All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: How to create IRQ mappings in a GPIO driver that doesn't control its IRQ domain ?
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:15:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130725131556.GD9858@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408178.cxAUTUGJc5@avalon>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 775 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> The two devices are independent, so there's no real parent/child relationship. 
> However, as Grant proposed, I could list all the interrupts associated with 
> GPIOs in the GPIO controller DT node. I would then just call 
> irq_of_parse_and_map() in the .to_irq() handler to magically translate the 
> GPIO number to a mapped IRQ number.

> The number of interrupts can be pretty high (up to 58 in the worst case so 
> far), so an alternative would be to specify the interrupt-parent only, and 
> call irq_create_of_mapping() directly. What solution would you prefer ?

Are the interrupts in a contiguous block in the controller so you can
just pass around the controller and a base number?

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: How to create IRQ mappings in a GPIO driver that doesn't control its IRQ domain ?
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:15:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130725131556.GD9858@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408178.cxAUTUGJc5@avalon>

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> The two devices are independent, so there's no real parent/child relationship. 
> However, as Grant proposed, I could list all the interrupts associated with 
> GPIOs in the GPIO controller DT node. I would then just call 
> irq_of_parse_and_map() in the .to_irq() handler to magically translate the 
> GPIO number to a mapped IRQ number.

> The number of interrupts can be pretty high (up to 58 in the worst case so 
> far), so an alternative would be to specify the interrupt-parent only, and 
> call irq_create_of_mapping() directly. What solution would you prefer ?

Are the interrupts in a contiguous block in the controller so you can
just pass around the controller and a base number?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130725/7689d8e3/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-25 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-23 23:21 How to create IRQ mappings in a GPIO driver that doesn't control its IRQ domain ? Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-23 23:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-24 20:24 ` Grant Likely
2013-07-24 20:24   ` Grant Likely
2013-07-25  9:42   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25  9:42     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25  9:20 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-25  9:20   ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-25  9:45   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25  9:45     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25 13:15     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2013-07-25 13:15       ` Mark Brown
2013-07-25 13:21       ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-25 13:21         ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-25 13:53         ` Mark Brown
2013-07-25 13:53           ` Mark Brown
2013-07-25 13:22       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25 13:22         ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25 13:55         ` Mark Brown
2013-07-25 13:55           ` Mark Brown
2013-07-28  5:00         ` Grant Likely
2013-07-28  5:00           ` Grant Likely
2013-07-31 11:14           ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-31 11:14             ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-25 13:19     ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-25 13:19       ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-28 10:07 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-07-28 10:07   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-07-31 11:11   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-31 11:11     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-31 11:29     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-07-31 11:29       ` Tomasz Figa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130725131556.GD9858@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.