All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: jbacik@fb.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: find_fh_dentry returned a DISCONNECTED directory
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:46:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140214144640.GE21982@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ob2az5fc.fsf@xmission.com>

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 08:25:43PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:45:16PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Yesterday you passed on a report of this printk from nfsdfh.c firing:
> >> >
> >> > 	printk("nfsd: find_fh_dentry returned a DISCONNECTED directory: %pd2\n",
> >> > 	                                dentry);
> >> >
> >> > I think the dentry probably comes from the FILEID_ROOT case of:
> >> >
> >> > 	if (fileid_type == FILEID_ROOT)
> >> > 		dentry = dget(exp->ex_path.dentry);
> >> > 	else {
> >> > 		dentry = exportfs_decode_fh(exp->ex_path.mnt, fid,
> >> > 				data_left, fileid_type,
> >> > 				nfsd_acceptable, exp);
> >> >         }
> >> >
> >> > In that case the dentry was found using ordinary filesystem lookups, so
> >> > doesn't go through the same DISCONNECTED-clearing logic as in the case
> >> > of lookups by filehandle.
> >> >
> >> > Probably they have an export root that's not a filesystem root, and the
> >> > lookups happened in the right order?
> >> >
> >> > I suspect that's fine, and that the printk is just stupid, but maybe we
> >> > should clear DISCONNECTED when possible on normal lookups.  The
> >> > following is my attempt, though I'm not sure if d_alloc is the right
> >> > place to do this.  In any case it might help confirm this is what's
> >> > happening.
> >> >
> >> > So if you pass along this patch to the person who was seeing that printk
> >> > I'd be interested in the results.
> >> 
> >> I have been reading through the dentry code for other reasons and your
> >> patch definitely won't change anything. __d_alloc sets d_flags = 0.
> >> Therefore d_alloc always returns with d_flags == 0.
> >
> > You're right, of course.  I wasn't thinking straight.
> >
> > So the only dentries with DISCONNECTED set are those created with
> > d_obtain_alias, which is normally only used when you're looking up by
> > filehandle.
> >
> > Except btrfs has a weird use in get_default_root().  So maybe they were
> > running into the dentry that created?
> >
> > So btrfs should probably be using something else, I'm not sure what.
> 
> The nfs client also has the case where it uses DISCONNECTED dentries for
> directories that are not root on the server.  Which seems very similiar
> to the btrfs case.

I don't think there's any reason for those to be flagged DISCONNECTED
either.

--b.

> 
> Usually I would expect some of these things to pass through
> d_materialise_unique and become connected.  But I don't know much about
> the nfsd usage and how things connected.
> 
> Eric
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-14 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-13 21:27 find_fh_dentry returned a DISCONNECTED directory J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-13 23:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14  3:30   ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14  4:25     ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 14:46       ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2014-02-14 15:49         ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 16:14           ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14 16:38             ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-14 16:45               ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14 17:02                 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-14 17:14                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 17:11               ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 17:02             ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-14 22:19               ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14 22:41                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-14 14:17     ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-14 15:13     ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-14 15:38       ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140214144640.GE21982@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.