From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> To: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>, Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org>, Michael Bohan <mbohan@codeaurora.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] spmi: Linux driver framework for SPMI Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:49:21 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20130816184921.GB31510@kroah.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <02deef1d90121011ab1df90ad704ef0ee36e2584.1376596224.git.joshc@codeaurora.org> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:37:09PM -0700, Josh Cartwright wrote: > +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c > @@ -0,0 +1,449 @@ > +/* Copyright (c) 2012-2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and > + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > + */ > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__ > + > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/errno.h> > +#include <linux/idr.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/spmi.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > + > +#include "spmi-dbgfs.h" > + > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(board_lock); > +static DEFINE_IDR(ctrl_idr); > + > +static void spmi_dev_release(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct spmi_device *spmidev = to_spmi_device(dev); > + kfree(spmidev); > +} > + > +static struct device_type spmi_dev_type = { > + .release = spmi_dev_release, > +}; I give a lot of people crap when they get things wrong with the driver model, so it's only fair to call out when it's done correctly. Nice job here, thanks for getting this right. > +static void spmi_ctrl_release(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct spmi_controller *ctrl = to_spmi_controller(dev); > + complete(&ctrl->dev_released); When is this memory going to be freed? Ah, you think it will be when you remove the device later on: > +int spmi_del_controller(struct spmi_controller *ctrl) > +{ > + struct spmi_controller *found; > + > + if (!ctrl) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* Check that the ctrl has been added */ > + mutex_lock(&board_lock); > + found = idr_find(&ctrl_idr, ctrl->nr); > + mutex_unlock(&board_lock); > + > + if (found != ctrl) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + spmi_dfs_del_controller(ctrl); > + > + /* Remove all the clients associated with this controller */ > + mutex_lock(&board_lock); > + bus_for_each_dev(&spmi_bus_type, NULL, ctrl, spmi_ctrl_remove_device); > + idr_remove(&ctrl_idr, ctrl->nr); > + mutex_unlock(&board_lock); > + > + init_completion(&ctrl->dev_released); > + device_unregister(&ctrl->dev); > + wait_for_completion(&ctrl->dev_released); But you just leaked memory, right? You should never have to wait for this to happen, why did you need to add this? Why not just a simple call to kfree() in the release function? thanks, greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/3] spmi: Linux driver framework for SPMI Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:49:21 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20130816184921.GB31510@kroah.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <02deef1d90121011ab1df90ad704ef0ee36e2584.1376596224.git.joshc@codeaurora.org> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:37:09PM -0700, Josh Cartwright wrote: > +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c > @@ -0,0 +1,449 @@ > +/* Copyright (c) 2012-2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and > + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > + */ > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__ > + > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/errno.h> > +#include <linux/idr.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/spmi.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > + > +#include "spmi-dbgfs.h" > + > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(board_lock); > +static DEFINE_IDR(ctrl_idr); > + > +static void spmi_dev_release(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct spmi_device *spmidev = to_spmi_device(dev); > + kfree(spmidev); > +} > + > +static struct device_type spmi_dev_type = { > + .release = spmi_dev_release, > +}; I give a lot of people crap when they get things wrong with the driver model, so it's only fair to call out when it's done correctly. Nice job here, thanks for getting this right. > +static void spmi_ctrl_release(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct spmi_controller *ctrl = to_spmi_controller(dev); > + complete(&ctrl->dev_released); When is this memory going to be freed? Ah, you think it will be when you remove the device later on: > +int spmi_del_controller(struct spmi_controller *ctrl) > +{ > + struct spmi_controller *found; > + > + if (!ctrl) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* Check that the ctrl has been added */ > + mutex_lock(&board_lock); > + found = idr_find(&ctrl_idr, ctrl->nr); > + mutex_unlock(&board_lock); > + > + if (found != ctrl) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + spmi_dfs_del_controller(ctrl); > + > + /* Remove all the clients associated with this controller */ > + mutex_lock(&board_lock); > + bus_for_each_dev(&spmi_bus_type, NULL, ctrl, spmi_ctrl_remove_device); > + idr_remove(&ctrl_idr, ctrl->nr); > + mutex_unlock(&board_lock); > + > + init_completion(&ctrl->dev_released); > + device_unregister(&ctrl->dev); > + wait_for_completion(&ctrl->dev_released); But you just leaked memory, right? You should never have to wait for this to happen, why did you need to add this? Why not just a simple call to kfree() in the release function? thanks, greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-16 18:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-08-15 19:50 [PATCH RFC 0/3] Add support for the System Power Management Interface (SPMI) Josh Cartwright 2013-08-15 19:50 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-09 20:37 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] spmi: Add MSM PMIC Arbiter SPMI controller Josh Cartwright 2013-08-09 20:37 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 18:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 18:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-09 20:37 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] spmi: Linux driver framework for SPMI Josh Cartwright 2013-08-09 20:37 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 18:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 18:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 19:47 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 19:47 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 19:47 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 19:50 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 19:50 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 19:50 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 19:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 19:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 19:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 20:40 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 20:40 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 20:40 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 20:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 20:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 20:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 18:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message] 2013-08-16 18:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 20:21 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 20:21 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 20:21 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 20:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 20:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 20:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2013-08-16 19:04 ` Kumar Gala 2013-08-16 19:04 ` Kumar Gala 2013-08-16 19:04 ` Kumar Gala [not found] ` <b639088d50df93caaef8fe7e09c12953b1153ce8.1376596224.git.joshc@codeaurora.org> [not found] ` <D1534646-7CB5-4EE7-8C1E-1C607BE22396@codeaurora.org> 2013-08-16 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] spmi: document the PMIC arbiter SPMI bindings Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 19:25 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 19:25 ` Josh Cartwright 2013-08-16 19:48 ` Kumar Gala 2013-08-16 19:48 ` Kumar Gala 2013-08-16 19:48 ` Kumar Gala 2013-08-16 23:17 ` Stephen Warren 2013-08-16 23:17 ` Stephen Warren 2013-08-16 23:17 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20130816184921.GB31510@kroah.com \ --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=gavidov@codeaurora.org \ --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \ --cc=joshc@codeaurora.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mbohan@codeaurora.org \ --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \ --cc=sdharia@codeaurora.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.