All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>,
	Elad Raz <eladr@mellanox.com>, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: switchdev and VLAN ranges
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:41:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151011224125.GB21128@ketchup.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151011071208.GA2188@nanopsycho.orion>

On Oct. Sunday 11 (41) 09:12 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:36:26PM CEST, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
> >On 10/10/2015 09:49 AM, Elad Raz wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Oct 10, 2015, at 2:30 AM, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I have two concerns in mind:
> >>>
> >>> a) if we imagine that drivers like Rocker allocate memory in the prepare
> >>> phase for each VID, preparing a range like 100-4000 would definitely not
> >>> be recommended.
> >>>
> >>> b) imagine that you have two Linux bridges on a switch, one using the
> >>> hardware VLAN 100. If you request the VLAN range 99-101 for the other
> >>> bridge members, it is not possible for the driver to say "I can
> >>> accelerate VLAN 99 and 101, but not 100". It must return OPNOTSUPP for
> >>> the whole range.
> >> 
> >> Another concern I have with vid_being..vid_end range is the “flags”. Where flags can be BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID.
> >> There is no sense having more than one VLAN as a PVID.
> >> This leave the HW vendor the choice which VLAN id they will use as the PVID.
> >> 
> >
> >iproute2 doesn't allow to do it but I can see that someone can actually make it
> >so the flags for the range have it and it doesn't look correct. Perhaps we need
> >something like the patch below to enforce this from kernel-side.
> >
> >
> >diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> >index d78b4429505a..02b17b53e9a6 100644
> >--- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> >+++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> >@@ -524,6 +524,9 @@ static int br_afspec(struct net_bridge *br,
> > 			if (vinfo_start)
> > 				return -EINVAL;
> > 			vinfo_start = vinfo;
> >+			/* don't allow range of pvids */
> >+			if (vinfo_start->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID)
> >+				return -EINVAL;
> > 			continue;
> > 		}
> > 
> 
> Looks correct to me. Could you please submit this properly? Thanks!

The above patch is correct, but we only solve part of the problem, since
the range and bridge flags are exposed by switchdev_obj_port_vlan as is.

Thanks,
-v

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-11 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-09 23:30 switchdev and VLAN ranges Vivien Didelot
2015-10-10  4:22 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-10 16:33   ` Vivien Didelot
2015-10-10 18:10     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-10-10 19:47       ` Vivien Didelot
2015-10-10  7:49 ` Elad Raz
2015-10-10 10:36   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-10-11  7:12     ` Jiri Pirko
2015-10-11 10:49       ` [PATCH net-next] bridge: vlan: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-10-11 10:49         ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-10-11 14:13         ` Jiri Pirko
2015-10-13  2:59         ` David Miller
2015-10-13  2:59           ` [Bridge] " David Miller
2015-10-11 22:41       ` Vivien Didelot [this message]
2015-10-12  0:13         ` switchdev and VLAN ranges Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-10-12  5:14           ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-12 10:15             ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-10-12 12:01             ` [PATCH net-next] switchdev: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-10-12 12:11               ` Elad Raz
2015-10-12 12:17               ` Jiri Pirko
2015-10-12 17:36               ` Vivien Didelot
2015-10-13  6:13                 ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-13  8:31                 ` Ido Schimmel
2015-10-13 14:32                   ` Vivien Didelot
2015-10-14  6:14                     ` Ido Schimmel
2015-10-14 15:25                       ` Vivien Didelot
2015-10-14 17:14                         ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-14 17:42                           ` Ido Schimmel
2015-10-14 18:51                             ` Vivien Didelot
2015-10-14 22:08                               ` Florian Fainelli
2015-10-15  0:07                                 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-10-15  2:58                             ` Scott Feldman
2015-10-15  7:28                               ` Ido Schimmel
2015-10-13 11:42               ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151011224125.GB21128@ketchup.lan \
    --to=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=eladr@mellanox.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sfeldma@gmail.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.