All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>,
	"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] uprobes: add arch write opcode hook
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:49:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131028194914.GA15103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5268137F.3030809@linaro.org>

On 10/23, David Long wrote:
>
> On 10/19/13 12:50, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 10/15, David Long wrote:
>>>
>>> Allow arches to write the opcode with a custom function.  ARM needs to
>>> customize the swbp instruction depending on the condition code of the
>>> instruction it replaces.
>>
>> Well, we already have "__weak set_swbp(auprobe, ...)", can't arm use it?
>>
>> If not,
>>
>>> +void __weak arch_uprobe_write_opcode(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, void *vaddr,
>>> +				     uprobe_opcode_t opcode)
>>> +{
>>> +	memcpy(vaddr, &opcode, UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE);
>>> +}
>>> ...
>>> -	copy_to_page(new_page, vaddr, &opcode, UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE);
>>> +	vaddr_new = kmap_atomic(new_page);
>>> +	arch_uprobe_write_opcode(auprobe, vaddr_new + (vaddr & ~PAGE_MASK),
>>> +				 opcode);
>>> +	kunmap_atomic(vaddr_new);
>>
>> Again, if you need to add the new __weak helper, I think it should simply
>> do copy_to_page().
>>
>> Oleg.
>>
>
> Unfortunately, providing an alternative set_swbp() would mean
> duplicating a moderate chunk of code from kernel/uprobes.c.

Yes, yes, sorry for confusion. What I actually tried to suggest is
something like the trivial patch below.

Then arm can do:

	uprobe_opcode_t arch_uprobe_swbp_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
	{
		return __opcode_to_mem_arm(auprobe->bpinsn);
	}

No?

> I notice there don't seem to be any alternative set_swbp functions
> in the (rc6) kernel tree

Yes... I think we should simply make it "static". And set_orig_insn()
too.

Oleg.

--- x/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ x/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -304,6 +304,11 @@ put_old:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+uprobe_opcode_t __weak arch_uprobe_swbp_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
+{
+	return UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
+}
+
 /**
  * set_swbp - store breakpoint at a given address.
  * @auprobe: arch specific probepoint information.
@@ -315,7 +320,7 @@ put_old:
  */
 int __weak set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
 {
-	return write_opcode(mm, vaddr, UPROBE_SWBP_INSN);
+	return write_opcode(mm, vaddr, arch_uprobe_swbp_insn(auprobe));
 }
 
 /**


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: oleg@redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/13] uprobes: add arch write opcode hook
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:49:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131028194914.GA15103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5268137F.3030809@linaro.org>

On 10/23, David Long wrote:
>
> On 10/19/13 12:50, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 10/15, David Long wrote:
>>>
>>> Allow arches to write the opcode with a custom function.  ARM needs to
>>> customize the swbp instruction depending on the condition code of the
>>> instruction it replaces.
>>
>> Well, we already have "__weak set_swbp(auprobe, ...)", can't arm use it?
>>
>> If not,
>>
>>> +void __weak arch_uprobe_write_opcode(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, void *vaddr,
>>> +				     uprobe_opcode_t opcode)
>>> +{
>>> +	memcpy(vaddr, &opcode, UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE);
>>> +}
>>> ...
>>> -	copy_to_page(new_page, vaddr, &opcode, UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE);
>>> +	vaddr_new = kmap_atomic(new_page);
>>> +	arch_uprobe_write_opcode(auprobe, vaddr_new + (vaddr & ~PAGE_MASK),
>>> +				 opcode);
>>> +	kunmap_atomic(vaddr_new);
>>
>> Again, if you need to add the new __weak helper, I think it should simply
>> do copy_to_page().
>>
>> Oleg.
>>
>
> Unfortunately, providing an alternative set_swbp() would mean
> duplicating a moderate chunk of code from kernel/uprobes.c.

Yes, yes, sorry for confusion. What I actually tried to suggest is
something like the trivial patch below.

Then arm can do:

	uprobe_opcode_t arch_uprobe_swbp_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
	{
		return __opcode_to_mem_arm(auprobe->bpinsn);
	}

No?

> I notice there don't seem to be any alternative set_swbp functions
> in the (rc6) kernel tree

Yes... I think we should simply make it "static". And set_orig_insn()
too.

Oleg.

