From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Cc: "fabio.estevam@freescale.com" <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>,
"u-boot@lists.denx.de" <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@digi.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
scottwood@freescale.com, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gpmi-nand driver and jffs2 support
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 13:32:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309021332.34063.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5224670F.6000703@freescale.com>
Dear Huang Shijie,
> 于 2013年09月02日 18:10, Hector Palacios 写道:
> > So does this mean that U-Boot is now unable to properly write a JFFS2
> > partition for it to be understood by the linux-next
>
> For the gpmi nand controller, the uboot is not proper to write a jffs2 now.
>
> > kernel? What is exactly the difference? Does it only affect Freescale
> > NAND controllers?
>
> I think there are many difference. Just diff the nand_base.c, you can
> see there are many patches merged in
> the kernel's mtd code, but not exit in the uboot's mtd code.
This makes not much sense to me. If what you claim is true, than JFFS2 in U-Boot
and Linux would be incompatible for all MTD drivers. This would also mean that
JFFS2 in Linux 3.7 is incompatible with Linux-next (since 3.7 was the last sync
point between U-Boot and Linux MTD). Is that really the case?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] gpmi-nand driver and jffs2 support
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 13:32:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309021332.34063.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5224670F.6000703@freescale.com>
Dear Huang Shijie,
> ? 2013?09?02? 18:10, Hector Palacios ??:
> > So does this mean that U-Boot is now unable to properly write a JFFS2
> > partition for it to be understood by the linux-next
>
> For the gpmi nand controller, the uboot is not proper to write a jffs2 now.
>
> > kernel? What is exactly the difference? Does it only affect Freescale
> > NAND controllers?
>
> I think there are many difference. Just diff the nand_base.c, you can
> see there are many patches merged in
> the kernel's mtd code, but not exit in the uboot's mtd code.
This makes not much sense to me. If what you claim is true, than JFFS2 in U-Boot
and Linux would be incompatible for all MTD drivers. This would also mean that
JFFS2 in Linux 3.7 is incompatible with Linux-next (since 3.7 was the last sync
point between U-Boot and Linux MTD). Is that really the case?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-02 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-30 9:15 gpmi-nand driver and jffs2 support Hector Palacios
2013-08-30 9:55 ` Huang Shijie
2013-08-30 14:24 ` Hector Palacios
2013-08-31 2:53 ` Huang Shijie
2013-08-30 15:23 ` Hector Palacios
2013-08-31 3:34 ` Huang Shijie
2013-08-30 16:31 ` Hector Palacios
2013-08-30 16:37 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-08-30 16:41 ` Hector Palacios
2013-08-31 13:37 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-02 8:12 ` Hector Palacios
2013-09-02 8:24 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-02 8:42 ` Hector Palacios
2013-09-02 8:50 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-02 10:10 ` Hector Palacios
2013-09-02 10:10 ` [U-Boot] " Hector Palacios
2013-09-02 10:23 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-02 10:23 ` [U-Boot] " Huang Shijie
2013-09-02 11:32 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-09-02 11:32 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-03 2:06 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-03 2:06 ` [U-Boot] " Huang Shijie
2013-09-03 11:53 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-03 11:53 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut
2013-09-04 2:26 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-04 2:26 ` [U-Boot] " Huang Shijie
2013-09-04 14:00 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-04 14:00 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut
2013-09-05 2:41 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-05 2:41 ` [U-Boot] " Huang Shijie
2013-09-04 14:38 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-04 14:38 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut
2013-09-04 15:46 ` Hector Palacios
2013-09-04 15:46 ` [U-Boot] " Hector Palacios
2013-09-05 6:01 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-05 6:01 ` [U-Boot] " Huang Shijie
2013-09-15 14:18 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-15 14:18 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut
2013-09-16 2:35 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-16 2:35 ` [U-Boot] " Huang Shijie
2013-09-19 16:07 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-19 16:07 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut
2013-09-19 16:13 ` Hector Palacios
2013-09-19 16:13 ` [U-Boot] " Hector Palacios
2013-09-19 16:14 ` Hector Palacios
2013-09-19 16:14 ` [U-Boot] " Hector Palacios
2013-09-19 16:16 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-19 16:16 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut
2013-09-19 17:20 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-19 17:20 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut
2013-09-15 14:12 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-15 14:12 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut
2013-08-31 17:51 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-24 9:50 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-24 10:46 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-24 12:53 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-25 9:08 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-29 22:52 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201309021332.34063.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=hector.palacios@digi.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.