All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [patch v11 23/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Don't unflatten device tree if acpi=force is passed
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:31:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325173107.GQ14585@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427205776-5060-24-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:56PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Since the policy is that once we pass acpi=force in the early
> param, we will not unflatten device tree even if ACPI is disabled
> in ACPI table init fails, so fix the code by comparinging both
> acpi_disabled and param_acpi_force before the device tree is
> unflattened.
> 
> CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

but as I said, we should take Lorenzo's patch on top as well.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
	linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [patch v11 23/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Don't unflatten device tree if acpi=force is passed
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:31:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325173107.GQ14585@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427205776-5060-24-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:56PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Since the policy is that once we pass acpi=force in the early
> param, we will not unflatten device tree even if ACPI is disabled
> in ACPI table init fails, so fix the code by comparinging both
> acpi_disabled and param_acpi_force before the device tree is
> unflattened.
> 
> CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

but as I said, we should take Lorenzo's patch on top as well.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [patch v11 23/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Don't unflatten device tree if acpi=force is passed
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:31:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325173107.GQ14585@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427205776-5060-24-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:56PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Since the policy is that once we pass acpi=force in the early
> param, we will not unflatten device tree even if ACPI is disabled
> in ACPI table init fails, so fix the code by comparinging both
> acpi_disabled and param_acpi_force before the device tree is
> unflattened.
> 
> CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

but as I said, we should take Lorenzo's patch on top as well.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-25 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 142+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-24 14:02 [patch v11 00/23] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 01/23] ACPI / table: Use pr_debug() instead of pr_info() for MADT table scanning Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 02/23] ACPI: add arm64 to the platforms that use ioremap Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 16:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 16:43     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 16:43     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 03/23] ARM64: allow late use of early_ioremap Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 16:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 16:43     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 04/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Get RSDP and ACPI boot-time tables Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 16:44   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 16:44     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 05/23] ACPI: fix acpi_os_ioremap for arm64 Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 16:50   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 16:50     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 16:50     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 06/23] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 07/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce PCI stub functions for ACPI Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 16:50   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 16:50     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 08/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param "acpi=" to enable/disable ACPI Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 16:57   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 16:57     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 09/23] ARM64 / ACPI: If we chose to boot from acpi then disable FDT Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:00   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:00     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-26 10:57     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-26 10:57       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-26 10:57       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 10/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Get PSCI flags in FADT for PSCI init Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:01   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:01     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:01     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 11/23] ACPI / table: Print GIC information when MADT is parsed Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 12/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse MADT for SMP initialization Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:17   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:17     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:17     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-26 15:15     ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 15:15       ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 15:15       ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 19:48       ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-26 19:48         ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-26 19:48         ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-26 21:12         ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 21:12           ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 21:12           ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 23:01           ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-26 23:01             ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-26 23:01             ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 13/23] ACPI / processor: Introduce phys_cpuid_t for CPU hardware ID Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:21     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:21     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-26  3:49     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-26  3:49       ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-26  3:49       ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-26 15:13       ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 15:13         ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 15:13         ` Will Deacon
2015-03-27 13:40       ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-27 13:40         ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-27 13:40         ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-30 13:58         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-30 13:58           ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-30 13:58           ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-31  1:49           ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-31  1:49             ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-31  1:49             ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 14/23] ACPI / processor: Make it possible to get CPU hardware ID via GICC Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:25   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:25     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 15/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC and register device's gsi Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 16/23] irqchip: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:27   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:27     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:27     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 17/23] clocksource / arch_timer: Parse GTDT to initialize arch timer Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:28   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:28     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 18/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI is enabled on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:29     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 19/23] XEN / ACPI: Make XEN ACPI depend on X86 Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 15:30   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-24 15:30     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-24 15:30     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-24 17:24     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-03-24 17:24       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-03-24 17:24       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-03-25 11:51       ` Will Deacon
2015-03-25 11:51         ` Will Deacon
2015-03-25 11:51         ` Will Deacon
2015-03-25 15:38         ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-03-25 15:38           ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-03-25 15:38           ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 20/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:29     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 21/23] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:30   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:30     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 22/23] ARM64 / ACPI: additions of ACPI documentation for arm64 Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02 ` [patch v11 23/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Don't unflatten device tree if acpi=force is passed Hanjun Guo
2015-03-24 14:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 17:31   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2015-03-25 17:31     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-25 17:31     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 23:04 ` [patch v11 00/23] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-24 23:04   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-25 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 12:55     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25 12:55     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-25  3:53 ` Ming Lei
2015-03-25  3:53   ` Ming Lei
2015-03-30 16:49 ` Timur Tabi
2015-03-30 16:49   ` Timur Tabi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150325173107.GQ14585@localhost \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ashwinc@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.