--- x/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ x/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -304,6 +304,11 @@ put_old:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+uprobe_opcode_t __weak arch_uprobe_swbp_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
+{
+	return UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
+}
+
 /**
  * set_swbp - store breakpoint at a given address.
  * @auprobe: arch specific probepoint information.
@@ -315,7 +320,7 @@ put_old:
  */
 int __weak set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
 {
-	return write_opcode(mm, vaddr, UPROBE_SWBP_INSN);
+	return write_opcode(mm, vaddr, arch_uprobe_swbp_insn(auprobe));
 }
 
 /**

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-28 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-15 21:04 [PATCH v2 00/13] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] uprobes: move function declarations out of arch David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long
2013-11-05 16:01   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 16:01     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 18:16     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 18:16       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 19:01       ` [PATCH] uprobes: Export write_opcode() as uprobe_write_opcode() Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 19:01         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 19:55         ` David Long
2013-11-05 19:55           ` David Long
2013-11-05 19:13       ` [PATCH v2 01/13] uprobes: move function declarations out of arch David Long
2013-11-05 19:13         ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] uprobes: allow ignoring of probe hits David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long
2013-10-19 17:02   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-19 17:02     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-22  3:45     ` David Long
2013-10-22  3:45       ` David Long
2013-10-22 11:25       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-22 11:25         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-22 23:56         ` David Long
2013-10-22 23:56           ` David Long
2013-10-28 18:54     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-28 18:54       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-30 21:11       ` David Long
2013-10-30 21:11         ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] uprobes: allow arch access to xol slot David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long
2013-10-19 16:36   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-19 16:36     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-23  0:03     ` David Long
2013-10-23  0:03       ` David Long
2013-10-29 15:40       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-29 15:40         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-04 19:49         ` [PATCH] uprobes: introduce arch_uprobe->ixol Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-04 19:49           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-04 21:25           ` David Long
2013-11-04 21:25             ` David Long
2013-11-05 16:04           ` David Long
2013-11-05 16:04             ` David Long
2013-11-05 18:01             ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 18:01               ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-05 18:45               ` David Long
2013-11-05 18:45                 ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] uprobes: allow arch-specific initialization David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long
2013-10-19 16:42   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-19 16:42     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-23  1:21     ` David Long
2013-10-23  1:21       ` David Long
2013-10-28 18:58       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-28 18:58         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-31 18:41         ` David Long
2013-10-31 18:41           ` David Long
2013-11-01 13:52           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-01 13:52             ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-04  3:24             ` David Long
2013-11-04  3:24               ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] uprobes: add arch write opcode hook David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long
2013-10-19 16:50   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-19 16:50     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-23 18:20     ` David Long
2013-10-23 18:20       ` David Long
2013-10-28 19:49       ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-10-28 19:49         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-29 19:59         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-29 19:59           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-02  3:33           ` David Long
2013-11-02  3:33             ` David Long
2013-11-02 14:03             ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-02 14:03               ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] ARM: move shared uprobe/kprobe definitions into new include file David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] ARM: move generic thumb instruction parsing code to new files for use by other features David Long
2013-11-13 17:09   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-13 17:09     ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-14 14:13     ` David Long
2013-11-14 14:13       ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] ARM: use a function table for determining instruction interpreter actions David Long
2013-11-13 17:11   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-13 17:11     ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-14 15:17     ` David Long
2013-11-14 15:17       ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] ARM: Disable jprobe selftests in thumb kernels David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long
2013-11-07 17:26   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-07 17:26     ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-10 22:57     ` David Long
2013-11-10 22:57       ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] kprobes: Remove uneeded kernel dependency on struct arch_specific_insn David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long
2013-11-13 17:13   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-13 17:13     ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-14  2:02     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-14  2:02       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-14 14:15       ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-14 14:15         ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-14 20:33         ` David Long
2013-11-14 20:33           ` David Long
2013-11-15 10:23           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-15 10:23             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-15 15:16             ` David Long
2013-11-15 15:16               ` David Long
2013-11-15 10:11         ` Re: " Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-15 10:11           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-14  1:20   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-14  1:20     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] ARM: Finish renaming ARM kprobes APIs for sharing with uprobes David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long
2013-11-13 17:16   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-13 17:16     ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-11-15 15:45     ` David Long
2013-11-15 15:45       ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] ARM: add uprobes support David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long
2013-10-15 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] ARM: Remove uprobes dependency on kprobes David Long
2013-10-15 21:04   ` David Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131028194914.GA15103@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rabin@rab.in \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tixy@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.