From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, eladr@mellanox.com, davem@davemloft.net Subject: [PATCH net-next] bridge: vlan: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:49:56 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1444560596-7140-1-git-send-email-razor@blackwall.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20151011071208.GA2188@nanopsycho.orion> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Currently it's possible for someone to send a vlan range to the kernel with the pvid flag set which will result in the pvid bouncing from a vlan to vlan and isn't correct, it also introduces problems for hardware where it doesn't make sense having more than 1 pvid. iproute2 already enforces this, so let's enforce it on kernel-side as well. Reported-by: Elad Raz <eladr@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> --- net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c index d78b4429505a..02b17b53e9a6 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c @@ -524,6 +524,9 @@ static int br_afspec(struct net_bridge *br, if (vinfo_start) return -EINVAL; vinfo_start = vinfo; + /* don't allow range of pvids */ + if (vinfo_start->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID) + return -EINVAL; continue; } -- 2.4.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, eladr@mellanox.com, davem@davemloft.net Subject: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: vlan: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:49:56 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1444560596-7140-1-git-send-email-razor@blackwall.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20151011071208.GA2188@nanopsycho.orion> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Currently it's possible for someone to send a vlan range to the kernel with the pvid flag set which will result in the pvid bouncing from a vlan to vlan and isn't correct, it also introduces problems for hardware where it doesn't make sense having more than 1 pvid. iproute2 already enforces this, so let's enforce it on kernel-side as well. Reported-by: Elad Raz <eladr@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> --- net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c index d78b4429505a..02b17b53e9a6 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c @@ -524,6 +524,9 @@ static int br_afspec(struct net_bridge *br, if (vinfo_start) return -EINVAL; vinfo_start = vinfo; + /* don't allow range of pvids */ + if (vinfo_start->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID) + return -EINVAL; continue; } -- 2.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-11 10:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-10-09 23:30 switchdev and VLAN ranges Vivien Didelot 2015-10-10 4:22 ` Scott Feldman 2015-10-10 16:33 ` Vivien Didelot 2015-10-10 18:10 ` Florian Fainelli 2015-10-10 19:47 ` Vivien Didelot 2015-10-10 7:49 ` Elad Raz 2015-10-10 10:36 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov 2015-10-11 7:12 ` Jiri Pirko 2015-10-11 10:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message] 2015-10-11 10:49 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: vlan: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges Nikolay Aleksandrov 2015-10-11 14:13 ` Jiri Pirko 2015-10-13 2:59 ` David Miller 2015-10-13 2:59 ` [Bridge] " David Miller 2015-10-11 22:41 ` switchdev and VLAN ranges Vivien Didelot 2015-10-12 0:13 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov 2015-10-12 5:14 ` Scott Feldman 2015-10-12 10:15 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov 2015-10-12 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next] switchdev: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges Nikolay Aleksandrov 2015-10-12 12:11 ` Elad Raz 2015-10-12 12:17 ` Jiri Pirko 2015-10-12 17:36 ` Vivien Didelot 2015-10-13 6:13 ` Scott Feldman 2015-10-13 8:31 ` Ido Schimmel 2015-10-13 14:32 ` Vivien Didelot 2015-10-14 6:14 ` Ido Schimmel 2015-10-14 15:25 ` Vivien Didelot 2015-10-14 17:14 ` Scott Feldman 2015-10-14 17:42 ` Ido Schimmel 2015-10-14 18:51 ` Vivien Didelot 2015-10-14 22:08 ` Florian Fainelli 2015-10-15 0:07 ` Vivien Didelot 2015-10-15 2:58 ` Scott Feldman 2015-10-15 7:28 ` Ido Schimmel 2015-10-13 11:42 ` David Miller
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1444560596-7140-1-git-send-email-razor@blackwall.org \ --to=razor@blackwall.org \ --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=eladr@mellanox.com \ --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.