All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, -v2] compiler/gcc4: Add quirk for 'asm goto' miscompilation bug
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:04:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131010150416.GB5167@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131010131034.GN3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> > So for >= 4.8.3 just assume no workaround is needed, otherwise scan 
> > assembly.
> 
> Right, tedious and error prone it is.. :-)
> 
> Would it make sense to create something whereby GCC can tell us about 
> these things? Maybe something like:
> 
>   __builtin_bug_fixed(58670)
> 
> Which would default return 0, and only return 1 when its a known number.
>
> But yes, I also see why you'd not want to do that. I suppose all I'm 
> saying is it would be nice to be able to detect some arbitrary issue 
> being fixed.

Basically not a monolithic 1-dimensional feature value but a more 
finegrained multi-dimensional feature vector would be nice.

It could be used not just for bugs but for all regular features as well, 
as they are added.

Something like:

	__builtin_feature(asm_goto)

would return 1 for a basic asm goto implementation and 0 for unknown 
feature strings. Any individual bug, if applications are affected by it, 
would then would be discoverable:

	__builtin_feature(asm_goto_bug_58670_fixed)

(or a fully symbolic name would suffice as well.) On old GCC this would 
return 1, on anything 4.8.2 and higher it would return 1.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-10 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-05 23:44 [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00740060 Fengguang Wu
2013-10-05 23:47 ` [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 08000060 Fengguang Wu
2013-10-06  7:27   ` Mike Galbraith
2013-10-06  7:36     ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-07  8:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-07  9:17     ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-07  9:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-07  9:46         ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-07  8:55 ` [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00740060 Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-07  9:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-07 11:32     ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-07  9:27   ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-07 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08  7:51   ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-08 16:21     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08 17:15       ` [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) Fengguang Wu
2013-10-08 17:31         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-09  1:09           ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-09  1:33             ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08 18:51       ` [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00740060 Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-08 19:05         ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-08 19:20           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08 19:34             ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08 19:35           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-08 19:49             ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-09  1:43           ` Mike Galbraith
2013-10-08 19:05         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08 16:46     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-08 14:34   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-09  8:04     ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-09 12:19       ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-09 12:21         ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-09 12:27         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-09 12:52           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-09 17:18             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10  2:15               ` Mike Galbraith
2013-10-09 12:56           ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-09 12:43       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-09 14:07         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-09 14:17           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-09 14:32           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-09 14:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-09 14:46             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-09 18:16               ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-09 18:54                 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-09 19:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-09 19:08                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-10  6:22                     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10  6:51                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-10  8:04                         ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-10  8:24                           ` [PATCH] gcc4: Add 'asm goto' miscompilation quirk Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10  8:31                             ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-10  8:45                               ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10  8:55                                 ` [PATCH, -v2] compiler/gcc4: Add quirk for 'asm goto' miscompilation bug Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10 11:56                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 12:32                                     ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-10 13:10                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 15:04                                         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-10-10 14:04                               ` [PATCH] gcc4: Add 'asm goto' miscompilation quirk Richard Henderson
2013-10-10 14:27                                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-10 15:12                                   ` [PATCH, -v3] compiler/gcc4: Add quirk for 'asm goto' miscompilation bug Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10 16:15                                     ` Richard Henderson
2013-10-10 16:49                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-11  4:35                                     ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-11  5:46                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-11  6:51                                         ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-11  9:30                                           ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-12 17:03                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10  8:34                             ` [PATCH] gcc4: Add 'asm goto' miscompilation quirk Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131010150416.GB5167@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.