on
> mmap() region indicates some kind of buggy situation occurs on the process. The process
> should be killed as soon as possible. If user still wants to get crash dump, he should
> try again in another process.

I don't understand that. Process should be killed only if there was no
mapping created for the region process is trying to access.

If there is a mapping but we are trying to fault in the actual contents,
then it is not a problem of process. Process is accessing a region of 
memory which it is supposed to access.

Potential problem here is that remap_pfn_range() did not map everything
it was expected to so we have to resort on page fault handler to read
that in. So it is more of a kernel issue and not process issue and for
that WARN_ONCE() sounds better?

Vivek

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-15 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-01 19:32 [PATCH v6 0/5] kdump: Allow ELF header creation in new kernel Michael Holzheu
2013-07-01 19:32 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-01 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] vmcore: Introduce ELF header in new memory feature Michael Holzheu
2013-07-01 19:32   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-02 15:27   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-02 15:27     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-01 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] s390/vmcore: Use " Michael Holzheu
2013-07-01 19:32   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-02 16:23   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-02 16:23     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-03  7:59     ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-03  7:59       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-03 14:15       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-03 14:15         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-03 14:39         ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-03 14:39           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-03 14:50           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-03 14:50             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-01 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] vmcore: Introduce remap_oldmem_pfn_range() Michael Holzheu
2013-07-01 19:32   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-02 15:42   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-02 15:42     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-03 13:59     ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-03 13:59       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-03 14:16       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-03 14:16         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-15 13:44     ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-15 13:44       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-15 14:27       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-15 14:27         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-16  9:25         ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-16  9:25           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-16 14:04           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-16 14:04             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-16 15:37             ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-16 15:37               ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-16 15:55               ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-16 15:55                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-08  5:32   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-08  5:32     ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-08  9:28     ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-08  9:28       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-08 14:28       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-08 14:28         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-09  5:49         ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-09  5:49           ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-10  8:42           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-10  8:42             ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-10  9:50             ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-10  9:50               ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-10 11:00               ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-10 11:00                 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-12 16:02                 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-12 16:02                   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-15  9:21                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2013-07-15  9:21                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2013-07-16  0:51                     ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-16  0:51                       ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-10 14:33               ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-10 14:33                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-12 11:05                 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-12 11:05                   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-15 14:20                   ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-07-15 14:20                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-16  0:27                     ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-16  0:27                       ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-16  9:40                       ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-16  9:40                         ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-09  5:31       ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-09  5:31         ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-01 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] s390/vmcore: Implement remap_oldmem_pfn_range for s390 Michael Holzheu
2013-07-01 19:32   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-01 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] s390/vmcore: Use vmcore for zfcpdump Michael Holzheu
2013-07-01 19:32   ` Michael Holzheu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130715142059.GA23772@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.